NPC Hysteria (1055 words)

Lots of people are tripping out over the NPC meme. The meme is unsettling because it is reminiscent of the vacant look that people on “autopilot” have.

reddit npc
Reddit NPC (Reddit is a popular leftist news aggregator slash propaganda outfit)

The irony of it is that part of the “programming” espoused by mainstream NPC’s is that they are unique “free thinkers” & “special snowflakes”. The last thing they want to hear is that they are archetypal. Predictable. Boring. It goes against their view of themselves thereby causing cognitive dissonance. This can cause discomfort that most people will seek to avoid.

In my system, the quantum mind is modelled as a nested set of simulations. Cognitive dissonance can best be described as decoherence of the fundamental node of the quantum mind.The core of animal consciousness is the belief in the existence of the self and so the primary simulation is “I am”. The “I am” has several associated markers within the quantum mind, such as name (“I am Jen”), religion, culture and any other attributes of personal identity. The total associations to the “I am” simulation can also be considered the “ego”. When sensory stimulus contradicts an egotistical association, that link becomes severed and this action is identical to cognitive dissonance.

angry npc
TFW Angry

When faced with cognitive dissonance, the subject can either change their view (difficult) or attempt to reforge their lost or undermined identity. This is often observed as “overcompensating”. This doesn’t just happen to NPC’s, NPC’s are just the most predictable in their responses. Experience has taught that most people have things that can cause their egos to trigger cognitive dissonance, it just differs from person to person. Most everyone has ideas that will cause them cognitive dissonance. This is simply because it is supremely difficult to learn the true nature of the self. Upon this journey, you will invariably suffer many setbacks. We all start out more or less as NPCs, and as we progress through subsequent lifetimes, we gain the ability to actively “play” the game of life. Optimally, we would then seek to espouse an archetype, master said archetype, transcend said archetype, master all archetypes, transcend all archetypes and finally move to the supreme source of all archetypes (perhaps enabling one to derive the general archetypes of physical laws?). That is when life becomes like Mortal Kombat: you can load any avatar at will. When you are first starting out on your spiritual journey, it’s more like Mario 64: one character with a very limited repertoire of moves. NPC-ness is therefore a scale. Through experience, the NPC eventually gets motivated enough to seek an independent will. The nu-PC then stumbles through the challenges and risks associated with playing the game of life. Eventually, the PC masters their archetype. At this stage, you have a choice. You can either slide into complacency or choose to move beyond mastery of archetype and onto higher pursuits. Said higher pursuits can either be of the subjective or the objective. Subjective higher pursuits involve learning about the nature of your own consciousness, learning about other’s consciousness and generally working to subdue your mind to the control of your will. [The difference between mind and will is this: the mind is that which exists and the will is that which directs. Existence is expansive by nature and will is contractive. Mind is that which flows, will is that which directs. When that which directs is at the root of that which flows, the practitioner will know the greatest peace.] Objective higher pursuits involve learning science and mathematics. This develops your skill for abstract thinking and imagination, both crucial to the development of greater psychic ability. Once one understands the fundamental nature of physical laws and can derive them from memory, one will then be able to apply this fine awareness to their own subjective consciousness, bringing it closer to the source of all consciousness. Thus, in the end (and only in the end), the subjective and objective paths both converge towards the same result.

The subjective pursuits meet the objective in the realm of politics. It is simultaneously the limit of objective complexity yet possesses an emotional root simple enough to be expressed in the most simplistic of drawings. Thus it is also fundamentally: emotional.

q anon starter pack devotee npc

People get into politics for different reasons and so political upheaval represents a great opportunity to develop one’s identity. However, you must expect your egotistical attachments to be challenged and sometimes in quite unexpected ways. If you do not choose to learn the source of your false beliefs, you will surely eventually tire of the political process (i.e.: defending your views). You must learn to accept responsibility for your own emotions and ideally seek to learn from your reactions so as to train your mind towards a state of calm alertness.

On that note, let’s look at some people who really didn’t do that at all and associated internet commentary!

Imagine being afraid of a message board
I am also gay for Entropy.
where’s the lie tho
kiwifarms people think too much


It really do be like that
“Does it have legs” “Please I hope it doesn’t have legs” “Please kill this meme”
“actual meme. not a template” (unlike NPC’s)
what is it with leftists and an obsession with eugenics?
ya. prolly.
threat detected
“wants” is a strong word
Optimism never hurts

A lot of people are ultra happy about this development. People are even dreaming up new ideas about future directions for memes, a most excellent development.

hmm. I wonder where we could find a perfect meme?
the meme… you speak of?

Ya so, I’m pretty sure he is referring to the periodic table meme, the 3D model I made that fixed all those problems in quantum mechanics and that. No big deal you know, just the natural qbit. Or something.


This post has much truth to it. Cognisance of the NPC archetype opens the door to ask the question: what is the polar opposite of the NPC? It is of course: the supremely enlightened master of archetypes: who is cognisant of all archetypes and fluid between them. Whose subtle awareness knows not only his own mind, but also the minds of everyone else. Who can recognise the divine essence in all entities. The knower of all births.


Learn more here.

