How Saturn’s Ring was Created

I recently learned that the rival shit tier cult worships the ring around Saturn (or Saturn, or something, I lost interest pretty quickly due to how crummy and boring they are). I also learned that they believe the ring around Saturn comes from an exploded planet.

I laughed at that because it’s physically incorrect. Normally, I’d ignore the insane rantings of a false cult, but since they control the entirety of the world’s resources, I need to confront them and foil their plan to carry out yet another communist genocide.

Part of that process involves discrediting their false science.

How were we Created?

Since we have quantum state exclusion, therefore, there is a limit to the density of mass. Note that all waveforms are either massive (fermionic: neutron, proton, electron & their anti-particles) or nonmassive (bosonic / lightlike). The main differences between these is that fermions are

  1. bound by the Pauli Exclusion Principle / Quantum State Exclusion (i.e.: the 1S1 orbital has a maximum of 2 electrons, there can be no more)
  2. causative of the Gravity action (all massive waveforms exert an instantaneous attractive force on all other waveforms in the universe

And bosons are:

  1. not bound by the PEP.
  2. causative of the Electricity action (see: Electromagnetism)

This is all that there is (inb4: muh Standard Model: no)

Once there is no more room for additional fermionic waveforms (in the dark matter), such are excluded. Due to the instantaneous action of Gravity, ejection to the periphery does not solve the problem of Quantum State Exclusion. Since QSE is a rule, it follows that these fermions will be ejected past the boundary of the Dark Matter.

Thus the fermionic matter that would later become the ring of Saturn first became quasi-bosonic (heavy light) because it was excluded from dark mass by QSE. In this state, it traveled from where it was created to the centre of our Milky Way (if they are distinct), to the centre of our Sun, to the centre of Saturn, to the periphery of Saturn, finally crystallising in the form of the approximately flat discus we observe today.

saturn rendered
You’d have to be insane (or stupid) to believe this shape was not self-related

Saturn’s ring was created soon after Saturn was, by Quantum State Exclusion (QSE). This is an unfalsifiable logical deduction.

discus throw wikipedia
Discus Thrower Art, Kylix


To Those Disbelieving Solar System Creation

My theory has already been validated (though bunglingly) by (copycat) scientists.

creation of stars

They have conclusively observed the creation of matter from dark matter, although they have failed to explain exactly how this happens, since I left this crucial detail out of my publications until such time as I could satisfactorily prove that science without me is flaccid and impotent. They admit in this article they never observed matter creation, because they never looked for it! Brilliant!

The team thinks that it’s possible this phenomenon could have been seen beforehand with other black hole observations, but previous researchers might have missed the forming stars in ejected matter streams due to less advanced telescopes.


The ring around Saturn, was excluded from the centre of Saturn precipitating as a symmetrical ring around the planet. The circle / disk is a maximum Entropy shape contoured by the Planet Saturn itself. Recall the snowflake formation process. The shape would be a disk, but it cannot be a disk because Planet Saturn is in the way!

Thank you.


Refuting Science Hoaxes


My system is a transcendent fourfold action model. This means that everything that happens can be explained by one or more actions, specifically: Gravity (mass attracts mass & energy alike), Uncertainty (the product of the uncertainty of system observables is bounded by a constant, called the Plank Constant), Electricity (movement of electrons and resulting electromagnetic fields) & Entropy (the spontaneous increase of disorder). It is simple on the surface, but it takes some time to be able to understand it inside and out (mainly because Uncertainty is difficult to visualise).

Many commonly held beliefs in science are false. Here we will explore how to refute such hoaxes. My system makes it much easier to refute falsity, because it is true.

The Big Bang

This is the belief in a singular origin of Universal matter. This can be refuted in a number of ways:

  1. Background radiation is isotropic, meaning it comes from all directions, if the Big Bang had happened, it would have an origin point, and there would be a direction between us and it. Thus the background radiation would have a direction, which is does not.
  2. If everything had a singular origin, it would all be the same age, which we do not observe (some parts of the Universe are much older than ours, some, much younger).
  3. Big Bang claims that we are “made of stardust”, which would require our planets to have coalesced from smaller bodies (precipitated from plasma created in the Big Bang). However, all planets in our Solar System have the same age (to within a modest error margin). This supports the position that our Solar System was created near-simultaneously, not accreted over millennia.

