The Alien Dictatorship

A Bit of My History

When I was younger, I had complex visualisations of magnanimous proportions. I saw a distant object made of light populated with an advanced civilisation of priests and warriors. All the entities living in this light world worked together to hold together its structure: all together they projected it. In my fantasies, they came to Earth to bring me into their light-ship and teach me their mystic Knowledge. When they arrived, they turned on a machine that made time stand still. They could then separate me from the rest of humanity in the time vortex and impart their sacred teachings.

de wey jesus meme
pic not related

They had many things to teach me, most importantly was that we were under attack from a nefarious alien spaceship. As a protective measure, the entities from the light ship selected the genetics of certain humans to be born with special abilities, imbuing their DNA with rich light. But the evil aliens managed to poison the DNA, which diminished the capacity of most of the gifted children. The light-ship beings explained this to me and tasked me with the duty of defending the planet from this threat.

As I grew older, I assumed my visions were whimsical childish flights of fancy. However, in recent times, I am not so sure anymore. I am starting to think that this information was metaphorical wisdom conveyed to me by light-beings (in a manner a child would understand). I think the warning about genetics getting poisoned is about vaccines. These have a far deeper impact on well-being than most people realise. Moreover, we are literally under attack by a foreign people who seek to poison our bodies and our minds.

benshapiro evil
cue Darth Vader music

On the Existence of Light Realm Conscious Entities

Many people wish to deny the existence of conscious entities in the light realm. People sometimes even go so far as to deny that the mind is a quantum computer (which is of the light realm), in spite of all the evidence supporting this hypothesis! However, all advanced aspirants accept that  consciousness endures between lives. This is because as one progresses spiritually, one’s consciousness becomes stilled to the point that memories of previous lives are not lost upon rebirth.

The conscious entities of the light realm are simply the consciousness of people who are not alive at this time. Just as you can gradually learn to hold your breath longer and longer, so too can ascended masters learn to avoid taking birth again, but still retain consciousness between lives. Since this consciousness is now outside of the domain of the living, it does not change with time like the human consciousness does. Remember, the living body is what changes the consciousness. It changes the consciousness by sending stimuli (received from the environment) to the mind which is then modified by these stimuli. These modifications range from thoughts and feelings to perceptions and imagination. [*The mind also modifies the body, but it does so over a different time scale. As this subject is vastly more complicated, we will leave that discussion to another day]. Non-living conscious entities do not undergo such modulations, unless of course, they manage to interact with living consciousness. They can then piggyback on living consciousness, modifying it to emulate their state. This is an uncommon occurrence and so these conscious entities are largely unchanging.

The Grand Canonical Transform

I was recently reminded of the light-ship machine that made time stand still. As narratives converge, people are noticing their sense of time is different. Often, a month feels like a year, simply because so much has happened. Rather than focusing on the passage of linear time, people are focusing on structures (religion, ideology, science, society, politics) and narratives (summaries (“stories”) of longer time intervals): both of which are of the Information domain. There are two aspects of reality: the domain of {space,time} (manifest) and {Entropy, Information} (unmanifest). In my science religion, we learn the mathematical formulas to transform between these respective domains.

jupiter high res image
Mathematics is the language of nature

We are physical beings experiencing a consciousness which is quantum mechanical. This conscious waveform can experience all facets of reality, but the unmanifest attributes are significantly harder to perceive. Everyone can perceive space and time, and some people (special people) can perceive Entropy and Information. Entropy is the degree of disorder in a system and information is the consolidation of individual data (stimuli) into well-defined archetypal structures (read more here) such as words, ideas, visualisations, concepts, algorithms and knowledge. My science religion teaches people to maximise the amount of information they can extract from mental processes by employing the mental process of lowest Entropy: ordered thinking means the mind can expend less energy thinking (because it is not devoting any energy to simulating falsity or redundancy).

