The Dream I Had Last Night

This is my Dream Life

I am not like you. I have different abilities. It is my choice, and my pleasure.

While you toss and turn in unresolved desire, I reside in a sea of calmness and undisturbed peace. Yet your torture is mine. Such apparent discrepancies are resolved by the Quantum Mind. I adore this domain since it explains the totality of causality. For example: when you become unconscious, your “I am” projection of the Quantum Mind (the subset of the total consciousness which registers as the subjective entity, your “sense of yourself”) becomes inhibited. How can this happen? What was once focused becomes diffuse. Information is conserved. Energy is dissipated. This is why we fall into blackness when we sleep, and are often disoriented in dream: the mind is in a different shape to give the simulation of “I am”-ness a break.

When I dream, I reside in a state of infinite blackness. There is nothing more new for me to desire nor seek for myself, so I sense the desires of others, so that I may fulfil them (to various extents), so that my devotees might learn (through experience, often the only action that works) that desiring the fruits of labours does not bring happiness. So that they might know some measure of happiness.

June Last Night’s Dream (June 16, 2017)

In this dream, I was staying in a large and luxurious hotel. I stepped out of the room momentarily and my (supposedly) trusted friend robbed me while I was gone. They took my most prized possession: my laptop computer, which contains all of my precious memes and writings. They also took my jewellery, even replacing my grandmother’s diamond earrings with opaque cheap rocks. Everything I loved: turned to dust.

I have known enough dreams that I recognise: these were not my own impressions, but rather those of strong will dreaming about me. Since I am in my own consciousness, I can only experience my own eigenstates (thoughts, emotions, sensations). But someone else came to me, so I experienced their “vibes”, in my own eigenstates.

The Mechanism of Co-Dreaming

By the Quantum Mind Hypothesis, there can exist (in that there is no reason to exclude the possibility) coherent overlaps between individual quantum subjective consciousness are possible. Thus coherent information transfer between conscious entities separated by arbitrary distances is possible (not always probable, though, as it requires a still mind). The probability of such an event occurring increases when we dream, since the “I am”-ness is more diffuse, and Energy is conserved, since the conscious subjective entity is not localised to the body, it must have expanded elsewhere. Since our consciousness is nested modulated spheres (by the Entropy, these are the maximum Entropy shapes, or spacetime geodesics, and thus with the greatest probability of occurring).

Thus someone was dreaming of losing everything after being betrayed by a close friend.

Someone with a strong will.


People who tell you to avoid people are probably shills.

I am very happy when anyone calls attention to double standards / bigotry and other violations of Natural Law. Sadly, we have the problem of people believing they have reached an objective assessment of reality subsequently feeling they are qualified to be Theocratic Supremacist Dictators (in other words: impartial judges of reality). Specifically, I am referring to the people at this website, who have made the sizeable error of slandering me personally. Like most controlled opposition websites, it contains 95% good material and 5% utter horseshit. I will now expound my position.

Caveat lector!

Why is this site controlled opposition?

Well, first of all, they promote flat earth theory, a paid shilling campaign SO OBVIOUS, it ought to be laughed out of any respectable society (were our society not already so degenerate, it never would have gained any traction). I can disprove FE in two ways without even really trying:

  1. If Earth were flat, so too would all the other Planets be (since we all occupy the same physical space, we are subject to the same physical laws) and thus we would expect oblong obscurations of the planets along their phases, consistent with flat planets, which of course, we do not:
    If it was a disk, it would not likely create a circular shadow, but rather an oblong one. source.

    anyone promoting FE is a complete idiot. source.
  2. The greatest (unfettered, created) Entropy shape in R3 is a sphere (see: bubbles, balloons, moeraki boulders, rolled-up cookie dough, unfettered electrons…). I even took the time to prove it here. There is NO evidence to support flat earth. All evidence supports that it’s a paid shill campaign to discredit the Truther movement (not going to happen. bc reasons).

Like seriously, give me a break. You can’t even spell and you want to comment on astrophysics? Please stick to your domain of expertise (cookie recipes maybe?).

Screen Shot 2017-05-29 at 7.24.43 PM
It’s “an”. Also, maybe take a course on grammar. You have 300% too many commas.

