The Fallacy of Individualism

Is there such a thing as an individual?

Collective identities are archetype systems. For example, Marxism stratifies society along materialistic lines: proletariat & bourgeoisie. The collective identity of Christianity idealises the personality of Jesus, evoking self-sacrifice, patience and generosity in its followers. While they are not always aware of this motivation, members of a collective strive towards the ideal of their archetype system. While we all exist as individual conscious entities, an individual has no distinctiveness without a corresponding collective: archetype system.

Can a patient exist without a doctor? Can a student exist without a teacher? The answer is no, and it is because the former requires the latter to even be defined in the first place. A Doctor can exist without a patient, but not without an organisation which bestows upon him the authority to practice. In fact, all but one archetype requires an associated collective. The archetype which does not require a collective is the archetype which creates all others: the God archetype. The God archetype exists whether or not anything else does.

Religion Creates Culture

I think many people will be resistant to this idea, but I ask that you keep an open mind. Remember that the word “culture” derives from cult (a religious organisation) and so it is logical that civilisations spontaneously progress towards a Theocratic Dictatorship.

This simple fact is why the likes of Sargon of Akkad (debate here and “after party” here)  will always reach absurd conclusions when attempting to place the “individual” as the highest ideal. This strategy will fail because it contradicts the fundamental archetype of God. God alone is worthy of worship, not the ego. Individualism is a form of ego worship. Ego worship causes the consciousness to be directed inward. While everyone has an ego, true spiritual practice requires the consciousness to be outwardly directed in order to experience expanded consciousness.

black sun.gif
don’t get your ego caught up your own ass.

“Individualism” is a Selfish and Unnatural Ideology

“Individualism” is nothing more than self-aggrandisement. In fact, it is a cruel ideology because those of inferior intellect need collectivism. While those of superior intellect can “make do” without collectivism, those lacking a fully formed ego require a rigid hierarchy around which to frame their identity (so that they can actualise their archetype, optimise their archetype and ultimately transcend their (and all) sociological archetype(s)). Traditional teachings have always emphasised the importance of optimising ones adherence to their natural archetype.

The Solution to Shitty Collectivism is Optimised Collectivism

All forms of collectivism should be eschewed in favour of Theocratic Dictatorship. This system of government allows for anyone to join the governing class, provided they are considered fit. When a new recruit is brought on board, an existing priest must stake their reputation on their behaviour. If the new recruit commits a bannable offence (the High Priest Collective decides what constitutes a bannable offence), then the honour of the recruiter is diminished and the recruit is shunned. This system may sound harsh to the uninitiated but remains nonetheless the best defence against . To wield power over others, one must be held accountable and to the highest possible standard. People must be dis-incentivised from corruption to the greatest possible extent.

government gugvernment
where’s the lie tho?

Individuals Will Always Fail Against a Unified Collective

With the exception of the God archetype (who can defeat any opposition), individuals tend to fail when going up against collectives. Collectives contain numerous people and their combined brainpower and physical might usually overpower those operating alone or by “muh individualism”.

The MSM has made such a golem out of the Alt-Right that it has become a type of virtue signalling to attempt to criticise, “debunk” and “take down” this “organisation”. This often proves easier said than done.

Screen Shot 2018-01-11 at 10.12.17 AM
No, you didn’t.

The “Personal Freedom / Rights” Fallacy

People don’t usually know what they are talking about when they invoke the “muh rights” argument. This is fallacious. Human rights do exist, but they derive from God, not man. Laws are man-made and can either reflect the Natural Law or (as is the case in the current system) fight it tooth and nail. The problem with “human rights” as ideals is that one person’s positive “right” will necessarily be a violation of someone else’s “right” wherever resources are scarce. This subtlety is often overlooked by those of lower intellect.

The Proper Approach is r-K Selection Theory

r-K selection theory is a good dual (containing 2 elements) pulveriser function to use as a first pass ideology for genetic migration. This means we can continue to infer increasingly more precise measurements at all orders of magnitude from this system. We just have to make sure that we accurately define exactly what is meant by r and K type behaviour. For this, we always return to the original definition: K-type behaviour is near carrying capacity and r-type behaviour is far carrying capacity. Thus this pulveriser will be accurate as long as it is properly parametrised.

If you are interested in this subject, you can learn more here.

It is also a worthwhile endeavour to learn how to derive the logistic differential equation, from which r-K selection theory derives.