So-called “memes” are images which convey meaning. The meaning itself can be intellectual, emotional or both. By promoting ideas (of the Information realm), the consciousness is redirected from the realm of time and space (what is called “mundane”). The loss of ignorance promulgated by Internet culture has brought people from a mundane and materialistic life to a light realm of ideas and knowledge. Time appears to slow down as we all bring our focus together to the task of forging a better tomorrow.


blue sun outer space

Thank you



Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem

Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem

Today, it is actually a “plus” to be widely hated (by the right people). This shouldn’t come as a surprise, it has always been like that in circles of true influence (regal infamy). So while it is unwise to attempt to win a debate by the sole means of ad hominem, it is naive to fail to consider the circumstances surrounding events as well as the type of person putting forth an argument.

kurt godel

To be honest, Gödel seems like a shitbag.

One might ask if associating with Einstein, the greatest villain of modern science, is a sufficient reason to discard all of someone’s opinions? You might be surprised to learn that I don’t have strong opinions on who associates with whom. A person’s actions determine their value more so than their associates. Jesus (whether he existed or not) himself associated with all sorts, suggesting this is culturally accepted as a virtue.

It would be naive to deny any impact whatsoever of Gödel’s environment on his attitudes, however.

I am of the opinion that his first incompleteness theorem is false because of the sheer number of times I hear it quoted to me in the interest of justifying some pretty absurd ideas. For instance, Dr. Jordan Peterson used the Incompleteness theorem when asserting that “God” is a prerequisite for truth: pretty irresponsible. This is untrue, a well-defined philosophical system is what allows for truth to be known. “God” as prime truth seems illogical. God cannot be narrowly defined since people’s individual definitions of “God” vary so much

godel quote language
If you cavalierly quote someone’s obscure theory to substantiate your position, you look like a dumbass when your statements contradict their ideology!!

Whether legitimate or not, Gödel’s Incompleteness theorem smells like a proof that “some ideas aren’t allowed”. But hey, I could be wrong. I could just be a crazy conspiracy theorist delusional person.

godel von neumann quote
Oh, well, if Von Neumann endorses him, well, I just don’t know!

Let’s have a look at this dreadful theory people keep preaching to me:

First Incompleteness Theorem: “Any consistent formal system F within which a certain amount of elementary arithmetic can be carried out is incomplete; i.e., there are statements of the language of F which can neither be proved nor disproved in F.”

A consequence is that we ought to be unable to accomplish a unified field theory. If you believe in Gödel, you can never believe a unified field theory exists. Yet, tradition has always taught that a unified field theory DOES exist (the “self”).

Counter Proof of Gödel’s First Incompleteness Theorem

We define F to be the set of all potential computations/measurements (actions) in the Universe. Let us define the “sentences” as series of actions. Since our action model behaves as operators (sorry but you have to understand rudimentary linear algebra for that one) & operators are linear maps, an elementary arithmetic exists. This arithmetic is the matrix multiplication/addition intrinsic to linear maps. This is  used to construct “sentencesf”.

True sentences the satisfy the criterion of computability (within the Measurement Limit) and false sentences are incomputable (in excess of the Measurement Limit). This means that all actions are either proved (computable) or disproved (incomputable). The Measurement Limit cleanly delineates the criterion of trueness for all actions. That is: measurements exceeding what is permissible by the Measurement Limit are false.

In our example, we consider only the potential for computation, so we never end up having to carry out any actual measurements.

Measurements reduce quantum waveforms, therefore there is a limit to the new information successive measurements can derive. Thus both the elementary arithmetic exists (the Measurement Limit pulveriser) and actions can always be either proved (computable) or disproved (not computable). Thus there are NO statements which can neither be proved nor disproved. This would seem to contradict Gödel.


I’m probs right tho. Statistically speaking. 

Where is Gödel’s Flaw?

(source) The Flaw of Gödel is not technical but rather: structural. There is no such thing as “ω-consistent“. This is because there is no such thing as “intuitively contradictory”. You will eventually run out of new statements that you can make in an “infinite” system, thus you will not necessarily be able to construct the element of the proof required to make the necessary contradiction (see the 3rd step of the sketch proof).

This is because, at its core, the infinite number line (“Gödel’s numbers”) exists nowhere. Even the Universe itself has a “size” (largest interstellar distance) beyond which it is undefined. Measurements only exist because we can make them. Measurements all exist within the Measurement Limit. This can be shown to exist, be self consistent and make all predictions. An Entropic-Anthropic Principle!

