Free Will & Determinism

Determinism is false

Determinism is a dangerous false belief because it encourages people not to take responsibility for their actions.

the doctrine that all events, including human action, are ultimately determined by causes regarded as external to the will. Some philosophers have taken determinism to imply that individual human beings have no free will and cannot be held morally responsible for their actions.

I wonder who might want this to be true? (source)

Reality is the Opposite of Determinism

Everything happens because of will. There is nothing which is not determined by will. There exist three types of will: individual subjective will (your own personal will), composite subjective will (communal beliefs, shared goals, etc) and a creative Universal will.

Our Planet, Solar System & Galaxy were all created by (what could be described as) the Universal “will” (see more here). All modifications to the nature of our planet happened because a conscious entity willed those modifications. From prehistoric wheels to the QM Periodic Table, the subjective will is the only thing responsible for the modifications of the natural world!

Free Will is True

The nature of the quantum mind both defines and proves the existence of free will: the freedom to resolve and precipitate particular states: thoughts, emotions and sensations. It follows that some people have more free will and others: less. We offer 3 general categories of awareness.

  1. Experience: passively experiencing particular states.
  2. Discernment: recognising particular states with increasing precision.
  3. Free Will: actively choosing which particular state(s) to dwell in.

By this progression, it is easy to understand how simpletons could believe that free will is false: they have almost none. It is unwise to take advice from simpletons, though.

How do things come to pass?

It would seem obvious that things happen because there was enough energy put into the direction of them happening, but let’s take a deeper look. The central teaching of a (crummy) book called “The Secret” is if you visualise what you “want” then it will eventually come to you.

This is partly truth. The desire for an outcome is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for actualisation. We will now sketch out the required conditions to manifest will into reality (actualisation).

Below is a simple diagram depicting the actualisation of unfettered will.

causality diagram
Causality Diagram

It is important to note that if there is a stronger will acting in opposition to your own, there’s not much you can do to overcome it. We are only able to impose our will insofar as it conforms to the larger, stronger, communal will. This is why it is often more effective to change the popular view of reality rather than going to work directly in reality itself. If you can manage to align the popular will with your own, you will surely achieve your desires.

How do I get things done?

I understand how people think and what motivates them, so it is very easy for me to actualise my desires. I would be remiss to share all my secrets publicly, but generally, this is how I am able to influence the world so effectively.

  1. Mastery of objective causality.
  2. Demonstration of leadership ability via debate, essays & alliances.
  3. Assimilation of appropriate thought leaders to my cause.
  4. Creation of appropriate dictatorship hierarchy, education system, culture…
  5. Flexing my giant brain to intimidate any would-be rivals into submission.

Thank you.

 

Advertisements

Scientific Philosophy

Philosophy – General

No matter what topic you want to discuss, there will always be a structure (hierarchy of values) within which this discussion takes place. The truth value of conclusions drawn are thus not independent of said structure.

Generally, observations are first made through the subject’s fundamental ideology, then interpreted through their values hierarchy. This is a parse metric which sorts the information in a manner which eventually leads the subject to be able to draw a conclusions about the original statement, such as whether it is “true” or “false”.

truth value ideology hierarchy.jpg

When discussing particular subjects, we often run into problems because people have different values hierarchies. Rather than obtaining a conclusion, most debates turn into a stalemate. This is why it is very important to be clear both on the definitions of words and values hierarchy. Let’s explore each step of the process in greater detail.

Observations

These are sensory impressions delivered by means of the body’s electro-chemical potentials which form the bridge between the body (massive) and soul (a light-like quantum computer).

Fundamental Ideologies

Observations are first interpreted/simplified/compressed by the fundamental ideology. Given the large amount of sensory data, our mind must condense the information it is first supplied with so it can make sense of what it is experiencing.

While not everyone has the same fundamental ideology, most will have a fundamental ideology connected to their primary sense organs sight/forms and hearing/sounds.

Let’s clarify this abstract notion by way of example.