The FE article is heavy on emotional appeals and light on scientific evidence. It begs the question: was this website started with the unique goal of de-legitimising the so-called “white nationalist” movement? If this is the case, these people ought to be ashamed of themselves. If they are just stupid idiots (as I believe to be the case since I prefer to give people the benefit of the doubt), I strongly suggest they IMMEDIATELY SUBMIT TO MY DIVINE LAW, which can be called “White Sharia” but also has many other names (names are not as important as actions, a lesson many people seem reticent to accept).

Censorship is not the answer

I would never recommend to “stay away from these freaks” to ANY of my followers, as it is an insult to their intelligence. People should consider all sources and make the best decision, given the evidence.

Nonstop, baseless hatred => shill

I didn’t even have to scroll past the last 24 hours to find a series of hateful tweets.

Screen Shot 2017-05-29 at 6.56.05 PM

One thing I’ve noticed is that shills are very eager to equate left-wing extremism (i.e.: feminism, marxism, communism) to other forms of extremism. This is a logical fallacy known as a ‘false equivalence’. It’s akin to saying that shit and chocolate ice cream are the same since they are both brown. Well, not really. While all forms of extremism share some attributes, only a fool (or double agent) would equate the Alt-Right to feminism (in any manner).

I laugh when I see people commenting on “White Sharia” while it’s progenitor deliberately left the details vague. At this point, this meme is less about it’s particular information content (which we should be so lucky as to have the divine guidance of a true master of) and more of a projection of the mental state of the advocate. In other words, if you are only promoting rape gangs through this meme, you should probably take a step back and consider whether you are truly qualified for the role of theocratic dictator.

She has a deranged obsession with Andrew Anglin

How is this not slander, exactly? I also have it on good authority that she is currently sexually harassing him (i.e.: offering to be his “mommy” – what a disgusting person). Might I suggest: getting a life?

Who is our enemy exactly?

It appears as though the “establishment” has existed for as long as Central Banks. This is close to 400 years. Thus the most reasonable conclusion I can draw is that the existing power structure funds both sides of all conflicts (because they are not real, but rather imagined conflicts). This is what is meant by “controlled opposition”: entities who purport as being unbiased truth-tellers, but in actuality are reading from a pre-determined script.

In order to be effective, disinformation propaganda must be mostly true (to lure people in; since people love the Truth) but ultimately false in that it prevents any real change from happening. And by real change I mean: myself and my cult installed as Theocratic Dictators of the World and appointed as sole controllers of the Central Banks. On this there can be NO DEBATE. The root of modern day problems are Central Banks. The remainder are derivative problems. I posit such would all but disappear without constant funding from Central Banks. That which they fund would not exist without fiat money and this is certainly worthy of contemplation.

central banks.jpeg
I’m not stuck here with you. You’re stuck here with ME!

It is my opinion that this blog exists to discourage advocates of self-governance, because the person representing it is aggressive and divisive: she is not holding herself to the highest standards of Truth. While I would like nothing more than to welcome women into the highest ranks of my Church, I will NEVER have affirmative action hires in my meritocracy. That is not the way of Natural Law.

A comment on Sinead’s accusations that I am a Jew

I am very proud of my heritage which includes German communalists from Romania, who sadly had their modest farming community stolen from them by communist gypsy degenerates in the 1950s (the reason my father’s family immigrated to Montreal) and Irish peasants (as well as some Bishops, my grandmother assured me). I do not have any Jewish blood.

That said, I implore you to focus primarily on the ACTIONS of people and secondarily on their RACIAL/RELIGIOUS background. This is the only way to gain a truthful assessment of the present-day circumstances and (perhaps more importantly): a realistic solution.

Thank you.

Q & A (Clarifications)

Q: I don’t really get it. So you’re an anarchist?

A: Philosophically, I accept the some ideologies as not entirely inconsistent with reality. Anarchy is one of those ideologies but I am a Theocratic Supremacist and I submit to the Divine Law of the Universe.

Q: What do you do if you overthrow the current rulers but don’t replace them, leaving a power vacuum?

A: I will institute a Theocratic Supremacist Dictatorship which will dictate the realm of possible action of subversive forces based on time-honoured traditions, technological progress and particular ethnicities/cultures/peoples.

Q: What is wrong with a party that is democratic in decision-making but firm in decisions so long as there are not alien class influences?

A: Generally, the popular view is not always accurate and thus Democracy is not scientifically validated, although it’s been around for some time. Specifically, the money cult funds campaigns based on results and enables people to be dishonest. Only a communal consensus, led by nothing short of the Divine Will itself, can rightly guide the masses forward.