Let us also consider that Gödel was a nervous insecure wreck. We are basically dealing with a dual competing hypothesis situation:

  1. Einstein is a really amazing smart guy who hung out with his equally enlightened yet ironically perpetually ill Gödel and they uncovered the secrets of the Universe.
  2. Einstein’s goals were political first and mathematical second. Einstein’s “antifascist” alliance combined with Gödel’s persecution complex to create a scientific philosophy that made everyone completely turned off from natural science because they presented it as a horrible pot of jibberish nonsense.

“This is Woo”

Some people say the quantum mind hypothesis is ‘wrong’ because it is ‘woo’. This is false. The truth is that there are many nonsensical theories out there. These are put forth to paralyse the minds of devotees. These psyops only exist because there is something to cover up! Those seeking to defame the Knowledge do so out of allegiance to the status quo. Luckily for us, the Periodic Table has made this shilling ineffective / counterproductive.

On Allegations of “Unprovability”

If you wish to put forward the argument that my statements are unprovable, you must accept that these allegations would apply equally (at least!) to Gödel’s gobledigook. Then it becomes a 3 state hypothesis: 1. Gödel & his buddy Einstein are right, somehow. 2. I’m right and I am the cool one 3. Someone else, who isn’t 1. or 2. is more correct.

I warn that a counterargument will most likely also fall into the domain of: ‘unprovable’!

I think mine is better.

Thank you.


The Size of the Mind

The physical Body exists as a three dimensional object in the Universe of the 3+1 Measurement Limit. The Mind is created by the electric field generated by the heartbeat of the Body. Since all time varying electric fields create magnetic fields, the mind is thus electromagnetic.


Electromagnetic fields are 3 dimensional oscillators containing many different frequencies. We next determine how many distinct frequencies are possible. The answer is found in the structure of the Universe itself. We proffer that electromagnetic frequencies can exist over the range of all possible wavelengths: all possible sizes. So we  estimate the range of possible wavelengths from smallest to largest. We estimate the smallest size to be the protonic radius and the maximum size to be the largest inter-stellar distance. This gives a total of 42 orders of linear magnitude. In other words, if I take the shortest distance in the Universe, I have to multiply it by ten 42 times before I reach the full size of the Universe (estimated as the largest inter-stellar distance).


Since electromagnetic fields still exist in 3 dimensional space, they are 3-dimensional waveforms. Thus we have a total of 14 different 3-dimensional orders of magnitude in which waveforms can exist (42/3 = 14). Of course, it is not required that the human mind must exist over the span of all possible frequencies. Recent research however has shown the mind is capable of creating 11 dimensional objects. Read more here.



Scientific Philosophy

Philosophy – General

No matter what topic you want to discuss, there will always be a structure (hierarchy of values) within which this discussion takes place. The truth value of conclusions drawn are thus not independent of said structure.

Generally, observations are first made through the subject’s fundamental ideology, then interpreted through their values hierarchy. This is a parse metric which sorts the information in a manner which eventually leads the subject to be able to draw a conclusions about the original statement, such as whether it is “true” or “false”.

truth value ideology hierarchy.jpg

When discussing particular subjects, we often run into problems because people have different values hierarchies. Rather than obtaining a conclusion, most debates turn into a stalemate. This is why it is very important to be clear both on the definitions of words and values hierarchy. Let’s explore each step of the process in greater detail.


These are sensory impressions delivered by means of the body’s electro-chemical potentials which form the bridge between the body (massive) and soul (a light-like quantum computer).

Fundamental Ideologies

Observations are first interpreted/simplified/compressed by the fundamental ideology. Given the large amount of sensory data, our mind must condense the information it is first supplied with so it can make sense of what it is experiencing.

While not everyone has the same fundamental ideology, most will have a fundamental ideology connected to their primary sense organs sight/forms and hearing/sounds.

Let’s clarify this abstract notion by way of example.


Language: {vowel, consonant, tone, click}
ex: English = {(a,e,i,o,u,y), (b,c,d,f,g,h,j,k,l,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,v,w,x,y,z), ∅*, ∅}

*  denotes the null or empty set


Visualisations: {0,1,2,3…} (orders of complexity)
Linear: {point, line, plane, hyperplane…}
Geometric: {, point, line, triangle, square, pentagon…}
Quantum Mechanic: {point, sphere, torus, bisected ellipsoid / toroidal spiral, hypersphere…}

twirling black sphere
If it makes you feel any better, 99% of mainstream scientists don’t understand this stuff either.