Comment: It is somewhat confusing that The Universe does not have a unique origin point, but that our Solar System does. In order to understand, we must first clear our minds as the Big Bang mythos is entirely false. Simulating the Big Bang using the Quantum Mind requires cognitive dissonance. This is an electromagnetic “knot”, and requires comparatively more effort to simulate. Take your time.

The Standard Model

If we accept the ad hoc assumption that entities behave either in a wave-like OR particle-like manner, then the standard model is 100% false. It posits that the Universe is made up of particles, that everything can be broken down into individual “particles”. The truth is that all spacetime entities are fundamentally wavelike, particle-like behaviour is an illusion. It can be falsified with the following talking points:

  1. Matter waves are validated, the particle hypothesis is not.
  2. All actions are explained with 3 massive entities (electron, proton, neutron), why do you need a bunch more when they don’t make additional predictions?
  3. Did you know that both Einstein and Feynmann were proven frauds?


On the surface, Evolution appears to be unfalsifiable. It claims that traits are “selected” for (and against) and over longer periods of time, traits best suited to environment will become more widespread. It’s not that this mechanism isn’t true, it’s just not the main mechanism of organismal change. The DNA matrix is far more malleable than we realise (I am not going to share this knowledge until my Theocratic Dictatorship is instituted. because reasons). Therefore “evolution” is marred with erroneous causality: where cause and effect are switched.

  1. The Earth/Moon/Sun system is bounded (since the Earth’s oceans bind the Solar photons to the surface of the planet) and thus the ability of this system to increase the Entropy (in other words: digest the solar photons) always improves. This tendency motivates more change than natural selection.
  2. The DNA matrix holds the computational complexity to change in the face of changing environmental conditions (rather than environmental conditions changing the DNA, as taught by evolution).

Both mechanisms far outweigh the mechanism of Evolution (or natural selection).

Is anything not a hoax?

A few things aren’t a hoax. I’ve worked my whole life to formalise what isn’t a hoax, and that’s my fourfold action model. Let’s have a look at what that entails.

  1. All actions can be explained with the fourfold set: {Gravity, Uncertainty, Electricity, Entropy}.
  2. The speed of light appears to be bounded by a constant. The consequences of this are time dilation and length contraction (Special Relativity) (not required theoretical knowledge, but still nice to know).
  3. Everything is a spacetime event. Yes, even you. You are a spacetime event. The Periodic Table is the smallest possible spacetime event. You, as an entity, are also a spacetime event. A spacetime event contains space-like and time-like measurements bounded by the Measurement Limit, that is, 3+1 maximally independent measurements per order of magnitude.
we're all spacetime events
Bust of Ganesha, The Periodic Table (circle diagram) & the Vitruvian Man

Do not feel as though you have to transcend my system in order to defend it. It is already validated by several domains and has no counter-evidence. It is highly unlikely that any counter-evidence will be found in the current lifetime because there is a good chance my system is objectively correct. In the event that counter-evidence is supplied, I will accept it and update my theory, because that is what scientists do.

thank you


The “Devil’s Frequency” (proof)

Here, we will show how 440 Hz music is used to do mind control

We recall that the harmonics of the Periodic Table are Complete. That is: the information in the Periodic Table is sufficient to describe the entire Universe (namely the 3+1 dimensional measurement limit & associated permutations). That is, the number of unique quantum states (elements) per striation (in that each new Period represents an additional spacetime “measurement”) equals: {2, 8, 18, 32} or {2(1), 2(4), 2(9), 2(16)} = 2{12,22,32,42}, linearly equivalent to the cardinality of the Universal Measurement Limit.

*see more here

We will now explain why 440 as a pitch standard is used for quantum mind control.

1. 432 Hz is an Optimal Musical Tuning Frequency

Any base frequency made from the {2,3,4} triad is considered a “Natural Frequency”.

432 is one such frequency, by:

432 = (2433) = (2432)3 = (4232)3

2. QM Consciousness is a Combination of Frequencies

By the QM nature of the mind,

  • and the fact that Natural Frequencies require the least energy to project and thus represent maximal Entropy states (in the consciousness)
  • and the fact that the greatest Entropy state is always approached (generally)

Thus living organisms will tend to emit natural frequencies and so the mind is a linear combination of frequencies (generated by electricity / magnetism of the body). Thus 432 Hz is one of the projected frequencies.