Thank you



Fruits of Theosophy

The Theosophical Society has updated their symbolism, either in an admission of failure to earn the title of Truth Religion or as a means of “squeezing out” good knowledge symbols, or both. Anyone with any discernment can see the gradual “unmasking” of their true intention.

Screen Shot 2017-11-04 at 12.00.03 AM
Progression of the seal of the Theosophic Society

The simple fact is that this society has no right to call itself the truth religion. I will now address the Colonel’s Rebuttal from 1882.

Response to Colonel Olcott’s Rebuttal

See rebuttal here.

Though I will address the statement of the Colonel, I don’t need to, given the state of extreme disrepair society has fallen into since the Theosophic Society was given the authority of Truth religion. In my opinion, they have disqualified themselves by their obsequious dilution of teachings, most notably in false equivalences and baseless presumptions of expertise in psychological knowledge.

On the Accusation of Unsoundness of Mind of Swami Dayananda

The Colonel’s rebuttal opens with an ad hominem that doesn’t abate for the majority of the publication, suggesting his position is weak. It is also unbecoming of a supposed spiritual leader to launch personal attacks. Accusing Swami of mental unsoundness is as loathsome as it is unfounded.

While this criticism hurts me more than most, I shall refrain from an emotional response and simply state: upon what basis does the Colonel make this judgement; i.e.: what is his expertise to judge the soundness of Swami’s mind?

Swami sounds perfectly fine to me in his correspondence, unlike the Colonel, who is rigid in his attachment to the belief that he and his associates are owed the honour of leading the Truth religion. Thus it is the Colonel which is likely afflicted with delusions of grandeur & lacks the capacity to see the inherent hypocrisy in his statements.

On Opposition to Secrecy of Knowledge

From the Colonel’s correspondence:

Firstly, I note that the minds of those who have studied and practised Yoga science, are continually oppressed with the conviction that a profound secrecy must be ever maintained as to the esoteric instruction given them. It is the most difficult thing in the world to get a Yogi, or even a Yogi’s Chela (pupil), to say what he has learned, or where, or when, or of whom.


This is not a bad thing. It is entirely up to the learned masters to decide when/if they give knowledge. Maybe if you actually had some knowledge, you would have more reverence for its secrecy. Giving out secret/sacred knowledge can cause devotees to gain powers. What happens when/if the devotees misuse their powers? These things are kept secret for a very good reason.

Even in the modern day, most teachings remain secret.


On the Criticism of a Personal God

This is one of those times where the Colonel and his devotees should have put their emotions aside and cultivated the discipline to understand the teachings.

“Either we have been especially unfortunate in misconceiving the ideas of our revered Swami Dayanund, as conveyed to us in his valued letters to me, or he teaches a doctrine to which our Council, and nearly all our Fellows, are forced to dissent. Briefly, we understand him as pointing us towards a more or less personal God – to one of finite attributes, of varying emotions – one to be adored in set phrases, to be conciliated – one capable of displeasure….. I cannot worship him in such a guise. The Deity of my spiritual perceptions is that Eternal Principle which I understood you to say, was what the Arya Samaj recognized as contradistinguished from the personal God of the Unitarian Bramhos. Relying upon this view of the case, I united with our Sister H. P. Blavatsky to carry through the Council the vote of affiliation and allegiance. When! along comes the Swami’s letter speaking of a God whom at least Brother Chrisnavarma’s translation points to us as a Being of parts and passions – at least of the latter if not the former, and at once we two are taken to task. Protests from every side, a hasty reconsideration of the former sweeping vote of affiliation, the adoption of a resolution to make the Theosophical Society of the Arya Samaj, a Vedic Section instead of the whole body in a transformed shape, and the consignment to the flames of the whole edition of the proposed circular and preparation of a revised introduction to the “Rules of the Arya Samaj” – these thing followed. Perhaps it as well as it is, for we keep a broader platform for men of various creeds to stand upon, and our work for and with the Arya Samaj, is not to be affected in the least. We will be just as zealous and loyal as heretofore, will send the Initiation Fees the same as ever, and continue to regard the revered Swami as dutifully and our Hindu Brothers as affectionately as though this shadow had not passed athwart our horizon. I wish you would define to me somewhat more clearly just what is the doctrine of the Arya Samaj respecting God and the divine inspiration of the Vedas. I understood you to say (and certainly that is my own idea) that the Vedas were written by Rishis in a state of spiritual illumination and inspiration to which every man may attain who passes by initiation through the several phases of self-conquest and exaltation to the condition of seership and adeptship ……. I must frankly apprize you that you cannot count upon many more Fellows to follow a lead right towards the Orthodox Christian ambuscade from which we have so thankfully escaped ….. What we want to teach these Western people is the ‘Wisdom-Religion,’ so called, of the pre-Vedic and Vedic periods – which is also the very essence of Gautama Buddha’s philosophy (of course, not popular Buddhism). This religion you seem to have taught both in your letters and your books, and I certainly gather from the revered Swami’s defence of his Bhashya against his critics that this is the identical religion he propagates. But this does not agree with the tone of his esteemed letters to me – at least as I have them in the English translation……”