While we could argue about which system was optimal as regards to parametrising a particular set (i.e.: the linear system is optimised for physical computers, the geometric system for physical buildings, the QM system for the consciousness…), it’s clear that we cannot associate a Truth value to any of these ideologies: they are unfalsifiable. (for example: English is “true”, as in: it exists. but then again so does French). Ideologies cannot usually be falsified, rather optimised.

We seek to optimise our fundamental ideologies in my religion. We achieve this by studying them and debating which is best.

Values Hierarchy

The Values Hierarchy is the structure demarcating what values are most important. Some examples of values include: religious scripture, truth, pandering (wanting to make everyone happy), identity, history.

quantum mechanic periodic table
My Primary Value is Truth

To summarise, observations are the measurements made by the mind/body. These are first interpreted by the fundamental ideology before being sorted by the values hierarchy. The end result of this sort process is the entity deciding a truth value for the original statement.

truth value ideology hierarchy

The complexity of the subjective experience highlights why it is very important to be clear both about the definitions of individual words (Sound Vectors) and ideologies (individual values hierarchy).

Types of Assertions

Falsifiable, Predictive: Limited scientific theory. These theories are useful for understanding causality in a partial manner. Once they are falsified, they must be abandoned (something the communists seem to have a hard time understanding).

Falsifiable, Unpredictive: These are false descriptions, such as: “you’re ugly”. Pretty much useless.

Unfalsifiable, Unpredictive: Trite theories, such as: “There is an invisible unicorn in the room”.

Unfalsifiable, Predictive: Complete scientific theory. These theories are useful for understanding the causality (the totality of all cause-effect relationships) of a particular system in a complete manner. For example, the Measurement Limit.

We generally run into problems when we use FP instead of UP theories. There can exist UP theories in psychology & philosophy (these subjects overlap in the domain of the Quantum Mind), but most people end up arguing in circles ad infinitum over minutia.

Optimising Ideology with Quantum Geometry

We cannot escape the need to parametrise all systems we are intent on describing. Because topographies vary, we must first and foremost parametrise a system within its particular configuration space (3+1 measurements per order of magnitude). Luckily, most systems don’t need to be parametrised exactly (with full formulaic representation) before we can make viable predictions about them. In any case, we begin by subdividing a system into what information is knowable and what is unknowable.

parse metric optimisation

Next, iterative/recursive optimisation is employed. Ideally, we want this process to be convergent, that is: the optimised version includes the original parse metric.

In order for a parse metric to be complete it must make all predictions within a particular system. Thus our optimisation process will involve either one or both of:

  1. Shrinking the domain of applicability
  2. Increasing the complexity of the parse metric

Applied Science Philosophy

It is not realistic to expect to find simple (low cardinality) parse metrics to expound causality of subjective phenomena. This is why people fight so much about the causality of race and culture: these parse metrics are often improperly defined / delineated and can’t help but create controversies.

Criticising an unfalsifiable parse metric without a viable alternative hypothesis is counter-productive. Presuming that an unfalsifiable, predictive parse metric is sufficient to transcend the causality of complex systems is naive. Only by studying the set of unfalsifiable parse metrics can we gain the intuition required to judge which parse metric is optimal for a given situation.

Examples of Unfalsifiable Predictive Parse Metrics

  1. The Fourfold Action model: {Gravity, Uncertainty, Electricity, Entropy}.
  2. Alpha / Beta (as human archetypes).
  3. The Logistic Equation (of which r-K selection theory is an instance).

How Saturn’s Ring was Created


How were we Created?