2. Beats Phenomenon

Beats are created when two similar frequencies exist in the same phase space. The result is a beat with a frequency equal to the difference in frequency between the two emitters.

The prime factorization of 440 = (11*4*5*2) is not a product of base set triad frequencies. The difference between 440 & 432 (= 8Hz) is small enough to create beats in the range of words (

Since the difference in frequencies between This has the effect of weakening the Quantum Mind. It sounds really nice (like the 432 Hz would) but is simply an impostor beating you down gradually. Kind of like Chinese water torture or fiat banking.

I hope when we have peace that I can make some new instruments consistent with the base frequencies of the Universe.

Thank you

Please see an additional exploration here.

See more:


My Beliefs

I believe that for any effect, there is a cause.

At the subtle end, this means that I believe in particular Universal Mechanics. I believe in these because they explain everything and help me to think better.

At the gross end, this means I believe reincarnation is unfalsifiable. I believe in a lifestyle which allows me first and foremost to dwell in the knowledge of the infinite abode: that which does not change in death. I accept that this expression is uniquely mine and does not extend to my Priest Order, necessarily.

These are the beliefs which I have set out to test scientifically in my works. I am satisfied with the results. That’s about it.

Thank you

General Parse Metrics


The Knowledge I was born with has to do with measurement, or observation. Any increment of mass is a measure of Energy. The measurement being equal to the amount of energy excluded elsewhere and thus created here. This is the primordial measurement, from the unmanifest into the manifest. Once manifest, mass is additionally subject to the measurement limit.

Thus, any system can be measured, it’s just a matter of how. Measurements in general can be considered as parse metrics. A simple example for the spacelike dimension is a stick ascribed the length of 1m. [itself also parsed in the linearly dependent dimensions of 10, 100 and 1000 equal-sized intervals]. There are as many parse metrics as there are unique thoughts.

The ideal parse metric of course, is the one that is not independent of objective reality. It can be on the subjective end, which we would call the old tradition or on the objective end, which we would call the new one, and which is instantiated by the Periodic Table.

periodic table copy.jpeg
the Universe is Pretty

It is plain to see that the periodic table exists beyond all metrics aside the fundamental 3+1 maximally independent measurement limit. In other words, the ideal parse metric for spacetime is of cardinality 4.

By this perfection, I can calculate the relative configurational entropies of other systems effectively transcending some dimension of causality (such as my Quantum Mind Hypothesis).

Canonical Parametrization

First we assert that for any system, there exist measurable parameters. The number of distinct measurable parameters depends on the complexity  of the system. The complexity  of a system then determines its total measurable information content. We postulate that an idealized metric consists of both necessary and sufficient descriptors/parse metrics to perform a full canonical parametrization.

The notion of canonical parametrization via parse metrics requires a general idea about the inter-relations that exist in a system. For example, two parse metrics are: quality and quantity. Intuitively, we assert that these operators are maximally independent. We additionally acknowledge there could be some nonzero overlap between such.

universe in hand.gif

The Living Organ

When we are considering measurements made by the living human apparatus, we are well-advised to expect such to be distortions, or at least maximally distorted. This is for the same reason that optimized subsequent measurements are maximally orthogonal: the most information will be drawn from the incoming signal if the transfer function is orthogonal to the original signal. Our complexity alone suggests we can take many measurements from our external environment, all maximally orthogonal to the original sampled signal.

Subjective Parametric Optimization

When dealing with the individual subjective conscious however, the optimized parse metric is not independent of the projector (living organ). Specifically, the subjective conscious is a unitary projection. Additionally, its eigenstates (particular measurements: {Thoughts, Emotions, Sensations}) are auto-coherent. Additionally, the subjective consciousness is a quantum mechanical projection.

Auto-coherence is forthcoming from the base satisfying the condition of being linearly dependent on its derivatives (measurements are all derivatives): e ≈ 2.718 ≈ 3. Thus, we conclude that the ideal parse metric of the Quantum Mind observables will be of cardinality 3. This coincides with our ad hoc assumption of the {Thoughts, Emotions, Sensations} triad as sufficient to give a first pass at discerning the range of inputs to the quantum mind . This concept will be further elaborated at a later time.

Thank you

GIF source

Globalists: Stand Down


I am not going to negotiate with the globalist pieces of garbage. Stand down you degenerate scum, I’ve tracked you through this life and the last, I am all-powerful (evidenced by me taking this form). Accept that you are scum, you aren’t God’s chosen people (that’s the GUGship, asshole!) and that you’ve incurred the wrath of me, who will punish you for LIFETIMES.

