Popular Myths Debunked

Reincarnation isn’t real if I don’t believe in it

Nature is manifold cyclic. Every entity undergoes rebirth. Your desire to not be reborn is insufficient to prevent you being reborn and no amount of wishful thinking, praying, fanaticism, denial is going to change that fact. You’re stuck here to face the consequences of all your actions until you reach liberation (not too likely at this point, especially if we lose the info-war).

reincarnation pepe
Don’t wait until you die to accept the Truth

The Central Banks will always be there

In the 400 years or so that these institutions have existed, we have seen countless wars, deaths, famine and genocide. There is no reason to continue on with these institutions and we’ll be removing them as quickly as humanly possible. Given that humans have been bartering using money for a very long time, we don’t see that institution going away anytime soon, but we can easily do away with fiat/usury based money.

fractal wrongness.png
saying something is true doesn’t make it true

Marijuana/Hemp ought to be Illegal

It’s not realistic to make a plant illegal. Historically it has been used as medicine and has already been shown to help with several conditions. The only reason it is illegal now is so that the pharmaceutical industry can operate without competition. There is no reason for this plant to be illegal. Anyone telling you otherwise is either ignorant or benefitting from the illegitimate health care psychotropic industry.

It’s a fucking plant dipshit. What are you going to make illegal next? Oxygen? Carbon dioxide?

Traveling to and colonising other planets is likely

It really isn’t. I don’t even think the Moon landing was real at this point. Anyone dreaming about colonising other planets would do well to focus on improving circumstances here on Earth through wisdom and introspection, not lying to cover up a legacy of failed conquests and violence against native people.

Worry about Planet Earth first, morons.

Thank you

Creation Hypothesis Validated

Hardly anyone can understand my science theory. That’s part of the reason why I haven’t talked too much about the primary Creation Hypothesis. People have a hard enough time visualising the secondary Creation Hypothesis (3+1 spacetime measurement limit per order of magnitude, the microcanonical limit of which is the Periodic Table).

Here we can see the confession that:

“supermassive black holes are capable of creating – not just destroying – cosmic bodies.”

Which means my Creation Hypothesis has been validated & the Big Bang Singularity is thereby invalidated!

“If star formation is really occurring in most galactic outflows,” says Maiolino, “then this would provide a completely new scenario for our understanding of galaxy evolution.”

This is actually a good thing

No one understands modern day Cosmology because it’s not really scientific (incomprehensible). A scientific theory ought to make predictions, not be based around a fundamental falsehood!

eating einstein.jpg
You’re done. Actually, you’re overdone!

What is true then?

My theory is “true” in that it cannot be proven false (whether it is objectively True (in that no more accurate system exists to describe the objectively observable Universe) is another matter). At present, my theory is the simplest theory which is also complete: 4 actions over 4 orders of magnitude. There is thus no reason to not use my theory instead.

How are Stars Formed?

The current universe model claims that a singularity created the observable universe and that matter has been “accreting” (coalescing) ever since this initial expansion phase. They claim that this all started with a Big Bang “singularity“, defined as: “in general a point at which a given mathematical object is not defined”. In other words, a state where the laws of math and physics break down. Except that there is no such state (because there doesn’t need to be).

Since there is direct proof that (stellar) matter can be CREATED, there is no reason to hold on to the “Big Bang” theory (or any other singularity for that matter).

Also I know what the right theory to predict this result is, but I’m not telling you.

Not until I get satisfaction.

turtle flat earth.jpg
Flat Earth is a Paid Disinformation Campaign

Thank you

Refuting Science Hoaxes


My system is a transcendent fourfold action model. This means that everything that happens can be explained by one or more actions, specifically: Gravity (mass attracts mass & energy alike), Uncertainty (the product of the uncertainty of system observables is bounded by a constant, called the Plank Constant), Electricity (movement of electrons and resulting electromagnetic fields) & Entropy (the spontaneous increase of disorder). It is simple on the surface, but it takes some time to be able to understand it inside and out (mainly because Uncertainty is difficult to visualise).

Many commonly held beliefs in science are false. Here we will explore how to refute such hoaxes. My system makes it much easier to refute falsity, because it is true.

The Big Bang

This is the belief in a singular origin of Universal matter. This can be refuted in a number of ways:

  1. Background radiation is isotropic, meaning it comes from all directions, if the Big Bang had happened, it would have an origin point, and there would be a direction between us and it. Thus the background radiation would have a direction, which is does not.
  2. If everything had a singular origin, it would all be the same age, which we do not observe (some parts of the Universe are much older than ours, some, much younger).
  3. Big Bang claims that we are “made of stardust”, which would require our planets to have coalesced from smaller bodies (precipitated from plasma created in the Big Bang). However, all planets in our Solar System have the same age (to within a modest error margin). This supports the position that our Solar System was created near-simultaneously, not accreted over millennia.

Comment: It is somewhat confusing that The Universe does not have a unique origin point, but that our Solar System does. In order to understand, we must first clear our minds as the Big Bang mythos is entirely false. Simulating the Big Bang using the Quantum Mind requires cognitive dissonance. This is an electromagnetic “knot”, and requires comparatively more effort to simulate. Take your time.

The Standard Model

If we accept the ad hoc assumption that entities behave either in a wave-like OR particle-like manner, then the standard model is 100% false. It posits that the Universe is made up of particles, that everything can be broken down into individual “particles”. The truth is that all spacetime entities are fundamentally wavelike, particle-like behaviour is an illusion. It can be falsified with the following talking points:

  1. Matter waves are validated, the particle hypothesis is not.
  2. All actions are explained with 3 massive entities (electron, proton, neutron), why do you need a bunch more when they don’t make additional predictions?
  3. Did you know that both Einstein and Feynmann were proven frauds?


On the surface, Evolution appears to be unfalsifiable. It claims that traits are “selected” for (and against) and over longer periods of time, traits best suited to environment will become more widespread. It’s not that this mechanism isn’t true, it’s just not the main mechanism of organismal change. The DNA matrix is far more malleable than we realise (I am not going to share this knowledge until my Theocratic Dictatorship is instituted. because reasons). Therefore “evolution” is marred with erroneous causality: where cause and effect are switched.

  1. The Earth/Moon/Sun system is bounded (since the Earth’s oceans bind the Solar photons to the surface of the planet) and thus the ability of this system to increase the Entropy (in other words: digest the solar photons) always improves. This tendency motivates more change than natural selection.
  2. The DNA matrix holds the computational complexity to change in the face of changing environmental conditions (rather than environmental conditions changing the DNA, as taught by evolution).

Both mechanisms far outweigh the mechanism of Evolution (or natural selection).

Is anything not a hoax?

A few things aren’t a hoax. I’ve worked my whole life to formalise what isn’t a hoax, and that’s my fourfold action model. Let’s have a look at what that entails.

  1. All actions can be explained with the fourfold set: {Gravity, Uncertainty, Electricity, Entropy}.
  2. The speed of light appears to be bounded by a constant. The consequences of this are time dilation and length contraction (Special Relativity) (not required theoretical knowledge, but still nice to know).
  3. Everything is a spacetime event. Yes, even you. You are a spacetime event. The Periodic Table is the smallest possible spacetime event. You, as an entity, are also a spacetime event. A spacetime event contains space-like and time-like measurements bounded by the Measurement Limit, that is, 3+1 maximally independent measurements per order of magnitude.
we're all spacetime events
Bust of Ganesha, The Periodic Table (circle diagram) & the Vitruvian Man

Do not feel as though you have to transcend my system in order to defend it. It is already validated by several domains and has no counter-evidence. It is highly unlikely that any counter-evidence will be found in the current lifetime because there is a good chance my system is objectively correct. In the event that counter-evidence is supplied, I will accept it and update my theory, because that is what scientists do.

thank you


Achieving Priest Status

Authority is based on continued adherence to our principles and can be revoked at any time.

If you are part of a personality sub-cult, and the leader has their authority revoked, then yours is as well. Thus we suggest that you also prove your worth to the main branch of the cult.

First Order – Propagandist

Trolls, memers, outspoken critics of the reigning orthodoxy are all welcome. Remember that your opinions are subject to public debate.

Second Order – Magician

Demonstrated working knowledge of the (unmanifest – manifest electromagnetic) Creation Event. To be accepted as an apprentice, you must derive the shape of a snowflake using the Creation Pulveriser expounded here.

Third Order – Psychologist

Demonstrated transcendence of the Quantum Mind.

Fourth Order – Economist

Derive the optimised economic system.

Fifth Order – Social Programmer

Mastery of Orders 1-4.

Sixth Order – Primary Permutation

Derive the chemical activity matrix, the local event (Earth, Moon, Sun).

Seventh Order – Primary Creation

Derive the Creation, nuclear reactivity & chemical activity matrices, the local event (Earth, Moon, Sun).

The “Devil’s Frequency” (proof)

Here, we will show how 440 Hz music is used to do mind control

We recall that the harmonics of the Periodic Table are Complete. That is: the information in the Periodic Table is sufficient to describe the entire Universe (namely the 3+1 dimensional measurement limit & associated permutations). That is, the number of unique quantum states (elements) per striation (in that each new Period represents an additional spacetime “measurement”) equals: {2, 8, 18, 32} or {2(1), 2(4), 2(9), 2(16)} = 2{12,22,32,42}, linearly equivalent to the cardinality of the Universal Measurement Limit.

*see more here

We will now explain why 440 as a pitch standard is used for quantum mind control.

1. 432 Hz is an Optimal Musical Tuning Frequency

Any base frequency made from the {2,3,4} triad is considered a “Natural Frequency”.

432 is one such frequency, by:

432 = (2433) = (2432)3 = (4232)3

2. QM Consciousness is a Combination of Frequencies

By the QM nature of the mind,

  • and the fact that Natural Frequencies require the least energy to project and thus represent maximal Entropy states (in the consciousness)
  • and the fact that the greatest Entropy state is always approached (generally)

Thus living organisms will tend to emit natural frequencies and so the mind is a linear combination of frequencies (generated by electricity / magnetism of the body). Thus 432 Hz is one of the projected frequencies.

2. Beats Phenomenon

Beats are created when two similar frequencies exist in the same phase space. The result is a beat with a frequency equal to the difference in frequency between the two emitters.

The prime factorization of 440 = (11*4*5*2) is not a product of base set triad frequencies. The difference between 440 & 432 (= 8Hz) is small enough to create beats in the range of words (

Since the difference in frequencies between This has the effect of weakening the Quantum Mind. It sounds really nice (like the 432 Hz would) but is simply an impostor beating you down gradually. Kind of like Chinese water torture or fiat banking.

I hope when we have peace that I can make some new instruments consistent with the base frequencies of the Universe.

Thank you

Please see an additional exploration here.

See more: https://youtu.be/1KBof8Gm2TI


Transcending Emotions


The individual subjective soul is a linear combination of multi-ordered impressions. Most impressions are NOT infinite. However, they can certainly feel that way. It does not do much from a practical perspective to know that impressions are temporary, unless that awareness is permanent.

In the discipline, we employ temporary measures in order to come to permanent realizations. Once a permanent realization is reached, it’s like a light switching on: a quantum mechanical transition (and not easy to reverse!). One such temporary measure is to determine the precise location of manifestation of emotions in the body (tension).

My system assigns thoughts as maximally correlated to the brain organ and emotions as maximally correlated to the psoas/hip complex. The Order of Transcendence is:

  1. Identification of existence of muscle contraction.
  2. Shifted awareness into breath / away from muscle / into muscle (sending the awareness to different parts of the body with high intensity but with low tissue interaction is the long-term goal)
  3. Over time, tension releases, impressions do not remain in the body, breath & body become one gentle “heave” and more.

Thank you

Popular Science Hoaxes

True Knowledge

I was born with what I consider to be True Knowledge. (*This is not to say that it is Complete Knowledge). Therefore, whenever I was shown teachings that were inconsistent with this true knowledge, I had a “bad feeling”. It probably seems odd to do science on the basis of emotion, but we all have our faith systems, and that is part of mine.

no brakes on the feel train

I, like everyone else, have my own opinions: based on faith & evidence. I am willing to change my position on them, but not without conclusive evidence. Moreover, in the domain of science, multiple answers can solve a problem and they can all be correct. We can also have debate as to which system best parametrizes a phenomenon. For instance, my Fourfold Action Model parametrizes spacetime with a cardinality of 4 (there are only 4 actions in my model: Gravity, Uncertainty, Electricity, Entropy) over 4 orders of magnitude. Thus, someone could conceivably reparametrize causality using different actions and still* have a correct system.

There are infinitely many solutions for a unified field model and I have attempted to find the one of lowest cardinality (with the least number of actions). This is because it’s easier to understand 4 concepts than 5 (or more). This potential for subtle debate does not however extend to demonstrably false ideologies/models. These should be abandoned, for they create cognitive dissonance, which severely hampers one’s ability to assimilate new concepts (this is why I am having an easier time teaching teenagers and people who’ve never studied science than actual “scientists”).

There are no singularities

From Wikipedia:

Screen Shot 2017-04-12 at 11.35.48 AM

This is another way of saying “suspend your disbelief” while mapping concepts. This is known by another name in psychology: cognitive dissonance. Such cultists must use a large amount of mental energy to maintain the set of fundamental incompatible beliefs, so you can understand why I never accepted any theories featuring singularities! (most of them).

“Soft” sciences use sociological cognitive dissonance (i.e.: feminism, communism, hate speech laws etc.) to condition the mind. Hard sciences use logical cognitive dissonance singularities. Such create a stubbornness which renders the cultist unable to think outside of the parameters of his own training. We must emphasize: this is a difficult concept to address. It goes to the heart of conditioning giving the logical conclusion that the body is the minimal “restrictive” parameter. Mental concepts are all restrictions: serving to delineate one concept from another. This cannot be avoided. The question reduces to: which is the optimized parametrization system. I cannot transcend this question, I can only show you my result (proven to be optimized for the configuration space of physical science). This does not mean I transcend religions either, simply that religion can now be summarized as a sociocultural ideology and examined within that ontology. Nothing more. Nothing less.

Do not promote singularities

Like, give me a break. Never talk to me: Kurzweil, unless it’s to apologize.

My model parametrizes spacetime with no need for singularities. It makes all predictions and is great.

How to Scientifically Validate My Claim

Social Sciences

People are taught not to be able to distinguish between a tautology (something that is always true, such as “there is an invisible pony here”) and a predictive hypothesis (such as: my model). While tautologies are useless, predictive hypotheses are how we live. Even words are

Tell someone that reincarnation is unfalsifiable. They will tell you that an unfalsifiable hypothesis isn’t science. (You can thank the piece of garbage Karl Popper for that). Then ask them if Gravity is falsifiable & whether it’s science! Then watch them have cognitive dissonance and forget the whole thing tomorrow!


Physical Sciences

Ask literally anyone about physics. The current unified field theory has 2 false forces (weak and strong nuclear forces). They are false in that they make no predictions, only give descriptions. Science is supposed to make thinking easier by making predictions. It’s not supposed to be used to not confuse people with singularities, like the Big Bang! The entire cosmology du jour rests upon a singularity, proven to cause cognitive dissonance. They are making the hardest subject even impossible! It’s not even worth

Screen Shot 2017-04-12 at 12.22.59 PM

It’s like feminism infected the base node of physics: ick!

That show is really garbage. And I’m not just saying that because everyone likens me to Sheldon. It’s because it paints smart and sensitive people as being uncool, and that’s not cool.

Thank you.