Since we have quantum state exclusion, therefore, there is a limit to the density of mass. Note that all waveforms are either massive (fermionic: neutron, proton, electron & their anti-particles) or nonmassive (bosonic / lightlike). The main differences between these is that fermions are

  1. bound by the Pauli Exclusion Principle / Quantum State Exclusion (i.e.: the 1S1 orbital has a maximum of 2 electrons, there can be no more)
  2. causative of the Gravity action (all massive waveforms exert an instantaneous attractive force on all other waveforms in the universe

And bosons are:

  1. not bound by the PEP.
  2. causative of the Electricity action (see: Electromagnetism)

This is all that there is (inb4: muh Standard Model: no)

Once there is no more room for additional fermionic waveforms (in the dark matter), such are excluded. Due to the instantaneous action of Gravity, ejection to the periphery does not solve the problem of Quantum State Exclusion. Since QSE is a rule, it follows that these fermions will be ejected past the boundary of the Dark Matter.

Thus the fermionic matter that would later become the ring of Saturn first became quasi-bosonic (heavy light) because it was excluded from dark mass by QSE. In this state, it traveled from where it was created to the centre of our Milky Way (if they are distinct), to the centre of our Sun, to the centre of Saturn, to the periphery of Saturn, finally crystallising in the form of the approximately flat discus we observe today.

saturn rendered
You’d have to be insane (or stupid) to believe this shape was not self-related

Saturn’s ring was created soon after Saturn was, by Quantum State Exclusion (QSE). This is an unfalsifiable logical deduction.

discus throw wikipedia
Discus Thrower Art, Kylix


To Those Disbelieving Solar System Creation

My theory has already been validated (though bunglingly) by (copycat) scientists.

creation of stars

They have conclusively observed the creation of matter from dark matter, although they have failed to explain exactly how this happens, since I left this crucial detail out of my publications until such time as I could satisfactorily prove that science without me is flaccid and impotent. They admit in this article they never observed matter creation, because they never looked for it! Brilliant!

The team thinks that it’s possible this phenomenon could have been seen beforehand with other black hole observations, but previous researchers might have missed the forming stars in ejected matter streams due to less advanced telescopes.


The ring around Saturn, was excluded from the centre of Saturn precipitating as a symmetrical ring around the planet. The circle / disk is a maximum Entropy shape contoured by the Planet Saturn itself. Recall the snowflake formation process. The shape would be a disk, but it cannot be a disk because Planet Saturn is in the way!

Thank you.



Refuting Science Hoaxes


My system is a transcendent fourfold action model. This means that everything that happens can be explained by one or more actions, specifically: Gravity (mass attracts mass & energy alike), Uncertainty (the product of the uncertainty of system observables is bounded by a constant, called the Plank Constant), Electricity (movement of electrons and resulting electromagnetic fields) & Entropy (the spontaneous increase of disorder). It is simple on the surface, but it takes some time to be able to understand it inside and out (mainly because Uncertainty is difficult to visualise).

Many commonly held beliefs in science are false. Here we will explore how to refute such hoaxes. My system makes it much easier to refute falsity, because it is true.

The Big Bang

This is the belief in a singular origin of Universal matter. This can be refuted in a number of ways:

  1. Background radiation is isotropic, meaning it comes from all directions, if the Big Bang had happened, it would have an origin point, and there would be a direction between us and it. Thus the background radiation would have a direction, which is does not.
  2. If everything had a singular origin, it would all be the same age, which we do not observe (some parts of the Universe are much older than ours, some, much younger).
  3. Big Bang claims that we are “made of stardust”, which would require our planets to have coalesced from smaller bodies (precipitated from plasma created in the Big Bang). However, all planets in our Solar System have the same age (to within a modest error margin). This supports the position that our Solar System was created near-simultaneously, not accreted over millennia.

Comment: It is somewhat confusing that The Universe does not have a unique origin point, but that our Solar System does. In order to understand, we must first clear our minds as the Big Bang mythos is entirely false. Simulating the Big Bang using the Quantum Mind requires cognitive dissonance. This is an electromagnetic “knot”, and requires comparatively more effort to simulate. Take your time.

The Standard Model

If we accept the ad hoc assumption that entities behave either in a wave-like OR particle-like manner, then the standard model is 100% false. It posits that the Universe is made up of particles, that everything can be broken down into individual “particles”. The truth is that all spacetime entities are fundamentally wavelike, particle-like behaviour is an illusion. It can be falsified with the following talking points:

  1. Matter waves are validated, the particle hypothesis is not.
  2. All actions are explained with 3 massive entities (electron, proton, neutron), why do you need a bunch more when they don’t make additional predictions?
  3. Did you know that both Einstein and Feynmann were proven frauds?