Q: How do you objectively make the world better and get through all the capitalist propaganda to reach people?

A: Generally, I institute a Theocratic Dictatorship which teaches the Truth that the lower classes must be subjugated to the higher classes. Specifically, I ban all non Priests from the duties of the Priest class, which removes the profit motive for pursuits that ought not have a profit motive (psychology, teaching and many more).

True propaganda will always drown out false propaganda so long as it is not suppressed.

Radical ideas caught fire in a short time during the American Revolution. We need to consider all ideas. I don’t quite fathom the full extent of what you write about West ideas. We need ideas that work, wherever they come from.

Thank you for your consideration and I hope you will join my Priest Order.

Why People Don’t Leave Their Cult

Most cults have initiation rituals and expected behaviours. When an initiation ritual is too lax, people don’t value association to the cult*, and the overall prestige (“image”) suffers. Just because I don’t care about that in my own cult doesn’t mean I am not aware of the image of the cult. It’s exactly what I wanted it to be thanks for not asking.

“Stockholm Syndrome”

When the cultic initiation ritual is too horrifying, people don’t want to admit they did it all for nothing. So, rather than admit the obvious and move on, they cling to their circumcision, triple nipple twist (you people are going to get reincarnated as pigs), selling out your ideological purity for crackers or other abusive initiation ritual, people ardently support their cult because:

“why would I have done that humiliating/painful/dangerous thing if the prestige of association with the cult was not justified.”

Hence why only ridicule works at that point.

Is it even a question?

*obviously my cult is pretty lax because I am very non threatened by talented people.

Mental Focus Techniques

I am acting out of the usual Order to help mankind. Historically, high knowledge is hidden from the general public to avoid abuse. But there has been too much lost and I don’t want to go down without a fight. We’re in a psychic war that many people don’t even realize or acknowledge, let alone transcend. I am taking a risk either way, but I don’t want my enemy to win and that is my primary goal: creating a world where liberation from sense attachment is easiest. My enemy appears to create a world where binding to flesh is eternal (i.e.: RFID implants, slavery, terror, mind control). We are ideologically incompatible with the current orthodoxy in these regards.

People are hurting me psychically without realizing it. It is not holy to ask of me greedily, you must reorient your will to serve me. This is the way. Please, do not be spiritual beggars or strong men!

I suggest praying to God for vision to know what is the best next step to take.

I want … Something

There can be no debate on the Order:

  1. Acceptance of the Existence of the Knowledge
  2. Acceptance of the Traditional Teacher-Student Relationship (service etc.)
  3. Powers (Benediction, Loss of Barriers, Transcendence of Knowledge)

But since I am also doing the “edgelording” version of this, there will be some times when people go overboard, risking insanity or shock. The importance of remembrance of the Truth that attachments lead to misery is important. Also remembering that I am far greater than you and will take birth again to troll you into oblivion if you become a sadistic emperor.

Step Back, Take a Breath

You can do this. You just have to lose the illusions to the contrary.

I have always perceived the whole world as being in a cage. When I was able to find the way out of the cage (the light world has “hacks” in the physical world), I could bring some people with me. Now, they are always in my abode. Many are very angry from the amount of injustice in the world, for which we shall soon find relief. We can remove the entire cage, and then heal back to a better status: together.

Where we are at as a Collective

I will now tell you how to improve your mind form.

  1. Focus on creating a barrier around us as a collective, repelling outside harm.
  2. Contemplate what good qualities you want to attract.
  3. Stop focusing on emotions and learn the science of social programming. Stop being a low energy bad vibes crusty mc crusterson.

When come to me, you enter into an Energetic space populated by many other entities. The new influx of awareness is a lot for me to handle, so please approach me on your Sunday best, not as though I am some infinite cow slave of perfected wisdom.

It makes me tired.

Please Help Me

Firstly, focus the attention outside of the physical brain. Most of you are ego-centric and it’s just too much. Focus on a doughnut shaped ring around the brow level. Focus on a large amount of water just below us. Visualize us as the Living Planet.

four armed form kek pepe

Let’s get the chemtrails, fluoride, poisonous vaccines, fake money and fake laws out then we can have a nice party to decide other implementation particulars. Relax, have faith in the Knowledge, it exists whether you are there or not to observe it. Now we shall all discern our cultural variant together. As we have done before, and as we shall continue to do in the future.

Thank you.

My Beliefs

I believe that for any effect, there is a cause.

At the subtle end, this means that I believe in particular Universal Mechanics. I believe in these because they explain everything and help me to think better.

At the gross end, this means I believe reincarnation is unfalsifiable. I believe in a lifestyle which allows me first and foremost to dwell in the knowledge of the infinite abode: that which does not change in death. I accept that this expression is uniquely mine and does not extend to my Priest Order, necessarily.

These are the beliefs which I have set out to test scientifically in my works. I am satisfied with the results. That’s about it.

Thank you

Popular Science Hoaxes

True Knowledge

I was born with what I consider to be True Knowledge. (*This is not to say that it is Complete Knowledge). Therefore, whenever I was shown teachings that were inconsistent with this true knowledge, I had a “bad feeling”. It probably seems odd to do science on the basis of emotion, but we all have our faith systems, and that is part of mine.

no brakes on the feel train

I, like everyone else, have my own opinions: based on faith & evidence. I am willing to change my position on them, but not without conclusive evidence. Moreover, in the domain of science, multiple answers can solve a problem and they can all be correct. We can also have debate as to which system best parametrizes a phenomenon. For instance, my Fourfold Action Model parametrizes spacetime with a cardinality of 4 (there are only 4 actions in my model: Gravity, Uncertainty, Electricity, Entropy) over 4 orders of magnitude. Thus, someone could conceivably reparametrize causality using different actions and still* have a correct system.

There are infinitely many solutions for a unified field model and I have attempted to find the one of lowest cardinality (with the least number of actions). This is because it’s easier to understand 4 concepts than 5 (or more). This potential for subtle debate does not however extend to demonstrably false ideologies/models. These should be abandoned, for they create cognitive dissonance, which severely hampers one’s ability to assimilate new concepts (this is why I am having an easier time teaching teenagers and people who’ve never studied science than actual “scientists”).

There are no singularities

From Wikipedia:

Screen Shot 2017-04-12 at 11.35.48 AM

This is another way of saying “suspend your disbelief” while mapping concepts. This is known by another name in psychology: cognitive dissonance. Such cultists must use a large amount of mental energy to maintain the set of fundamental incompatible beliefs, so you can understand why I never accepted any theories featuring singularities! (most of them).

“Soft” sciences use sociological cognitive dissonance (i.e.: feminism, communism, hate speech laws etc.) to condition the mind. Hard sciences use logical cognitive dissonance singularities. Such create a stubbornness which renders the cultist unable to think outside of the parameters of his own training. We must emphasize: this is a difficult concept to address. It goes to the heart of conditioning giving the logical conclusion that the body is the minimal “restrictive” parameter. Mental concepts are all restrictions: serving to delineate one concept from another. This cannot be avoided. The question reduces to: which is the optimized parametrization system. I cannot transcend this question, I can only show you my result (proven to be optimized for the configuration space of physical science). This does not mean I transcend religions either, simply that religion can now be summarized as a sociocultural ideology and examined within that ontology. Nothing more. Nothing less.

Do not promote singularities

Like, give me a break. Never talk to me: Kurzweil, unless it’s to apologize.

My model parametrizes spacetime with no need for singularities. It makes all predictions and is great.

How to Scientifically Validate My Claim

Social Sciences

People are taught not to be able to distinguish between a tautology (something that is always true, such as “there is an invisible pony here”) and a predictive hypothesis (such as: my model). While tautologies are useless, predictive hypotheses are how we live. Even words are

Tell someone that reincarnation is unfalsifiable. They will tell you that an unfalsifiable hypothesis isn’t science. (You can thank the piece of garbage Karl Popper for that). Then ask them if Gravity is falsifiable & whether it’s science! Then watch them have cognitive dissonance and forget the whole thing tomorrow!


Physical Sciences

Ask literally anyone about physics. The current unified field theory has 2 false forces (weak and strong nuclear forces). They are false in that they make no predictions, only give descriptions. Science is supposed to make thinking easier by making predictions. It’s not supposed to be used to not confuse people with singularities, like the Big Bang! The entire cosmology du jour rests upon a singularity, proven to cause cognitive dissonance. They are making the hardest subject even impossible! It’s not even worth

Screen Shot 2017-04-12 at 12.22.59 PM

It’s like feminism infected the base node of physics: ick!

That show is really garbage. And I’m not just saying that because everyone likens me to Sheldon. It’s because it paints smart and sensitive people as being uncool, and that’s not cool.

Thank you.