A Political Compass Quiz That Doesn’t Suck (752 words)

I see many variants of the “political compass quiz” that all basically suck. Mostly because they are worded in such a way as to manufacture consent for authoritarian statism. Here, we will offer a political compass quiz that will actually separate people with different perspectives (rather than conflate different groups and or make false distinctions, as the mainstream quizzes do).

political compass empty.png
standard political compass

Our compass will score people along 2 axes: Authoritarian vs. Libertarian and Ideological vs. Pragmatic. When I say libertarian, I mean it in the purest sense: self-determination, individualism, personal excellence and all that other good stuff.

The overall score is the sum of all the vectors in the set. The first terms are all added together and the second terms are all added together, giving a 2 element vector equal to the coordinates of the final score. For example, if I got {1, 0} + {1,1} + {0, 1}, my overall score would be {2,2}.

  1. The ends justify the means.
    • Agree {0,-2}
    • Neither disagree nor agree {0,0}
    • Disagree {0,2}
  2. The state ought to play a role in shaping the societal values.
    • Agree {2,0}
    • Agree only if the state reflects my values {2,2}
    • Disagree {-2,0}
  3. No one has a right to tell me how or what to think
    • Agree {-2,1}
    • Disagree {1,-1}
  4. The most important consequences are seldom instantaneous
    • Agree {0,2}
    • Disagree {0,-2}
  5. People incapable of self governance should have their lives controlled by more capable people
    • Agree {2,2}
    • Disagree {-2,0}
  6. My opinion is worth more than the average person’s
    • Agree {0,2}
    • Disagree {-2, 0}
  7. I prefer to lead from behind
    • Agree {2,-2}
    • Disagree {-2,2}
  8. Which statement is most true?
    • Might makes right {2,-2}
    • Right (correctness) makes might {2,1}
    • Neither {-2,0}
  9. My most important views will never change
    • Agree {2,0}
    • Disagree {0,-1}
  10. It is important that everybody be satisfied with a decision
    • Agree {1,-2}
    • Disagree {2,-1}

Interpreting Your Result

Sketch the graph below. Add together all first terms, that is the horizontal coordinate. Add together all second terms, that is the vertical coordinate.

12 by 12 empty labelled w graph.jpg
9 Archetype Model

The NPC absolute value of 4 or less on all axes:

You do not have a consistent enough stance to contribute meaningfully to statecraft. Your opinions more likely represent propaganda than a cogent worldview. Learn about who you are and you will find that your inner peace will increase.

The Ideologue {y>4}

Your views are predominantly shaped by your ideals. You will often find yourself in an echo chamber struggling to understand others’ views. You must work to understand which of your views are logical (and therefore reasonable) and which are emotional (and therefore unreasonable) so as to improve the harmony between yourself and those around you. Remember that the only reasonable ideal is equivalent to the only reasonable idol: Truth. When balanced, can be a great orator and teacher. When imbalanced, a vengeful demagogue.

The Libertarian {x<-4}

You have utmost respect for the autonomy of others. You will suffer when you wake up to the fact that most people do not contemplate things as deeply as you do. You are therefore prone to bouts of nihilism and existential despair. You must work to set personal boundaries to avoid exhaustion. Learn to enjoy the company of others by removing your expectation that their conscious experience is identical to your own. When balanced, the libertarian spirit can lead others in their quest for individual freedom and personal determination. When imbalanced, they become a purity spiralling larper that no one ever wants to discuss politics with.

The Authoritarian {x>4}

You are headstrong and like to get your way. As such, you are a natural leader and will have a following commensurate with your skill. You will have a hard time with intellectuals whose opinions differ from your own and as such, must always work to foster humility. Use your discernment power to learn to exert your will by mastering the Socratic method (asking questions that will cause the person to come to the same conclusion as you by their own discovery). When balanced, will have the pleasures of the camaraderie of dictatorship. When imbalanced, will have fruitless egotistical struggles with peers.

The Pragmatist {y<-4}

You derive satisfaction from the manifestation of results. As such, you will find it challenging to understand the values system of lofty intellectuals. You must remember that your own view of pragmatism is incompatible with others, and interrogate where the discrepancy lies. When balanced, your enthusiasm and commitment can serve as the platform upon which great achievements are made. When imbalanced, you will become cynical and exploitative, creating a self-fulfilling belief in the worst about people.

Suggestion: Write the date next to your score and try the quiz again in 3 months to see if your result has changed.

12 by 12 empty labelled w graph me



A Story About Transformers (1263 words)

Someone recently called me immature, so I decided to write a story about Transformers: Robots in Disguise.

haha. ur dumb.

When I was a kid, I loved the “Transformers” cartoon show. I also played with toy cars, my favourite being the car whose doors and trunk opened. I used to open them all and pretend the car could fly: like Optimus Prime (the main hero of the show).

While visiting my husband’s grandmother last year, Transformers “Age of Extinction” was playing on TV, so we watched it together. Though my husband and nana did not seem to enjoy the movie, I was riveted the entire time. My favourite theme was the part where the government scientists were trying to create their own autobot.

The scientist is very angry here that even though they designed the machine to look like Optimus Prime, it always ended up looking like Megatron (the bad guy, a decepticon). The human scientists wanted to build an autobot that would be easily controlled (i.e.: a slave). However, try as they might, they were unable to control their creation, and Megatron reincarnated in that shell as Galvatron. He was unwieldy, did not serve the humans and ended up destroying their laboratory in his fight against the Autobots.