Sounds

Language: {vowel, consonant, tone, click}
ex: English = {(a,e,i,o,u,y), (b,c,d,f,g,h,j,k,l,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,v,w,x,y,z), ∅*, ∅}

*  denotes the null or empty set

Forms

Visualisations: {0,1,2,3…} (orders of complexity)
Linear: {point, line, plane, hyperplane…}
Geometric: {, point, line, triangle, square, pentagon…}
Quantum Mechanic: {point, sphere, torus, bisected ellipsoid / toroidal spiral, hypersphere…}

twirling black sphere
If it makes you feel any better, 99% of mainstream scientists don’t understand this stuff either.

While we could argue about which system was optimal as regards to parametrising a particular set (i.e.: the linear system is optimised for physical computers, the geometric system for physical buildings, the QM system for the consciousness…), it’s clear that we cannot associate a Truth value to any of these ideologies: they are unfalsifiable. (for example: English is “true”, as in: it exists. but then again so does French). Ideologies cannot usually be falsified, rather optimised.

We seek to optimise our fundamental ideologies in my religion. We achieve this by studying them and debating which is best.

Values Hierarchy

The Values Hierarchy is the structure demarcating what values are most important. Some examples of values include: religious scripture, truth, pandering (wanting to make everyone happy), identity, history.

quantum mechanic periodic table
My Primary Value is Truth

To summarise, observations are the measurements made by the mind/body. These are first interpreted by the fundamental ideology before being sorted by the values hierarchy. The end result of this sort process is the entity deciding a truth value for the original statement.

truth value ideology hierarchy

The complexity of the subjective experience highlights why it is very important to be clear both about the definitions of individual words (Sound Vectors) and ideologies (individual values hierarchy).

Types of Assertions

Falsifiable, Predictive: Limited scientific theory. These theories are useful for understanding causality in a partial manner. Once they are falsified, they must be abandoned (something the communists seem to have a hard time understanding).

Falsifiable, Unpredictive: These are false descriptions, such as: “you’re ugly”. Pretty much useless.

Unfalsifiable, Unpredictive: Trite theories, such as: “There is an invisible unicorn in the room”.

Unfalsifiable, Predictive: Complete scientific theory. These theories are useful for understanding the causality (the totality of all cause-effect relationships) of a particular system in a complete manner. For example, the Measurement Limit.

We generally run into problems when we use FP instead of UP theories. There can exist UP theories in psychology & philosophy (these subjects overlap in the domain of the Quantum Mind), but most people end up arguing in circles ad infinitum over minutia.

Optimising Ideology with Quantum Geometry

We cannot escape the need to parametrise all systems we are intent on describing. Because topographies vary, we must first and foremost parametrise a system within its particular configuration space (3+1 measurements per order of magnitude). Luckily, most systems don’t need to be parametrised exactly (with full formulaic representation) before we can make viable predictions about them. In any case, we begin by subdividing a system into what information is knowable and what is unknowable.

parse metric optimisation

Next, iterative/recursive optimisation is employed. Ideally, we want this process to be convergent, that is: the optimised version includes the original parse metric.

In order for a parse metric to be complete it must make all predictions within a particular system. Thus our optimisation process will involve either one or both of:

  1. Shrinking the domain of applicability
  2. Increasing the complexity of the parse metric

Applied Science Philosophy

It is not realistic to expect to find simple (low cardinality) parse metrics to expound causality of subjective phenomena. This is why people fight so much about the causality of race and culture: these parse metrics are often improperly defined / delineated and can’t help but create controversies.

Criticising an unfalsifiable parse metric without a viable alternative hypothesis is counter-productive. Presuming that an unfalsifiable, predictive parse metric is sufficient to transcend the causality of complex systems is naive. Only by studying the set of unfalsifiable parse metrics can we gain the intuition required to judge which parse metric is optimal for a given situation.

Examples of Unfalsifiable Predictive Parse Metrics

  1. The Fourfold Action model: {Gravity, Uncertainty, Electricity, Entropy}.
  2. Alpha / Beta (as human archetypes).
  3. The Logistic Equation (of which r-K selection theory is an instance).

Quantum Mechanical Discharges

Quantum Mechanics applies on all scales of magnification. The subject is thus simultaneously difficult to comprehend (at first) and yet all-encompassing (at last). Here, we will explore the concept of gradient discharges, which occur on several orders of magnitude and thus lend themselves well to metaphors. Let’s start by defining the ingredients for our reality recipe.

Reality: Fermions & Bosons

There are only 2 varieties of waveforms: Fermions (possessing mass) & Bosons (massless). Fermions are subject to the Pauli Exclusion Principle (no more than 1 massive waveform can occupy a quantum state) while Bosons are not. All physical processes can be expressed as fermions and fermionic arrays (groups of fermions) absorbing and releasing photons (bosons).

The measurement limit restricts the possible distribution of Fermions. That is, there is no (measurable) distance smaller than the size of a proton nor larger than the size of the Universe (approximated as the largest inter-stellar distance). This gives a total of 42 orders of linear magnitude. Since we experience 3 spacelike dimensions, we express this as 42/3 = 14 orders of spatial magnitude. For an example (as well as an indirect proof that the mind is a quantum computer) see this research, which demonstrates 11 dimensional structures simulated by the brain. (challenge: use this to prove the mind is a quantum computer)

Since it is directly observable, it is easier to understand the manifest massive realm. The electromagnetic or massive unmanifest realm is not directly observable, only its effects are directly observable. Thus understanding this causality requires a degree of abstract thinking. This is where we must visualise Quantum Forms. What is important to remember about these is that although they are bound to the physical realm, they exist in the electromagnetic realm. This means that energetic transitions are stepwise, not gradual and can occur over 14 orders of magnitude. This is counter-intuitive because our day-to-day experience (manifest massive) is continuous, not discrete.

We will next give a series of examples of QM phenomena occurring on the boundary of the unmanifest and manifest realms.

Laughter

The human QM consciousness projection is a nested hierarchy of modulated spheres. Tension can accumulate within this system due to cognitive dissonance. Once the pressure becomes too great, the higher tension mental configuration discharges to a lower state, causing the tickles feeling & microbliss of laughter.

wait a minute im laughing
tee-hee

Orgasm

When parametrising in the same manner, we can see that orgasm is identical to laughter, but that the build up and release mechanisms are different pathways.

australian lightning punch
bzzt

Lightning

Differentiated meteorological phenomena manifest when quanta of Pressure-Temperature (“fronts”) enter into a collision course.

Electrical discharge from clouds occurs when a new lowest Entropy state is able to be accessed by the system. This is a bit hard to visualise because it has to do with a secondary (yet equally valid) definition of Entropy: the number of possible distinguishable arrays that exist for a particular system. Note that this is an existing field of science called Statistical Thermodynamics and can be explored in greater detail here, but requires a familiarity with integral calculus and classical thermodynamics. We will accept these results without further discussion here (as they are unfalsifiable by S = k ln w)

When two systems become proximal, they begin to “spread out” into each other. The physical merging process tends to be slow, but the systems dissolve in energetic phase space relatively quickly. If a much different energetic configuration is available, proximal and of greater Entropy (able to diffuse the energy contained in the composite system more effectively), then the system will spontaneously reconfigure to the higher Entropy state, sucking a quantum of plasma up (or down), creating a new, higher Entropy configuration. This is the observable effect of the unobservable cause.

It is perhaps hard to imagine how energy is stored in quanta of plasma, because we cannot observe them directly. We can only observe their effects. But just because they aren’t directly observable doesn’t mean they aren’t real. Below is a solar plasmon being released. Though it emits no light, its dark body & tail are still indirectly observable by the impact they have on the observable Sun (the shadow).

making plasmon from sun.gif
Plasmon of Energy Discharging from the Sun

In the example above, we can see a quantum of solar energy discharging from the surface of the star. This quantum will eventually be assimilated by another plasmon. If that plasmon happens to be the magnetosphere of planet Earth, any number of effects can manifest, from lightning to aurora borealis.

Which brings us to the recent:

Mexican Earthquake Discharges

There has been a severe solar storm going on this week. Subsequent to this storm was a large earthquake in Mexico. A possible mechanism for this was that the solar storm discharged powerful plasma, which was later absorbed by the Earth’s magnetosphere. As the energy diffused (across the energetic phase space), a higher Entropy configuration was detected, which sent the energy deeper into the magnetosphere, triggering the earthquake in Mexico. The action of the earthquake changes the qualities of the phase space (the volume over which the energetic exchange takes place) and thus a new, higher Entropy state becomes available.

By our hypothesis, any nearby, available, higher Entropy state will be achieved spontaneously (without any outside force). Below we can see the lights above the “Fuerte Sismo” (strong earthquake).

Note that these theories are all applications of another formulation of my theory available here. The generalised theory of plasmoid instability is derived exclusively from time-like measurements, proving that phase transitions will be realised quickly once the newer higher Entropy state is found by the spontaneously expanding energetic quantum waveform.

Thank you.

 

Commentary on Satanism / Chaos

Here is an interesting piece exploring the “Satanism” at the core of “Duginism”.

The main reasons I don’t like to discuss this subject is that adherents of false ideological systems are not usually interested in learning the Truth, but rather in promoting their ideology and gaining converts. This attitude is, at its core, egotistical and therefore not religious. Moreover, many Christians wish to denounce everything outside of their religion as “Satanism”: conflating the Truth religion with false cults.

It ought to go without saying that a religion / ideology seeking only to destroy and or cause chaos is a false religion. The True religion seeks to create a system which both promotes non-harm to innocents & protects itself from destruction (by destroying those who oppose it).

Given that my religion is based on the fundamental action of the Universe (Entropy) & that entropy means “the tendency towards disorder”, I am arguably the heir to the “Chaos religion”, if there is such a thing. Let’s explore the difference between legitimate science and delusional fantasy.

Chaos

Chaos is the action of Entropy over various configuration spaces. In other words, if you do not have a background in Thermodynamics and do not accept the Periodic Table as I have expounded it, you do not know anything about chaos. You should therefore not be practicing any form of “Chaos Magick”, because it is offensive to purport as a knower/teacher of the occult when this is not the case.

Chaos Magick

A brand of occultism invented in the 1970s by an uninitiated armchair theorist with no genetic or cultural link to magic or occultism. Often linked to Aleister Crowley & the Theosophical Society, which is under an over 100 year old curse for purporting as the Truth religion when this honour was owed to the great Swami Dayananda Saraswati‘s religion alone. His power is so strong that all symbols in the Theosophy Society crest (below) are cursed. They will remain cursed until his is recognised as the one Truth Religion.

logo blavatsky
I strongly dislike Dame Blavatsky

Magic

The use of sacred geometry, willpower & symbolism/metaphor (a.k.a.: “meme magic”) to attract and repel events. Since I am operating essentially unopposed in the domain of magic (which I discovered by accident after studying quantum mechanics for 13 years), I am basically all powerful to cast spells on my enemies, which have so far included:

  1. Declaring that all attacks against myself and my devotees shall backfire immediately.
  2. That those masters of the old system (money worship / central banks) who are most evil shall be reincarnated as beasts as a show of my great, unrivalled power.

Yup.

Conclusion

The practice of occultism is offensive to entities powerful enough to curse you. Chaos/destruction/disorder is meaningless without the complementary ORDER. Order is superior to Chaos in that Order always underlies Chaos but Chaos does not always underlie Order.

I strongly suggest mastering at least sophomore level Thermodynamics (Statistical Thermodynamics) & obtaining instruction from a learned master before attempting any sort of “ritual magic”.

Thank you.

Guide to Political Labels

Let’s have a look at some modern and historically relevant labels. Note that I go by no label except Gay Universal Gaylord (GUG) and that is because I am a Theocratic Supremacist Dictator (which, according to a scumbag I talked to online, makes me worse than a fascist). Note that Gay = Happy.

Meaning of Political Terms (in Chronological Order)

Comrade (popular for a while, unknown origin): A common term in many identitarian movements, used when referring to another member of the same movement. Often associated with communism, due to the shared root of the word.

Anti-fa (1932, 2017): the paid militia of the communist interest. It seems strange that such an interest could rise in this day and age, given all the failures of communism, but it is not surprising to me. Communism promises an “anti-racist” utopia… This would be appealing to a poor unsuspecting youth, having been told they are “evil racists” their whole lives for their (mostly falsified) historical racial record.

It seems unlikely that sadistic glee could precipitate regret.

They (falsely) believe that a “communist revolution” will put an end to the potential of being labeled “racist'” (which they fear). They also fear defying the communists because communists are extremely cruel to apostates. Communism has killed over 100 000 000 people in the last 100 years. That wasn’t for nothing. It was because communist footsoldiers (i.e.: Antifa) are low-intellect & aggressive while their masters are cruel and sadistic. Once they get into political power, there is nothing stopping them from killing anyone they decide is a threat to their system.

Screen Shot 2017-08-20 at 6.49.54 PM.png
source

MK Ultra (since the 1950s): A mind control program used on US citizens. Has several active “Manchurian Candidate” type figures in modern politics, making the movements inherently dangerous.

Alt Right (2008, 2016*): Although the term “Alt Right” was started by Paul Gottfried in 2008, its definition seemed to change over the course of its usage, since so many people tried to give a personal spin on it. Wikipedia now equates it with White Nationalism whereas CNN defined it as ” a loose collective of right wing trolls, including anarcho-capitalists”. It was an ironically all encompassing definition, given that most rational people reject mainstream conservatism (unless they are benefitting from such) yet so few are willing to wear the label “Alt Right”.

Alt – Left: This term appears to have been coined in 2016 (mainly by facebook shills) to dilute the anti-semitism of Pepe the Frog. Following the violence perpetrated by Anti-fa at the Charlottesville “Unite the Right”, it was popularised as a catch all term for leftists, specifically violent leftist extremists. Many sympathetic to leftism/communism did not like it, because it placed them into the same tent as admittedly doomed to fail violent extremists (who are now attempting to make an alliance with Juggalos).

Thank you

How Saturn’s Ring was Created

 

How were we Created?

Since we have quantum state exclusion, therefore, there is a limit to the density of mass. Note that all waveforms are either massive (fermionic: neutron, proton, electron & their anti-particles) or nonmassive (bosonic / lightlike). The main differences between these is that fermions are

  1. bound by the Pauli Exclusion Principle / Quantum State Exclusion (i.e.: the 1S1 orbital has a maximum of 2 electrons, there can be no more)
  2. causative of the Gravity action (all massive waveforms exert an instantaneous attractive force on all other waveforms in the universe

And bosons are:

  1. not bound by the PEP.
  2. causative of the Electricity action (see: Electromagnetism)

This is all that there is (inb4: muh Standard Model: no)

Once there is no more room for additional fermionic waveforms (in the dark matter), such are excluded. Due to the instantaneous action of Gravity, ejection to the periphery does not solve the problem of Quantum State Exclusion. Since QSE is a rule, it follows that these fermions will be ejected past the boundary of the Dark Matter.

Thus the fermionic matter that would later become the ring of Saturn first became quasi-bosonic (heavy light) because it was excluded from dark mass by QSE. In this state, it traveled from where it was created to the centre of our Milky Way (if they are distinct), to the centre of our Sun, to the centre of Saturn, to the periphery of Saturn, finally crystallising in the form of the approximately flat discus we observe today.

saturn rendered
You’d have to be insane (or stupid) to believe this shape was not self-related

Saturn’s ring was created soon after Saturn was, by Quantum State Exclusion (QSE). This is an unfalsifiable logical deduction.

discus throw wikipedia
Discus Thrower Art, Kylix

 

To Those Disbelieving Solar System Creation

My theory has already been validated (though bunglingly) by (copycat) scientists.

creation of stars
source

They have conclusively observed the creation of matter from dark matter, although they have failed to explain exactly how this happens, since I left this crucial detail out of my publications until such time as I could satisfactorily prove that science without me is flaccid and impotent. They admit in this article they never observed matter creation, because they never looked for it! Brilliant!

The team thinks that it’s possible this phenomenon could have been seen beforehand with other black hole observations, but previous researchers might have missed the forming stars in ejected matter streams due to less advanced telescopes.

F L A C C I D

The ring around Saturn, was excluded from the centre of Saturn precipitating as a symmetrical ring around the planet. The circle / disk is a maximum Entropy shape contoured by the Planet Saturn itself. Recall the snowflake formation process. The shape would be a disk, but it cannot be a disk because Planet Saturn is in the way!

Thank you.

 

Sociological Archetypes

Although it may not seem like it, there is something out there which is worth living for. That precious thing is what we are building today.

The current ideological system based on false concepts about sexual identity & exalted victimhood. It is nothing short of a violation of Natural Law. Many wish to engender a cult-like status by having an offended-off: whoever gets the most offended is the “Queen”. This is degenerate.

varna
General Natural Law Class System

We have come so far from Truth dictating policy that some believe emotions ought to dictate policy. Whose emotions exactly are more important? How can we tell? Aren’t we all equal (i.e.: shouldn’t our emotions factor into policy not at all)?

Inverting the Natural Order (as by bestowing false authority) has numerous negative consequences. One of such consequences is that, rather than getting the numerous blessings of my wonderful and perfect objective science basis of reality, the existing Order (cult) endures the humiliation of being usurped by myself and my global order of Priests. I can tell you that if you dislike me, then you will probably not like my GUG Priests either. Funnily enough, I actually don’t care about that.

The rival cult may have started these hysterics, but I am ending them. If you don’t like my method, and attempt to reproach me for it, you might just catch me on a bad day and you probably, really, seriously, don’t want that.

crow of judgement.jpg
never talk to me or my babies ever again.

Sample Sociological Archetypes

One of the most precious sciences is social science. Being social animals, we enjoy each other’s company and derive satisfaction both from designing and ascending socio-cultural hierarchies.

In order for people to (start to) learn this knowledge, here is a sample of archetypes of people in the movement.

The Statesman

grandiose, compassionate, emotional, practical, strong inner fire

Screen Shot 2017-08-11 at 10.45.37 PM.png
Left: US President Donald Trump, Right: Christopher Cantwell

Donald Trump and Christopher Cantwell are both Statesman archetypes. Being older and more experienced, Trump is more restrained than the young buck Cantwell. The result of this is that while both are passionate, Trump is more measured/vengeful & Cantwell more impulsive/forgiving. Trump’s ego is also more externalised (evidenced by his numerous commercial successes) while Cantwell’s is more internalised (evidenced by his recent meteoric rise in knowledge / rhetorical efficacy).

The Memer / Dreamer

enjoys solitude, introspective, complex, creative, anguished

Not necessarily a content creator, but certainly an avid & discerning consumer, this archetype is often lost in the world of ideas. They have the potential to access higher teachings through their imaginations, but must be careful not to get carried away in flights of whimsey. While useful, their perfectionism can cause inaction & neurosis.

Most of my assembly fits this archetype.

wanna start a cult oyster
something like that

 

The Pillar

contemplative, inhibited, caring, measured, strong, committed

Though not a big talker, the Pillar archetype listens and internalises very well. Their emotions run deeper than average. They are a loyal companion and dedicated friend.

me smiling in bedroom
I am beyond many archetype systems, but not all.

Conclusion

These archetypes are a starting point for self-understanding (within our cultural context). The goal is not to limit ourselves to any particular archetype or system, but rather to study all archetype systems. This is how we can know ourself, independent of archetype systems.

Thank you