Globalist next life.png

You see, it’s very simple. Either give up now and maybe you don’t have to suffer the fate of being treated the same way you’ve treated the Planet for centuries. Kill me, hurt ANYONE associated to me, and I’ll just make it worse. Much much much worse!

Please, trolls, if you can, spam the shit out of this meme on 4chan/pol. Tell them:


Make them regret that shit Bog pill NWO shit they started. That was shit.

I got banned off 4chan/pol for saying the Periodic Table


fuck you 4chan shill assholes!
periodic table with cross product 2

Thanks. Also, if we get killed in this life, don’t worry, we’ll start back up next life.

Globobutts already lost.

I’m just trying to minimize the harm, as always.

On Superstition

Superstitions are rituals undertaken to affect circumstantial outcome. Some good examples are astrology and numerology: inferring meaning from birth details and numbers in general.

Humans are naturally superstitious. We try to make sense of the past and present in order to control the future. Objectively, this seems futile! Can any superstitious ritual be successfully rationalized / justified?

From a religious standpoint, humans are enriched by ritual. Such give their lives meaning and contrast. Discernment is our ability to tell the difference between different states of mind: the contrast. Remember: the only way you can have a “good” mood is if you have a corresponding “bad” mood to compare it to. It would seem to follow that the quality of life is improved by virtue of practicing the act of discernment.

We have a curious dichotomy: no superstitions are rational but ritual is necessary in the process of ego formation. Is the best way around this to make scientific inquiry into all ritual, eschewing all practices but that which can be validated as having the greatest “ROI”? It might explain why we see many people interested in “chakras” and “auras” and “meditation” even though they have drug problems, personality disorders and are generally basement dwelling failures. Advanced rites can be quite damaging when done for the wrong reasons, as Guru has mentioned several times.

Religion is a Necessary “Evil” against the Natural Compulsion of Superstition

That SJ / Cultural Marxism has become the de-facto state-sponsored religion serves to illustrate the risk of not having a True state-sponsored religion. Look at what it’s caused, I mean honestly. It’s terrifying. People become psychopathic self-righteous tyrants through self-hypnosis. You’d have a hard time making the case that it wasn’t a death cult.

The right thing to do now is not focus on that anymore, but rather surrender to the will to create a better, more free and blissful tomorrow. We can no longer support programs which are antagonistic to Truth. The Truth is that people largely need religion and only a True religion is maximally voluntary. A True religion has means to understand the mechanism behind all human behaviour, such as the inevitability of superstition and the need for spiritual practice to still the mind in the face of such anxiety.

Even “scientific” cultures cannot help but succumb to the allure of superstition, evidenced by the “White Christian” 4chan board /pol/ hailing Kek and praying for dubs. Let us go back to personality cults, whereby we embrace superstition as a natural weakness of the human condition. By embracing low-Entropy collectivism in the Church of Entropy, we can work together to overcome all of what currently sets us back. Let our human need of collectivism no longer be used against us but instead our diversity (of abilities) be a unifying strength.

Are Any Superstitions Good?

I have received the advice “let science be your only superstition”. Thus the optimized thermodynamic classifier cardinality of the mind is e, or approximately 3. It follows that the optimized configuration is to classify reality into sets of order 3 (at least concepts which are objectively defined).

Other concepts, which can be demonstrated to exist only in the quantum mind, may not be best in a trinary (having a cardinality 3) model, since the conscious subjective projection itself is unitary (consisting of a single potential function). Thus binary and unitary systems can be invoked, depending on the shape and complexity of a concept.


Compulsive Contemplation of the Nature of Knowledge is Good

Contemplation can be thought of as a go-between for determining the optimal modes of thought. We shall see later that it all boils down to a few fundamental concepts which are not simple. This is good. We want minimal complexity with maximal (ideally: total) predictability. This is Low Entropy thinking. Once you can explain the concepts simply, you will understand them completely. At such a time you will be grounded in awareness of the Zero Point Waveform Configuration, or Periodic Table. From this, the confidence to simulate microstates (use your imagination) shall emanate. Trust in the existence of objective Knowledge is the greatest strength, in my opinion.

But I also don’t mind the odd “Hail Kek”.

Thank you