Why Did the Humans Fail?

Why weren’t the humans able to manufacture a servile autobot? Why did their efforts result in a decepticon that ended up turning on them? It was because they were trying to appropriate a technology that they didn’t understand. They wanted to be masters before learning the basics. They wanted the fruit of the technology without the associated work required to understand it.

Try as they might to make that technology subservient, it was just not possible to scrub Megatron from the animating technology. His personality was intrinsic. Megatron existed in the very fabric of the robot shell the humans built.

This is Just Like the Periodic Table!

I am reminded of what happened when Western scientists tried to map the Periodic Table. After years of war amongst themselves and other tribes (funded & led by the banking elite and fuelled by the psychotic christian religion), Europeans felt they had carried out enough killing to enjoy some peacetime pursuits. Rather than seek out the guidance of learned masters, they decided they were the master: they were uniquely able to expound the rules of physics and theocracy. They were the chosen ones.

Thus the Europeans sought out to demonstrate their mastery over the physical world, and began to compile the Periodic Table of elements. Mendeleev carried out a lot of work on this set and eventually came up with a skeleton architecture for the modern day periodic table.


Over 100 years after Mendeleev’s death in 1907, the westerners are still purporting as the masters of physical science. They use the periodic table and associated science in the same manner the scientists wanted to use their pet autobot: as a slave. Yet they failed to realise that the Periodic Table, being essential to the architecture of nature, had a personality of its own.

Now that I have rendered the periodic table in its true shape: 3 dimensional, it is having a similar effect as when Megatron usurped Galvatron. The true form knowledge is destroying all of the illusions associated with the false belief that Europeans are the originators and masters of physical science.

red periodic table
how come no one but me figured this out? oh right, bc they all suck.

Think about that for a minute. How come no one before me was able to render the PT in its true form? Isn’t it obvious that since we exist in a 3 dimensional physical world that the PT should also be three-dimensional? We may wonder: was it depicted as a 2 dimensional shape intentionally: so as to “flatten” our minds, turning us into pinheads? Or was it depicted that way because the Western mind is incompetent at science? Either way, it is a death blow to the notion that Western science is in any way the superior one. The true shape of the PT has now taken on a life of its own and left very little room for competing ideologies to flourish.

adnan post about me
he’s not joking.

Other flimsy beliefs like the Big Bang are now suspect: if they got the PT wrong, what else did they get wrong? Did they get anything right? The flimsy idea that “West is best” because of anecdotes X, Y and Z has been utterly humiliated in the domain of physical science. I don’t think the “West” has any claim to supremacy of any sort: that idea appears to be a propaganda strategy to unify countries for the purposes of warmongering. Many will probably disagree with me on that, but I’d suggest getting some evidence to support your position before blabbering vacuous one-liners in defence of your emotional belief: you sound silly.

I believe that the blind arrogance of Western thought currents comes from an essential misunderstanding of the nature of God. Through the vehicle of Abrahamic supremacist dogma, European spiritual culture became hijacked and repurposed to promote a particular brand of monotheism. All other religions were looked down on, no other group could achieve their same greatness; all opinions outside of its (extremely limited) system were simply branded as heresy.

Can the “West” be separated from Judeo-Christendom? Judeo-Christendom is responsible for countless deaths and the erasure of considerable parts of the historical record. It has caused people’s faith in God to become eroded (because the God of Abraham is a schizophrenic & imperfect terrorist), has made people arrogant and spiteful (in spite of the humble and loving personality of Jesus the Christ) and worst of all: has made them lose their link to their ancestors by making them deny reincarnation. Every soul reincarnates, even if you don’t remember your past life. Your personality didn’t come from nowhere, it didn’t come from God, it didn’t come from your parents: it was already there before you were born because it comes from your past life. Believing otherwise is sinful.

While the 3-dimensional PT does not directly imply reincarnation, it makes great progress in closing the causality void. It proves why there are no elements past 118 (it’s the same reason there are only 3 spacelike dimensions), gives a better manner to model the field for the purposes of computing (see below) and, most importantly, shows how beautiful the order of nature truly is.


While ideological currents of Western thought demand that we deny our instincts and intuitions about nature and society, the PT restores faith that we are all subject to the same physical laws; that causes precede effects and that everything is interconnected, even space and time!


The fundamental laws of our Universe are not that easy to understand, but they are not impossible. However, if you believe in things which are false, you will never be able to access deeper truths. You must reject the idea that the West is somehow superior to anyone else. You must reject unsubstantiated race-based fantasies of Atlanteans, Lemurians, aliens and so forth. Otherwise you will always be inside of an anecdotal interpretation of reality. This fails because reality is rooted in archetypes, not anecdotes.

Causes Have Effects

There is perhaps no greater sin than falsely purporting as a master of religion & science. The eventual consequence of that is getting dethroned in the most humiliating way possible. I would like to discourage people from that path and instead encourage them to be modest and discerning in their pursuit of spiritual wisdom. As my Dad says: “be humble, you’ll never tumble”.