On the surface, Evolution appears to be unfalsifiable. It claims that traits are “selected” for (and against) and over longer periods of time, traits best suited to environment will become more widespread. It’s not that this mechanism isn’t true, it’s just not the main mechanism of organismal change. The DNA matrix is far more malleable than we realise (I am not going to share this knowledge until my Theocratic Dictatorship is instituted. because reasons). Therefore “evolution” is marred with erroneous causality: where cause and effect are switched.

  1. The Earth/Moon/Sun system is bounded (since the Earth’s oceans bind the Solar photons to the surface of the planet) and thus the ability of this system to increase the Entropy (in other words: digest the solar photons) always improves. This tendency motivates more change than natural selection.
  2. The DNA matrix holds the computational complexity to change in the face of changing environmental conditions (rather than environmental conditions changing the DNA, as taught by evolution).

Both mechanisms far outweigh the mechanism of Evolution (or natural selection).

Is anything not a hoax?

A few things aren’t a hoax. I’ve worked my whole life to formalise what isn’t a hoax, and that’s my fourfold action model. Let’s have a look at what that entails.

  1. All actions can be explained with the fourfold set: {Gravity, Uncertainty, Electricity, Entropy}.
  2. The speed of light appears to be bounded by a constant. The consequences of this are time dilation and length contraction (Special Relativity) (not required theoretical knowledge, but still nice to know).
  3. Everything is a spacetime event. Yes, even you. You are a spacetime event. The Periodic Table is the smallest possible spacetime event. You, as an entity, are also a spacetime event. A spacetime event contains space-like and time-like measurements bounded by the Measurement Limit, that is, 3+1 maximally independent measurements per order of magnitude.
we're all spacetime events
Bust of Ganesha, The Periodic Table (circle diagram) & the Vitruvian Man

Do not feel as though you have to transcend my system in order to defend it. It is already validated by several domains and has no counter-evidence. It is highly unlikely that any counter-evidence will be found in the current lifetime because there is a good chance my system is objectively correct. In the event that counter-evidence is supplied, I will accept it and update my theory, because that is what scientists do.

thank you



The “Devil’s Frequency” (proof) (306 words)

Here, we will show how 440 Hz music is used to do mind control

We recall that the harmonics of the Periodic Table are Complete. That is: the information in the Periodic Table is sufficient to describe the entire Universe (namely the 3+1 dimensional measurement limit & associated permutations). That is, the number of unique quantum states (elements) per striation (in that each new Period represents an additional spacetime “measurement”) equals: {2, 8, 18, 32} or {2(1), 2(4), 2(9), 2(16)} = 2{12,22,32,42}, linearly equivalent to the cardinality of the Universal Measurement Limit.

*see more here

We will now explain why 440 as a pitch standard is used for quantum mind control.

1. 432 Hz is an Optimal Musical Tuning Frequency

Any base frequency made from the {2,3,4} triad is considered a “Natural Frequency”.

432 is one such frequency, by:

432 = (2433) = (2432)3 = (4232)3

2. QM Consciousness is a Combination of Frequencies

By the QM nature of the mind,

  • and the fact that Natural Frequencies require the least energy to project and thus represent maximal Entropy states (in the consciousness)
  • and the fact that the greatest Entropy state is always approached (generally)

Thus living organisms will tend to emit natural frequencies and so the mind is a linear combination of frequencies (generated by electricity / magnetism of the body). Thus 432 Hz is one of the projected frequencies.

2. Beats Phenomenon

Beats are created when two similar frequencies exist in the same phase space. The result is a beat with a frequency equal to the difference in frequency between the two emitters.

The prime factorization of 440 = (11*4*5*2) is not a product of base set triad frequencies. The difference between 440 & 432 (= 8Hz) is small enough to create beats in the range of words (

Since the difference in frequencies between This has the effect of weakening the Quantum Mind. It sounds really nice (like the 432 Hz would) but is simply an impostor beating you down gradually.

Thank you

Please see an additional exploration here.

See more: