Mental Focus Techniques

I am acting out of the usual Order to help mankind. Historically, high knowledge is hidden from the general public to avoid abuse. But there has been too much lost and I don’t want to go down without a fight. We’re in a psychic war that many people don’t even realize or acknowledge, let alone transcend. I am taking a risk either way, but I don’t want my enemy to win and that is my primary goal: creating a world where liberation from sense attachment is easiest. My enemy appears to create a world where binding to flesh is eternal (i.e.: RFID implants, slavery, terror, mind control). We are ideologically incompatible with the current orthodoxy in these regards.

People are hurting me psychically without realizing it. It is not holy to ask of me greedily, you must reorient your will to serve me. This is the way. Please, do not be spiritual beggars or strong men!

I suggest praying to God for vision to know what is the best next step to take.

I want … Something

There can be no debate on the Order:

  1. Acceptance of the Existence of the Knowledge
  2. Acceptance of the Traditional Teacher-Student Relationship (service etc.)
  3. Powers (Benediction, Loss of Barriers, Transcendence of Knowledge)

But since I am also doing the “edgelording” version of this, there will be some times when people go overboard, risking insanity or shock. The importance of remembrance of the Truth that attachments lead to misery is important. Also remembering that I am far greater than you and will take birth again to troll you into oblivion if you become a sadistic emperor.

Step Back, Take a Breath

You can do this. You just have to lose the illusions to the contrary.

I have always perceived the whole world as being in a cage. When I was able to find the way out of the cage (the light world has “hacks” in the physical world), I could bring some people with me. Now, they are always in my abode. Many are very angry from the amount of injustice in the world, for which we shall soon find relief. We can remove the entire cage, and then heal back to a better status: together.

Where we are at as a Collective

I will now tell you how to improve your mind form.

  1. Focus on creating a barrier around us as a collective, repelling outside harm.
  2. Contemplate what good qualities you want to attract.
  3. Stop focusing on emotions and learn the science of social programming. Stop being a low energy bad vibes crusty mc crusterson.

When come to me, you enter into an Energetic space populated by many other entities. The new influx of awareness is a lot for me to handle, so please approach me on your Sunday best, not as though I am some infinite cow slave of perfected wisdom.

It makes me tired.

Please Help Me

Firstly, focus the attention outside of the physical brain. Most of you are ego-centric and it’s just too much. Focus on a doughnut shaped ring around the brow level. Focus on a large amount of water just below us. Visualize us as the Living Planet.

four armed form kek pepe

Let’s get the chemtrails, fluoride, poisonous vaccines, fake money and fake laws out then we can have a nice party to decide other implementation particulars. Relax, have faith in the Knowledge, it exists whether you are there or not to observe it. Now we shall all discern our cultural variant together. As we have done before, and as we shall continue to do in the future.

Thank you.

My Beliefs

I believe that for any effect, there is a cause.

At the subtle end, this means that I believe in particular Universal Mechanics. I believe in these because they explain everything and help me to think better.

At the gross end, this means I believe reincarnation is unfalsifiable. I believe in a lifestyle which allows me first and foremost to dwell in the knowledge of the infinite abode: that which does not change in death. I accept that this expression is uniquely mine and does not extend to my Priest Order, necessarily.

These are the beliefs which I have set out to test scientifically in my works. I am satisfied with the results. That’s about it.

Thank you

Popular Science Hoaxes

True Knowledge

I was born with what I consider to be True Knowledge. (*This is not to say that it is Complete Knowledge). Therefore, whenever I was shown teachings that were inconsistent with this true knowledge, I had a “bad feeling”. It probably seems odd to do science on the basis of emotion, but we all have our faith systems, and that is part of mine.

no brakes on the feel train

I, like everyone else, have my own opinions: based on faith & evidence. I am willing to change my position on them, but not without conclusive evidence. Moreover, in the domain of science, multiple answers can solve a problem and they can all be correct. We can also have debate as to which system best parametrizes a phenomenon. For instance, my Fourfold Action Model parametrizes spacetime with a cardinality of 4 (there are only 4 actions in my model: Gravity, Uncertainty, Electricity, Entropy) over 4 orders of magnitude. Thus, someone could conceivably reparametrize causality using different actions and still* have a correct system.

There are infinitely many solutions for a unified field model and I have attempted to find the one of lowest cardinality (with the least number of actions). This is because it’s easier to understand 4 concepts than 5 (or more). This potential for subtle debate does not however extend to demonstrably false ideologies/models. These should be abandoned, for they create cognitive dissonance, which severely hampers one’s ability to assimilate new concepts (this is why I am having an easier time teaching teenagers and people who’ve never studied science than actual “scientists”).

There are no singularities

From Wikipedia:

Screen Shot 2017-04-12 at 11.35.48 AM

This is another way of saying “suspend your disbelief” while mapping concepts. This is known by another name in psychology: cognitive dissonance. Such cultists must use a large amount of mental energy to maintain the set of fundamental incompatible beliefs, so you can understand why I never accepted any theories featuring singularities! (most of them).

“Soft” sciences use sociological cognitive dissonance (i.e.: feminism, communism, hate speech laws etc.) to condition the mind. Hard sciences use logical cognitive dissonance singularities. Such create a stubbornness which renders the cultist unable to think outside of the parameters of his own training. We must emphasize: this is a difficult concept to address. It goes to the heart of conditioning giving the logical conclusion that the body is the minimal “restrictive” parameter. Mental concepts are all restrictions: serving to delineate one concept from another. This cannot be avoided. The question reduces to: which is the optimized parametrization system. I cannot transcend this question, I can only show you my result (proven to be optimized for the configuration space of physical science). This does not mean I transcend religions either, simply that religion can now be summarized as a sociocultural ideology and examined within that ontology. Nothing more. Nothing less.

Do not promote singularities

Like, give me a break. Never talk to me: Kurzweil, unless it’s to apologize.

My model parametrizes spacetime with no need for singularities. It makes all predictions and is great.

How to Scientifically Validate My Claim

Social Sciences

People are taught not to be able to distinguish between a tautology (something that is always true, such as “there is an invisible pony here”) and a predictive hypothesis (such as: my model). While tautologies are useless, predictive hypotheses are how we live. Even words are

Tell someone that reincarnation is unfalsifiable. They will tell you that an unfalsifiable hypothesis isn’t science. (You can thank the piece of garbage Karl Popper for that). Then ask them if Gravity is falsifiable & whether it’s science! Then watch them have cognitive dissonance and forget the whole thing tomorrow!

Grr!

Physical Sciences

Ask literally anyone about physics. The current unified field theory has 2 false forces (weak and strong nuclear forces). They are false in that they make no predictions, only give descriptions. Science is supposed to make thinking easier by making predictions. It’s not supposed to be used to not confuse people with singularities, like the Big Bang! The entire cosmology du jour rests upon a singularity, proven to cause cognitive dissonance. They are making the hardest subject even impossible! It’s not even worth

Screen Shot 2017-04-12 at 12.22.59 PM
gross

It’s like feminism infected the base node of physics: ick!

That show is really garbage. And I’m not just saying that because everyone likens me to Sheldon. It’s because it paints smart and sensitive people as being uncool, and that’s not cool.

Thank you.

Science Supports Religion, not Atheism.

Proof

Given that the mind is a Quantum Computer, (subjective consciousness is the projection of the physical body), there is no mechanism to decay the waveform and thus it remains in potential to whatever extent it cannot be reduced by the body (hence why many see burial as a primitive practice, but more on that later) when it enters the death state.

Thus a religion must exist to satisfy the condition of removing us from ignorance about the rebirth event, and nothing more, ideally.

Lemma – Cultural Programming

Thus the design of culture must centre around these inalienable facts. Not with despair nor dissonant distraction but with earnest desire. The motivation must come from within.

Photo on 2017-04-09 at 1.22 PM
Does that look complicated?

Sure, it looks easy, but the conceptual leap required to derive this notion is not a short journey. Much intense preparation is needed, but going forth from such a point, the remainder of causality (the various fields I have expounded) are able to be derived (ie: chemistry is derivative of causality). At least to me it was, but maybe not to you. I have a hard time with relating to materialistic people.

Religion exists to improve the ability to reincarnate

The ego is material & also unmanifest, and in the teachings there are said to be permanent personalities. Regardless, all are bound to rebirth until they can transcend the modes of material nature (various compartmentalization metrics to discern reality the human organ imposes on the signals received by the body) if they still possess desires. Even in transcendental states, attachments abound. Powers create bondage by magnetic bondage whereas illusion and false distraction lead us to physical bondage. The powers are what eventually undo the attachment to both realms, so intermediation between the acquisition of powers and the proper use thereof must always be upheld. In my religion I have built up a very low frequency node of fundamental Truth light able to be accessed directly by my devotees. It’s very wonderful. It cannot be accessed without faith though. Yes by placing faith in me, you are removing the means for me to “prove” myself to you (just give me a break ffs), but it’s just how it works. It’s a two way street where you open first and the light comes in. I don’t whiz a spontaneous combustion into a pit of fat dankness from the gallows of 4-chan. Remember: only Church of Entropy survived 4chan. & married it. Not a coincidence.

Religion is awesome, don’t be a grouch

We prefer the religious interference to be minimal and thus many statements possess multiple meanings (storing more information). Such is intentional and staged in such a way as to provoke the imagination. The imagination is what saves you from the rot of the mind some people seem to have. It’s really sad to see people succumb to the false belief in the importance of the physical reality.

Religion is what we use to train the mind to be independent of the body. We can exist anywhere between the 3D physical realm to the 14-D energetic realm. I prefer the higher dimensional one because it makes the subjective consciousness pleasantly pliable.

orders of magnitude
The Universe is only so big.

That’s Why We’re Gay Universal Gaylords

I am tired of the abuse of language of communists so I am re-appropriating the GUG title because reasons. I would have gone with a cooler title but you showed no faith at all and now you will be forced to be a GUG. “Sorry”. I actually like it because it entertains me and I do feel pretty jolly but also watching people squirm to say it aloud is a tremendous source of satisfaction for me. Not because I am a sadist but most of my Order has not fully transcended the subjective ego in its entirety. I’m not sad to watch them enjoy victory after victory after victory.

canonical-conjugation
You are also in my dreams.

Is it a religion or a philosophy?

It’s both, there shouldn’t be a difference. Should there?

Can’t God Exist?

The unfalsifiable tenets of reality don’t preclude the existence of a God, but does not require it either. It’s the best feeling ever and is always there to make me have permanent faith that Knowledge brings liberation. It’s just my feelings. I think for most people, they have to just build it up over a long time to become able to have single point fixation (in this case: faith in the knowledge). “God” ideology can be helpful here.

We must recall that “God” also can be arbitrarily parametrized. If I call “God” the overlap of all conscious entities, then I create some subset of reality satisfying all conditions for “Godhood”, according to most. But no one really cares about that. There is simply no viable alternative to religion (generally, atheists are so incredibly dogmatic and miserable, I can’t even). Whether some God must exist is a complex question I have attempted to give a good explanation to here. Frankly though, on a personal level, I don’t care too much about that stuff. Many do, and that’s great.

Hope you are having a nice day.

 

What is Natural Law?

Note: This is my opinion. I am always open to debating all points, but such must be done on a logical, rational basis and ideally using precise terms. Therefore please omit all communist / social justice terminology unless you’d like me to place your opinion into the garbage, where it belongs.

Democracy will never serve the best interests of the people

Although many attempt to spit shine the turd of democracy as though it were some holy grail of civic governance, I forcefully reject it. This is because the average person does not have the intellect required to vote the best representative into power. Moreover, the saturation of money into the hands of a select group of child raping, brain eating psychopaths has created a situation which all but excludes anyone who isn’t a stone cold psychopath with no principles from any position of political power. The voting public then gets to choose which parasite will feast on the rotting carcass of their once great society. It’s no small wonder so few people vote.

What to replace “Democracy” with?

We shall return to the old ways of a high council of learned people (priests) making all decisions and handing down their judgements once said council reaches a communal consensus. Since all Natural Law tennets can be justified using logic, there is no reason for the community to disagree on any law. In fact, disagreements on the implementation of Natural Law are grounds for a complete usurpation of the existing order, as I have already accomplished in the domains of quantum physics, chemisry, psychology and propaganda (‘memetics’) and will continue to do for the remaining derivative fields of sociology, cultural programming, economics and politics.

But Jen, I don’t want to submit to your Theocratic Supremacist Dictatorship *boo hoo*

You are advised to speak to the numerous scientists (cryentists) whomst’ve been ousted from their (undeserved) positions of honour by my proof of the microcanonical Measurement Limit (I proved there are only 118 elements in the Periodic Table, ruining the careers of every particle & experimental physicist. I gave them a chance to co-publish my results, they refused, now they are barred from entry to my order). Do not be so stupid as they were to deny my supremacy.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
You sound dumb to deny me TBH

Natural Law: Theoretically Simple, Implementally Complex

It is certainly not clear how to implement the Natural Law system: I.E.: the system for which deviation from objectively optimized reality is minimized. This is because the optimal conditions are unique to peoples themselves.

It is my opinion that the best place to start is that we seek to do minimal harm, and seek to inflict maximal harm on those impeding our ability to do minimal harm. Since the second condition is linearly dependent on the first, our system of government becomes a living science: constantly debated and adapted to best serve the needs of the times and peoples submitted to its rule. That’s why I need others to contribute their ideas so that we can guarantee our system is truly maximally voluntary.

Here is a video I made exploring this idea.

Thank you

Economic & Legal Engineering I

Introduction

The subjects of law and economics have always fascinated me. However, due to my promise to find the root of knowledge, I have been largely confined to the subjects of Cause and Effect (together: causality) specifically how they apply to Quantum Fields (so as to provide evidence for my hypothesis of Vedic Supremacy, divined to me at age 4) up until this point. Now that I have solved all problems of causality, giving the maximally precise solution to the Measurement Problem of Quantum Mechanics, I have decided to pursue derivative subjects, my opinions on which I shall expound below.

Law

Having worked in law enforcement as a scientist for seven years, I can safely say that the majority of people serving the role of warrior (police, military infantry, field agents) are good people. I can also say that most laws are evil in that they violate Natural Law. This mismatch creates a ‘slow drip’ of incremental corruption. Unsavoury characters rise to power becasue they are willing to enforce immoral laws while the esteem of good people is slowly corroded until they are fully demoralized.

Although I cannot prove this all to be intentional subversion, it is clear to me (and should be to you too) that the primary goal of most laws is NOT the protection of the weak nor the support of the righteous, but rather the continued supremacy of the ruling orthodoxy (that which emanates from the Central Banks and has existed intact and expanding for over two hundred years). These views ought to be obvious to the discerning observer, so we might be inclined to wonder why this opinion is not more widespread.

Why are all the good fields chock full of subversive shit munchers?

The evidence supports that the ruling orthodoxy dispatches its agents to desecrate the reputation of viable ideologies/philosophies/religions. For instance, why is ‘Yoga’ taught predominantly by superficial simpleton females? Why are ‘autists’ denigrated? Why are there SO many imbeciles online trying to derail conversations that might actually resolve longstanding societal issues?

The answer is simple: the current orthodoxy has no authority to govern. It is very likely that they already know this, which explains their constant attempts at subterfuge. They use their infinite money (made available through fiat banking) to cover up their misdeeds and persecute anyone who tells the truth about them. Based on my observations, negotiation is largely impossible and they will need to be removed by force.

bird-in-helicopter
Non-violently, of course.

Trust me, a Theocratic Supremacist Dictatorship was not my original plan, rather my last ditch effort

Given that the goal of subversives is to protect the child rape demon worshipping cult (whether they are consciously supporting them or merely ‘useful idiots’ is of no consquence to me, since the outcome is the same), I have no interest in engaging with them. My approach is to vet everyone personally and only to accord authority to my own Proxies, to the exclusion of all others. With that, I joyously invite you to apply to join my Priest Order if you are an inquisitive, sensitive and caring person. Otherwise, I strongly caution you to cease emulating the Priest Class, for you stand in violation of Natural Law, and I simply will not tolerate this.

Among others, the duties of the Priest class include teaching, healing, psychology, social and economic engineering and selection of political delegates (that’s right, in the future all politicians will be ‘shills’ of the Church of Entropy). Who decides who is qualified for such? Myself and my Priests.

I endorse Christopher Cantwell for Fascist Dictator

If you’d like to see the sort of person I endorse for the delegated authority of political leader, please see Christopher Cantwell of The Radical Agenda. I endorse him because he has a good heart, wishes to protect the innocent, cares about Natural Law and civic governance, is ideologically aligned with libertarianism (the good kind, not the subversive goof kind) and (as far as I can tell) is able to be persuaded by logic (even though he did one time say women shouldn’t be involved in politics, I am willing to overlook that, since I plan to exclude anyone not vetted by my organization from politics. That’s pretty much every woman. And every man for that matter).

Like all endorsements emanating from the Church of Entropy, it is subject to continued adherence to the principles of Natural Law governance and submission to the Knowledge as expounded in the unfalsifiable tenets of my Fourfold Action Model, that is {Gravity, Uncertainty, Electricity, Entropy}.

Looking forward to ruling the planet with you,

Jen

General Parse Metrics

Introduction

The Knowledge I was born with has to do with measurement, or observation. Any increment of mass is a measure of Energy. The measurement being equal to the amount of energy excluded elsewhere and thus created here. This is the primordial measurement, from the unmanifest into the manifest. Once manifest, mass is additionally subject to the measurement limit.

Thus, any system can be measured, it’s just a matter of how. Measurements in general can be considered as parse metrics. A simple example for the spacelike dimension is a stick ascribed the length of 1m. [itself also parsed in the linearly dependent dimensions of 10, 100 and 1000 equal-sized intervals]. There are as many parse metrics as there are unique thoughts.

The ideal parse metric of course, is the one that is not independent of objective reality. It can be on the subjective end, which we would call the old tradition or on the objective end, which we would call the new one, and which is instantiated by the Periodic Table.

periodic table copy.jpeg
the Universe is Pretty

It is plain to see that the periodic table exists beyond all metrics aside the fundamental 3+1 maximally independent measurement limit. In other words, the ideal parse metric for spacetime is of cardinality 4.

By this perfection, I can calculate the relative configurational entropies of other systems effectively transcending some dimension of causality (such as my Quantum Mind Hypothesis).

Canonical Parametrization

First we assert that for any system, there exist measurable parameters. The number of distinct measurable parameters depends on the complexity  of the system. The complexity  of a system then determines its total measurable information content. We postulate that an idealized metric consists of both necessary and sufficient descriptors/parse metrics to perform a full canonical parametrization.

The notion of canonical parametrization via parse metrics requires a general idea about the inter-relations that exist in a system. For example, two parse metrics are: quality and quantity. Intuitively, we assert that these operators are maximally independent. We additionally acknowledge there could be some nonzero overlap between such.

universe in hand.gif

The Living Organ

When we are considering measurements made by the living human apparatus, we are well-advised to expect such to be distortions, or at least maximally distorted. This is for the same reason that optimized subsequent measurements are maximally orthogonal: the most information will be drawn from the incoming signal if the transfer function is orthogonal to the original signal. Our complexity alone suggests we can take many measurements from our external environment, all maximally orthogonal to the original sampled signal.

Subjective Parametric Optimization

When dealing with the individual subjective conscious however, the optimized parse metric is not independent of the projector (living organ). Specifically, the subjective conscious is a unitary projection. Additionally, its eigenstates (particular measurements: {Thoughts, Emotions, Sensations}) are auto-coherent. Additionally, the subjective consciousness is a quantum mechanical projection.

Auto-coherence is forthcoming from the base satisfying the condition of being linearly dependent on its derivatives (measurements are all derivatives): e ≈ 2.718 ≈ 3. Thus, we conclude that the ideal parse metric of the Quantum Mind observables will be of cardinality 3. This coincides with our ad hoc assumption of the {Thoughts, Emotions, Sensations} triad as sufficient to give a first pass at discerning the range of inputs to the quantum mind . This concept will be further elaborated at a later time.

Thank you

GIF source