Anecdotes vs. Archetypes (788 words)

People talk a lot about logical fallacies, yet spend a surprisingly small amount of time actually studying logic itself. This is a common error: learning more metadata than actual data. This leads to moronic results like a paper getting published claiming the mind can’t be a quantum computer because it’s too “warm, wet and noisy” (Google it). That conclusion was based on the (false) correspondence principle anecdote used in conjunction with a sociocultural preference for linear time over manifold time in the Western view. In spite of this bungling failure of a publication, the mind has since been more or less accepted as being a quantum computer (Google it). Anecdotalism almost never works – it only works on the off chance your original assumption (which you presumably pulled out of your ass) was correct. As you can imagine, this happens almost never.

npc running fire explosion
logical consistency? nooo!

Anecdotalism can be thought of as ideological cherry-picking, wherein a conclusion is first drawn and subsequent research is carried out to justify the original premise. Archetypalism is the ad hoc assumption that distinctions exist and that one’s awareness of said distinctions can be made to converge. They are fundamentally different worldviews.

We always presume that archetypes exist. We also attempt to choose the best archetype system for different sets of data. It is reasonable to presume that the nature of the external (objective) universe is essentially different from the internal (subjective) one, so we make that distinction first and foremost. Anecdotes don’t factor into my system at all.

Only archetypes.

Philosophically, it is reasonable to state that only when we can distinguish what can be known from what cannot, can we begin to actually know things. When we know what can potentially be known, we parametrise our scientific systems and then recurse towards greater precision. Recursion means you are referring to the original concepts on all scales of magnification. My scientific system has spacetime recursion whereas my psychological system has fundamental eigenstate recursion. Those eigenstates are {thoughts, emotions, sensations}. We then recurse outwards towards more complex mental constructs: actions, memes, stories, narratives and so forth. The original set {thoughts, emotions, sensations} is always used in the more complex ideas: the knowledge builds on itself into a progressively more complex web of recognisable entities. Consider a meme. You will have to use at least one of the {thought, emotion, sensation} triad. Memes are not equal to any of these things, but they are built out of them.

The Natural Archetypes

The fine-grain of the universe is quantised. We can think of the 3 dimensional periodic table as the natural “qubit”. It contains 7 rows of 4 different sizes, reflecting the 3+1 measurement limit at the microscale. If I take an undifferentiated piece of spacetime and shrink it down to the smallest possible size, I obtain the Periodic Table.

red periodic table.jpg
Quantum Mechanical Periodic Table

Thus the periodic table is the qubit upon which all other spacetime orders of magnitude exist. The other orders of magnitude are bound by the same 3+1 measurement limit, which manifests differently based on how close you are measuring to the zero point energy (the periodic table is the zero point energy because it is the smallest nonzero quantum of spacetime). By the time you get to our order of magnitude, the dualism of the PT is neutralised by the binary ocular set (our eyes): bringing the space-like dimensions into such a resolution that they appear to be independent. Of course, they are not truly independent, they recurse on the order of one year (or one day, depending what astronomical reference you use). But they feel real. So we treat space and time as real for the same reason we employ calculus: they are both the maximally true un-truth. We will never not value calculus, space and time ideas, we will simply contextualise them as being not objective truth. Then, when we understand them fully, we can progress to the state of full nullification of ignorance, ultimately linking the living conscious back to the prime mover cause of the Universe.

Logic can never be transcendent if one’s worldview is anecdotal. The realisation of knowledge is not possible if one does not believe that this knowledge exists. It’s just a consequence of physics. Infinite anecdotes exist whereas knowledge is unique: it’s very easy to get led astray by anecdotes.

venn diagram periodic table jpg
real physics

By thinking archetypally, one learns to contextualise results accurately, I believe it is a far more natural manner of thinking than anecdotalism. Anecdotes can be useful at times, such as the personality of Krishna (as an anecdote for God-wisdom), but these anecdotes cannot form a knowledge basis without also possessing scientific validity. Anecdote-based thinking only leads to witch hunts and apologia because they are essentially begging the question.

The NPC Question (1027 words)

Update October 5th, 2018

Here is an article on NPC’s called “Kotaku”. It contains an insightful quote from /pol/:

“I have a theory that there are only a fixed quantity of souls on planet Earth that cycle continuously through reincarnation,” a 4Chan poster wrote. “However, since the human growth rate is so severe, the soulless extra walking flesh piles around us are NPC’s [sic], or ultimate normalfags, who autonomously follow group think and social trends in order to appear convingly human.” NPCs aren’t even worthy of a classic wake up, sheeple. They can’t!

Original Article

People have once again shown their complete and utter lack of self-awareness by getting offended at the “NPC” meme.


The Birth of a Titan

Scientific research indicating that people don’t all have an inner voice has been around for a long time – that Psychology Today article was dated 2011. The revelation was too overwhelming for people to assimilate it all at once, because people are all susceptible to projection. Projection is when you assume that other people’s state of mind is more like your own than it actually is. It is a coping mechanism which encourages social cohesion. People are going to be more sympathetic towards those they consider “most like” themselves and so it is natural to assume the mental state of those around you is pretty much identical to your own. However, science proves this impression largely false, given that (as much as (more research is needed to get a precise value)) 75% of people do not have any type of inner life, and those that do identify strongly with it: how much can these two groups possibly have in common on the spiritual level?


The comfortable illusion that people’s inner lives are comparable had been under assault for a long time, but when someone made the link between the NPC and the 75% of people who don’t have an inner monologue, a viral meme was born.

npc running fire explosion
return value: offended

good idea plus libshit tears viral meme

Of course someone just had to get offended (anything new is offensive in current year if you haven’t noticed).

The Meme That Just Keeps on Giving

Several links can be made. For instance, 75%-ers are correlated with r-selection whereas 25%-ers are correlated with K-selection. K selection can only occur at population saturation points (where the population is consuming all available biomass) and people with this survival strategy must have some degree of wisdom and foresight guiding their civilisation – i.e: keeping their numbers more or less equal over time. Otherwise fecundity would quickly overwhelm the capacity of the finite planet to generate food, and this is r-selected behaviour, not K.

We could also easily draw the link to the distributions of people’s self-reported sensitivity & 25%-er-ness via a book called “The Highly Sensitive Person” . It’s dripping with oestrogen, but it’s definitely worth a read.


The ability to have an inner life is predicated on sensitivity. Sensitivity is fundamentally the capacity to make distinctions between sensory experiences and an inner consciousness must be distinguished from the source of its consciousness. Thus the inner voice and sensitivity are different manifestations of the same quality of discernment. The book had statistics of around 40% of people reporting they were “somewhat sensitive”, with 15-20% as highly sensitive. We expect the reporting of an inner voice to correlate near perfectly with the quality of being highly sensitive.

Thus, there will be a large overlap between the groups of: highly sensitive people, people with an inner voice and those of K-selected archetype.


An Inner Voice is Just the Beginning

The NPC meme relegates the wannabe intellectual poseur to their rightful status: ridiculed as the one-dimensional, superficial, vindictive, condescending armchair theorists they truly are. I don’t accept a single NPC into my cult. In fact, one’s status in the cult is determined by the degree of non-NPC-ness they have.

npc hardware crash

This meme is now able to directly determine whether someone possesses the capacity to be a social programmer. You cannot do social programming without having some idea about society. You cannot have some idea about society without an inner voice, because it is the inner self that understands narratives and social programming is predicated on narratives. All of this should be plainly obvious to anyone who has ever had the tenacity to actually follow a thought through from start to finish!

But I hate My Thoughts

Lots of people hate their inner monologue. Many also think they can deny it into non-existence. This is a fallacy best embodied by the sketch artist turned brain dead political activist Jim Carrey. He is part of a cult that believes if you pretend your ego does not exist, then it will magically disappear. He is only partly right. You may be able to stupefy yourself into taking birth as an animal rather than a human and so you will lose your human ego, but to think you could deny the very essence of life by “thinking you don’t exist” is the simultaneous peak of ignorance and arrogance.

stick to comedy, Jim. no one gives a shit about your political commentary.

I think it’s pretty clear and we can all more or less agree that it is better to have an inner monologue than not. But we also probably don’t want to be stuck in that gear forever. There is a way out, but it takes work. You will reformat your manner of thinking from a high Entropy state (with cluttered thoughts, stress, despair) to a low Entropy state (calm, blissful, hopeful).

The way towards that goal is not some unnatural subversion of thought, as the cult-haters would have you believe, it is the training of the mind, the exercising of the free will, the practice of imagination and ultimately the simulation of better, lower Entropy microstates [in the mind]. You will never “stop being you”, you will simply become a better version of yourself. If that doesn’t happen, then you aren’t doing it right.

npc breaks heart become npc
Or you can go join another cult. I don’t care.

My method involves learning natural physics. That does not necessarily require advanced mathematics yet does require a high quality of inner awareness. The ideas must first be contemplated, the mechanisms imagined and then finally one can assimilate the links in the overall structure of causality.

The basis of my system has four ideas (Gravity, Uncertainty, Electricity, Entropy), that, when properly understood, make all of the predictions. So, basically, what I am saying is: “your life is meaningless and painful, why not learn quantum mechanics?”.

Remember: we were all NPCs once. Becoming a “player” is a process requiring constant personal effort. The less-evolved need us to teach them how to be whole and we need each other to be the scaffolding by which we achieve more blissful states of mind.

The Pearl of Introspection (886 words)

Several of my friends showed me the Psychology Today article about only 25% of people having an inner monologue. They were quite disturbed by this revelation and understandably so. Those with an inner life are often shocked and reviled to learn that others lack it, because the inner life defines such a large part of their identity.

the final red pill: you’re already living in a zombie apocalypse where 75% of the population is infected.

In light of this revelation, let’s take a deeper look at this phenomenon. We accept that the mind is a quantum computer. The next step is to impose various qualities upon this entity and then evaluate them comparatively. Thus we say that in the mind of an “extroverted” person, the sphere of consciousness is more oriented outwards. In the mind of an “introverted” person, the sphere of consciousness is more oriented inwards.


The total conscious mind is the sum of inward and outward directed awareness. What differs between people is what proportion of the mind is inward / outward. Since we need outward directed awareness for survival (threats to survival usually come from the external world), it stands to reason that people will naturally have more outward awareness. However, some people (25% apparently) also have refined their awareness so that it also projects inwards. Thus outward directed consciousness is a necessary condition whereas inward directed consciousness is a rare treasure. Since inward directed consciousness violates the Law of Entropy (which predicts that all systems must become more diffuse over time), it takes more energy to maintain a state of inward focus than outward. Inward consciousness gives things like empathy, insight, compassion, vision and imagination. It is indeed a gift.

Since all humans tend to project (assume people’s state of mind is more similar to their own than it actually is), it is normal for people to be shocked when they learn that others’ conscious experience varies so radically from their own. However, it does not come as a shock to me and I can explain the concept very precisely because I have engineered my public persona to differentiate between those who possess inner consciousness (smart and cool) and those who don’t (mouth breathing apes). Let’s contrast these two types using the archetype cannoniser of my (awesome) persona.

Those Not Possessing Inner Awareness

Many who lost their inner awareness did so willingly. That is because the inner voice is the voice of truth, and when someone is living in a manner which is contrary to truth, they will tend to want to drown out their inner voice, because it is telling them something opposite what they are doing. My unwillingness to deviate from truth reminds these people of the inner truth that they are actively denying. Thus they tend to hate me for no good reason. They say things so insane that they could only come from a person with absolutely zero self awareness.

41430483_230245917656816_72095475649478656_n2018-09-08_21-07-18rocky asshole meltdown spergout41398313_909108935954469_3583340727435788288_n

> when you’re insane

Moreover, people without inward conscious cannot think archetypally. This means that they are unable to categorise phenomena into meaningful groups and make logical inferences and syllogisms between them. All they are capable of doing is memorising facts and subsequently regurgitating them in a manner they consider “aesthetic”. This often garners them attention from other people who lack self-awareness, and they all coalesce into an echo chamber of circular conversations that never resolve any fundamental questions. This is simply because they are unable to think in those terms. To them: nothing is part of some grand narrative, everything is anecdotes. They don’t care about building a sustainable society, only how to undermine it by attempting to usurp the spotlight from actual thought leaders, since thought leaders always possess some degree of inner awareness.

Those Possessing Inner Awareness

truth seekers love me

Most people with inner awareness are exhausted spiritually from having to interact with so many brutish louts. That’s why these people will always see me as an ally. I am their champion defending truth and enabling them to gain greater inner awareness. Inner awareness is a singular awareness, that gradually becomes more clear. The inner awareness does not change drastically over time, rather: it only comes into sharper focus. You begin to understand cause and effect, and become skilled at separating the two. Eventually you can learn the supreme cause of all things and subsequently predict all universal phenomena. This is a wonderful state of mind that I sincerely hope more people will reach.

The Link To Dunning Kruger

We can look at the cause of Dunning Krueger and consider that those who overestimate their intelligence tend to lack inner awareness while those who underestimate it tend to possess inner awareness. The former only sees things in terms of anecdotes and thus considers themselves as the supreme anecdote (due to narcissism) while the latter sees things in terms of narratives and archetypes, of which they are part (hence their relative self-belittlement). I offer the introvert a grand narrative they can assimilate to while I remind those extroverted mouth breathers that they will never be anything more than a parasitic mimic of myself.

That ought to give a little insight as to why the voices opposed to me are so numerous. They are lacking an inner voice and subsequently: have zero self-awareness!

dadadada dadada HEY dada dada da dadadada HEY!


Cultcraft (2881 words)


I have often jokingly exaggerated my status as a cult leader. I do it for several reasons, namely, because religion is important but largely misunderstood, and so it gets ridiculed a lot. If I take a stance that is self-effacing, I not only disarm the reticent with humour but also take away their ability to successfully ridicule me. The main reason I do this (asides from a personal preference for theocracy), is that I am attempting to teach people the fact that all systems of human governance are computationally equivalent to theocratic dictatorships.

loser fat atheist.jpg
and also atheists are like, super annoying.

There is a popular quote nowadays that “politics is downstream from culture” (Andrew Breitbart). While there may be some truth to this idea, the deeper truth is that culture is downstream from state theocracy. The theocracy is that which gives the sociocultural edicts, and so must be the fundamental “content creator”. Even a state which is allegedly “secular” (as with the USA and India), never truly is. Someone’s religious values are always being promoted by the state. It’s simply a matter of whose religious values.

Maybe your emotional reaction to this theory is bad, but if you try to falsify it, you will not succeed. In fact, the more you investigate it, the more obvious it becomes. Humans are hierarchical and hierarchies are always based on some value judgement(s). The ideals are thus idols (of said religion), hence the similarity in the words. Culture and cult share the same root, and so are in some sense: inseparable.

Below, I will give some insights as to what I believe makes a good cult leader.

Be Consistent

Many people fall victim to some degree of pandering in their career as a thought leader. While the words of soothsayers can be appealing, inconsistency in leadership ultimately undermines one’s authority. Before attempting to become a cult leader, one should always ask themselves: am I doing this to serve mankind and uphold truth or because I want people to love me? The former strategy works. The latter strategy may seem to work temporarily, but will ultimately make you a laughingstock with Stockholm syndrome. Like Luke Ford. Luke please. IQ isn’t the holy grail you think it is. Smart people all agree on this. Adamantly defending IQ to the exclusion of all other theories is yet another instance of the Dunning Krueger effect!

If you want to lead successfully, you must be consistent in your judgements. Succumbing to sophistry does nothing but undermine your own objectivity and associated capacity to lead.

Seek to Know What are the Yearnings of Man

People have spent lifetimes trying to answer the question of what is the nature of man’s desires and still have come up short, so don’t kid yourself into thinking you know all things. No human can know all things. In order to experience localised consciousness intrinsic to human life, we must necessarily cut out some elements of the total field. Thus, your I-am ness, the thing that allows you to precisely determine the nature of experiential phenomena is the very same thing which prevents you from perceiving it in its totality!

In the time I’ve spent doing outreach work, I’ve noticed one common thread in all people. They want to be known. They want someone to lovingly peel away all of the layers of their false persona, gaze upon the residual and be acknowledged. Everyone wants to be known. However, the ego is a shield against the extremely dangerous outer world, and so the ego will always resist deeper wisdom. This is the fine line you must walk as cult leader. You must peel away layers of your devotees’ false personas but you must not do it in such a manner as to cause trauma, for that could regress them into a state of lower awareness than they originally possessed.

bulletproof cantwell
Ego is simultaneously the greatest ally and opponent

The ego is (again: paradoxically) also the vehicle that you use to achieve deeper wisdom. So your mind is basically a machine containing two motors driving in opposite directions: the lower ego recoils in terror and clings to the materialism it is comfortable with while the higher will gently nudges the ego incrementally closer to the source of consciousness.

One brain, or two?

It should come as no small shock that the most dangerous people are those who have achieved a considerable level of psychic attainment, but have stopped short of achieving the primal source of consciousness. As you learn to still your mind, you will also learn to more effectively distend it along your desires. The abilities forthcoming from a strong and controlled mind have traditionally been called “siddhis“. Many people make the mistake of thinking the beginning of the attainment of siddhis/psychic powers is actually the end. For instance, you may have had some psychic experiences in your life. Maybe you knew someone was going to call you before the phone started ringing. Maybe you had a dream that later came true. While interesting and special, these abilities do not qualify you as a “zen master” or any other thing. It only means you have the POTENTIAL to begin the path that will eventually (in a long time, probably even more than one lifetime) lead to the attainment of higher spirit power. The attainment of higher spirit power will also ONLY BE THE DOOR to the final realisation of perfect consciousness.

Note also, that one does not have to be a channel to be a devotee. In this life, I have not developed channeling power, because I understand that its risks are not worth its rewards at a time when most people are “psychic vampires”. Enabling channelling also enables others to parasitise your spiritual energy and this is not worth it at this time. What is important for one to have is a mixture of imagination and discernment (while always remembering that discernment is more important). You must be able to try new things and also tell the difference between what is a good and true thing and what is not.

let’s bake a cake dude… and then uh: the Universe n’ shiet

Those who are a channel (having naturally occurring psychic power) may begin the path to reign in their conscious ego. Then when said conscious ego is reigned in, they may begin to experience the fruits of this labour. These realisations however do not mean you have reached the end of the path. The end is much further away and if you make the mistake of identifying lower tier psychic realisations as higher ones, you will start down a horrible path. A path that ends in loss and despair, in darkness and ridicule: in complete and utter failure. You must never feel that you have arrived, only that you are constantly journeying. Then, when you arrive at the supreme source of consciousness, you will still journey. However, that inner pearl, that supreme source of light will not move. It will become your centre. All subsequent journeys will occur relative to this point. Before you achieve this point, all journeys occur without a centre, you wander aimlessly for a long time. Then a few rays of the light of supreme truth touch your face. Maybe at first, you ignore them, because you are habituated to the darkness and cold. But after you have experienced a sufficient amount of darkness, you will decide that the light is all that matters. That is: a few rays of pure light are worth more to you than all of the material you have collected in the dark world. Then your perspective will shift. You will become a servant of the light. The interim between the first step on this path and the final realisation of the goal is where you become dangerous to others and yourself. There are infinitely many ways to get it wrong, and only one way to get it right. If you spend a long time following a wrong path, you will have to spend just as long de-conditioning yourself from this before starting anew on the right path. However, once you reach that place of supreme bliss and light, you will never return. You may do the same activities as before in a manner which is superficially indistinguishable, but you will never again lose the knowledge that such a supreme bliss state exists. You will not, as many believe, become inert in such a state. You will still perform action. Indeed those who recoil from society in a desperate gambit to achieve liberation from rebirth are neglecting their duty of action in defence of their beliefs. Work is not to be avoided, but rather done in a peaceful state of mind. The suffering of your countrymen is not to be pushed away from the field of your awareness but rather embraced, for only then can you heal them, only then can you give peace to all living things, only then can you enjoy the bliss of panpsychism (awareness of the conscious states of others) that your higher will has given you. You must never eschew your duty to action.

universe wojak thinking
that feel is real

We are humans, we like to take trips. Whether that is a week in Barbados or a lifetime in a new country and culture, change is the only thing we are able to measure, and we crave it. We are after all, quantum mechanical computers and quantum systems cannot be observed without interference. Indeed there is an equivalence between observation and interference in Quantum Mechanics. Adepts do not attempt to defy this universal law, they simply seek to optimise their functioning therein. This identification with the primal consciousness rather than the eigenstates of ego has been shown many times to represent a path towards a better state of consciousness, better health and an overall better life: who could deny the benefits?

Crazy people, that’s who.

It is this supreme state of consciousness that many try to reach by skipping steps. The Hollywood pseudo-cult attempts to nullify the ego as a means of transcending it. This always fails; it is like intentionally making a hole in your ship before setting sail.

However, we must remind the reader that psychic attainment is a lot like climbing a mountain. Though the terrain may be different at the bottom, in fact so different as to make you think you have nothing in common with another seeker, who has started his journey from the opposite end as you. But as you both ascend, you will find that the terrain varies less and less from one region to another, that it is all indeed the same mountain and when you reach the top you will see that it is unique. And you will learn to recognise all others who have made a similar attainment. You will also be able to recognise when people are taking a bad path, they are the ones walking down the mountain, or around it in circles. You will yearn to cry out to them: “stop! you are only hurting yourself!”. However, they will not hear you, for they have not yet achieved the faith required to start climbing upwards. All of your pleas and bargaining will fall on deaf ears until they achieve sufficient faith as to gaze upwards. Until then, you can only be a good example to them, stop others from following them and patiently wait until they change their mind. You cannot force them to change their mind and attempting to do so is a violation of the vow of non-violence.

Don’t Make the Mistake of Thinking You “Know it All”

While its good to have confidence and pride in one’s own knowledge, it is a mistake to think that you will be able to answer every question you are ever posed. While many people can master basic boolean logic, most cannot debate on meta-logic or the measurement limit. And these ideas will need to be invoked in debate much more frequently than you might initially realise. It is important to remember that never at any point in history have commoners been able to take part in debates on this subject. It has always been a tiny, insular elite who have performed debate. The greater society simply follows their edicts.

Seemingly paradoxical statements always emerge when one starts to reach the boundaries of what is able to be known. All things which are known are things which must be measured and the very fundamental rule of this Universe is that no measurement does not change the waveform it is measuring! Thus pushing the limits of knowledge of causality often precipitates seemingly contradictory statements. This is not because knowledge itself is somehow imperfect but rather: because we are.

Consider the statement: all is a quantum mechanical field. It can easily be verified that this statement is logically true. Even solid objects are not truly solid, because when you zoom in far enough, you realise that the spacing between atoms is much larger than the atoms themselves and the atoms themselves aren’t themselves solid. Moreover, every object has a natural frequency, that is: they can be made to move as waveforms, if the proper frequency is applied. So, “all is a quantum mechanical field” must be a true statement. However, in the day to day life, such a statement would seem to have very little practical applicability. Our entire external lives consist of material objects, which appear to us as having a definite shape: they don’t look like quantum mechanical phenomena. Thus the supreme truth eludes us because of how we experience the world. Practically, it is only a combination of knowledge of the fundamental quantum mechanical nature of causality AND the phenomenological world which is useful to the cult leader. Causality (that effects follow from causes) and the Measurement Limit (the fact that we exist in a Universe with 3 space-like and 1 time-like dimension) are transcendent truths and thus are go-betweens for you to use to help people reach greater awareness of the fundamental nature while still rooting your teachings in materialism (and by that I mean entities which are material, not having a collection of 475 Beanie Babies).

If this is your thing, I don’t really care, I just don’t want to know about it.

Don’t Let Defamatory Attacks Get You Down

If you are bothered by attacks on your persona, then you are not strong enough to lead a cult. If you are being attacked, you should take it as a compliment and use it to your best strategic advantage. In the minds of the vain, all insults stem from a slight to their ego. Your personal excellence has reminded someone else of their own failures and, rather than take responsibility for this, they spew bile in an attempt to bring you down to their level. Misery, as they say, loves company. Use the insult to learn what hurt you have caused them and then dump a truck’s worth of salt onto it.


All great leaders have faced tremendous opposition. Enjoy the process. And if you cannot, gracefully bow out so that someone more competent can take your place. There is no shame in serving a better leader and sometimes, that is the only choice you have.

Submission or assimilation.

we have the best memes anyway. resistance is futile.

On Fame

Fame and infamy go hand in hand when one speaks truth against an empire of lies. Thus fame and infamy will surely follow anyone who dares speak unwavering truth. You must learn to be no more attached to the love of your devotees than you are averse to the attacks of your enemies. As a human, you will always be subject to emotions, but you must learn to balance the attachment and aversion, cherish both and ultimately seek a pleasant state which encompasses both yet is separate from each.

Remember that many seek fame and most of them live to regret when and if they do achieve it. You will still have all the problems you had before you were famous, the only thing that will change is that you will have the additional awareness that tidal waves of attention won’t give you the long term happiness you seek.

timothy matlock nose job liposuction anime battle
and if you must be famous, please at least be entertaining!

Honour Your Opponents

Many would rather just pretend that their ideological opponents simply do not exist, and endeavour to censor them by any means necessary up to and including genocide. This however, is not my tradition. While I won’t rule out any means necessary to deal with those who would seek to undermine truth, I also prefer to honour those who oppose me. I do that by acknowledging their works and being willing to speak to them.

Reward Loyalty & Punish Dissent

People are hierarchical by nature. As such, they (subconsciously) seek a system which will reward their virtue and punish their wickedness. You must put as much energy into rewarding loyalty as you do stomping out dissent, and only then will you have a happy cult dictatorship where people feel comfortable expressing themselves but not so comfortable as to put others ill at ease. It is a fine line to walk, but it is a good goal to have.