You don’t get to ‘depersonalise’ God any more than you get to ‘personalise’ God. God is God. One cannot appreciate the complexity of a subject as God without fully exploring it. If Swami said it’s 100 names (or some other “personalisation” of God), then you should be thankful of the Knowledge! Denying this would be like saying: “well, I don’t really want to take the time to learn what a parabola is, I will just skip over it.” and then being surprised when you cannot do calculus later on.

The Colonel finds a point in contention with Swami’s “personalising” God yet the Theosophic website today promotes Abrahamic supremacism & neglects the horrible holy wars against Falun Gong, Tibetan Buddhists and ongoing Islamic genocide in India and the world. It opts to replace persecuted religions with “politically correct” versions:

Screen Shot 2017-11-03 at 8.27.48 PM
“secret doctrine”? like wut bro?

It is very clear that Swami did not want equivalences drawn between religions. In trying to equate God to such silly ideas as “Sufism” or Christianity to God-searching or God-consciousness is in bad faith, even if it can be argued to be “well – intentioned”. Intention is less important than results in the domain of religion!

This means you must both posit your hypothesis and validate it. You must also be open to being wrong and later changing your hypothesis. Otherwise you will be stuck reaping the consequences of this bad action until you learn the proper way.

The Theosophical Society Website is Bad Religious Propaganda

This is what the website stands for in the modern day. Seems pretty soyboyish.

Screen Shot 2017-11-03 at 8.27.41 PM
All right well, let’s see what you’ve got?

I posit that you have achieved nothing in these regards, and so are lacking the mechanism by which you could achieve these goals. It is my opinion that you have failed because you have been unwilling to change in the manner one must change before one can receive the teachings.

If we are to have a “universal brotherhood of races”, each race must feel that their distinctiveness is not erased in the process of membership. I doubt you have achieved this in a manner which is not superficial.

The Theosophy Society is not the Truth Religion

Do you dislike “new agers”? Well, you might be interested to learn that they come from the Theosophy Society:

The present-day New Age movement is said to be based to a considerable extent on original Theosophical tenets and ideas. “No single organization or movement has contributed so many components to the New Age Movement as the Theosophical Society. … It has been the major force in the dissemination of occult literature in the West in the twentieth century.”[60]

Other organizations loosely based on Theosophical texts and doctrines include the Agni Yoga, and a group of religions based on Theosophy called the Ascended Master Teachings: the “I AM” ActivityThe Bridge to Freedom and The Summit Lighthouse, which evolved into the Church Universal and Triumphant. These various offshoots dispute the authenticity of their rivals.

pepe detective
mysteries! mysteries everywhere!

How impressive.

I wonder if there’s a connection there.

Swami’s delegate’s statement: “As regards the Arya’s statement about you, we have nothing to say, for we do not remember to have heard Swamiji acknowledging that you yourself knew Yoga Vidya practically.” ought to have caused the movement to dissolve, yet it persists. So it is now clear that its purveyors are not acting in good faith.

Note: if you wish to attain the truth, it must be done by way of debate. If you want to debate, you need to be able to accept criticism / defeat, not recede to a lazy, self-justified laziness.

Thank you


Why People Defend their Abusers

In my youth an associate of mine imparted some ideas after his basic military training in the Canadian Armed Forces. The initiation process was very challenging: many sleepless nights and gruelling training over the course of a summer. At the end, he was successful and was admitted “into the club”. This experience led him to believe that there was a direct correlation  between how brutal the initiation rite is and how much loyalty is inspired in the soldier. His logic was that “no one would want to admit they did a horrific initiation ritual for a bad reason”. The logic is: “the army must be great, or else, why would I have endured such a painful initiation ritual?”. This idea can also be applied to initiations into fraternities / sororities, secret cults and so forth. Rather than accepting the possibility that they have endured/propagated numerous horrors for a bad reason they retroactively justify their suffering through increased loyalty.

Mind Control Slaves

People who have endured lifelong propaganda, be it and Abrahamic faith, materialism, nihilistic atheism, communism etc, will not usually have the strength to leave it. This is because after enough emotional or physical stress, their will is broken. This means they will no longer have the ability to discern truth from fiction and will simply accept everything their masters tell them.

toilet brush lick antifa
Antifa & the Red Army are dangerous goons

One such example is the mentally disturbed “anti-fascist” group. These people have been victimised by propaganda which insists they are “racist” and that being racist is the worst thing possible. This weaponised propaganda eventually breaks their spirit and they are willing to go as far as accepting communism as a means of atoning for their “racism”. This is in spite of the fact that communism has killed over 100 000 000 people in 100 years and has not been shown to decrease racism at all. But the facts don’t matter to the mind control slave. The only thing that matters is continuing their cult rituals (atonement for “racism).

Another example is the longstanding Hollywood pedophile / human sacrifice cult. The only reason Hollywood stars are willing to turn on Weinstein and other perverts is that their own cult powers are severely diminished if they are exposed as not having moral authority. Hollywood is a leftist entity and the power of leftism largely comes from its presumed moral authority (since we all know intellectual authority is absolutely not in the cards for them). If they lose the presumption of moral supremacy, they will also lose their ability create culture. This will render their cult essentially powerless.

The performance of rituals is central to any religion, including secular religions such as atheism, communism, “anarchism” (which is often just another form of communism), even science (the belief that everything can be explained by science). Whether rituals are a net benefit or detriment to society depends on whether the ideology is true or false.

This is why our dictatorship will be banning the promotion of false ideology. It is a cancer on the soul of society.

Compulsive Proselytising

There is a way to determine whether someone has true or false ideology based on how they speak. False ideologues are aggressive and imperialistic. They will not be satisfied until everyone “submits” to their system, voluntarily or not. They will eagerly resort to violence to impose their beliefs on others. True ideologues take a more defensive stance, only becoming aggressive when their way of life is threatened.

Adherents of false ideology can never truly be convinced of the validity of their claims. This is why they must always attempt to convince others to join their faith: they are indirectly trying to convince themselves. This approach is a fallacy of course, just because everyone happens to believe a particular religion does not necessarily make it true. This is most evident in the oft cited cult of democracy. Why would anyone want a democracy? Even if the leaders were benevolent, which they are not, the low-intellect and unproductive members have as much influence as the high-intellect and productive members through voting. In fact, the former group holds greater sway, for they are greater in numbers! Only an ignorant could defend democracy, given the numerous instances of proof that it is an inherently corrupt system.

Why I do not Subscribe to Oppressive Methodologies of Cult Control

kek me you better opinion
I really like this meme

The most loyal members of my cult are those I’ve known since I was younger. They were and still are: my friends. I am not interested in playing mind games in or manipulating my followers to do my bidding. I want them to join and act voluntarily. I know the truth: people are much more effective as allies when they are acting to fulfil their own desires, not when they are paralysed with fear of ostracism.

fully automated luxury gay space communism.jpg

My religion will win the theocratic dictatorship because I, unlike the leaders of rival cults, am able to CREATE culture, rather than just CULTURALLY APPROPRIATE from others for my own ends. I understand science, culture, sociology, psychology & politics because of my religion, not in spite of it.


Thank you


Guide to Political Labels

Let’s have a look at some modern and historically relevant labels. Note that I go by no label except Gay Universal Gaylord (GUG) and that is because I am a Theocratic Supremacist Dictator (which, according to a scumbag I talked to online, makes me worse than a fascist). Note that Gay = Happy.

Meaning of Political Terms (in Chronological Order)

Comrade (popular for a while, unknown origin): A common term in many identitarian movements, used when referring to another member of the same movement. Often associated with communism, due to the shared root of the word.

Anti-fa (1932, 2017): the paid militia of the communist interest. It seems strange that such an interest could rise in this day and age, given all the failures of communism, but it is not surprising to me. Communism promises an “anti-racist” utopia… This would be appealing to a poor unsuspecting youth, having been told they are “evil racists” their whole lives for their (mostly falsified) historical racial record.

It seems unlikely that sadistic glee could precipitate regret.

They (falsely) believe that a “communist revolution” will put an end to the potential of being labeled “racist'” (which they fear). They also fear defying the communists because communists are extremely cruel to apostates. Communism has killed over 100 000 000 people in the last 100 years. That wasn’t for nothing. It was because communist footsoldiers (i.e.: Antifa) are low-intellect & aggressive while their masters are cruel and sadistic. Once they get into political power, there is nothing stopping them from killing anyone they decide is a threat to their system.

Screen Shot 2017-08-20 at 6.49.54 PM.png

MK Ultra (since the 1950s): A mind control program used on US citizens. Has several active “Manchurian Candidate” type figures in modern politics, making the movements inherently dangerous.

Alt Right (2008, 2016*): Although the term “Alt Right” was started by Paul Gottfried in 2008, its definition seemed to change over the course of its usage, since so many people tried to give a personal spin on it. Wikipedia now equates it with White Nationalism whereas CNN defined it as ” a loose collective of right wing trolls, including anarcho-capitalists”. It was an ironically all encompassing definition, given that most rational people reject mainstream conservatism (unless they are benefitting from such) yet so few are willing to wear the label “Alt Right”.

Alt – Left: This term appears to have been coined in 2016 (mainly by facebook shills) to dilute the anti-semitism of Pepe the Frog. Following the violence perpetrated by Anti-fa at the Charlottesville “Unite the Right”, it was popularised as a catch all term for leftists, specifically violent leftist extremists. Many sympathetic to leftism/communism did not like it, because it placed them into the same tent as admittedly doomed to fail violent extremists (who are now attempting to make an alliance with Juggalos).

Thank you

Sociological Archetypes

Although it may not seem like it, there is something out there which is worth living for. That precious thing is what we are building today.

The current ideological system based on false concepts about sexual identity & exalted victimhood. It is nothing short of a violation of Natural Law. Many wish to engender a cult-like status by having an offended-off: whoever gets the most offended is the “Queen”. This is degenerate.

General Natural Law Class System

We have come so far from Truth dictating policy that some believe emotions ought to dictate policy. Whose emotions exactly are more important? How can we tell? Aren’t we all equal (i.e.: shouldn’t our emotions factor into policy not at all)?

Inverting the Natural Order (as by bestowing false authority) has numerous negative consequences. One of such consequences is that, rather than getting the numerous blessings of my wonderful and perfect objective science basis of reality, the existing Order (cult) endures the humiliation of being usurped by myself and my global order of Priests. I can tell you that if you dislike me, then you will probably not like my GUG Priests either. Funnily enough, I actually don’t care about that.

The rival cult may have started these hysterics, but I am ending them. If you don’t like my method, and attempt to reproach me for it, you might just catch me on a bad day and you probably, really, seriously, don’t want that.

crow of judgement.jpg
never talk to me or my babies ever again.

Sample Sociological Archetypes

One of the most precious sciences is social science. Being social animals, we enjoy each other’s company and derive satisfaction both from designing and ascending socio-cultural hierarchies.

In order for people to (start to) learn this knowledge, here is a sample of archetypes of people in the movement.

The Statesman

grandiose, compassionate, emotional, practical, strong inner fire

Screen Shot 2017-08-11 at 10.45.37 PM.png
Left: US President Donald Trump, Right: Christopher Cantwell

Donald Trump and Christopher Cantwell are both Statesman archetypes. Being older and more experienced, Trump is more restrained than the young buck Cantwell. The result of this is that while both are passionate, Trump is more measured/vengeful & Cantwell more impulsive/forgiving. Trump’s ego is also more externalised (evidenced by his numerous commercial successes) while Cantwell’s is more internalised (evidenced by his recent meteoric rise in knowledge / rhetorical efficacy).

The Memer / Dreamer

enjoys solitude, introspective, complex, creative, anguished

Not necessarily a content creator, but certainly an avid & discerning consumer, this archetype is often lost in the world of ideas. They have the potential to access higher teachings through their imaginations, but must be careful not to get carried away in flights of whimsey. While useful, their perfectionism can cause inaction & neurosis.

Most of my assembly fits this archetype.

wanna start a cult oyster
something like that


The Pillar

contemplative, inhibited, caring, measured, strong, committed

Though not a big talker, the Pillar archetype listens and internalises very well. Their emotions run deeper than average. They are a loyal companion and dedicated friend.

me smiling in bedroom
I am beyond many archetype systems, but not all.


These archetypes are a starting point for self-understanding (within our cultural context). The goal is not to limit ourselves to any particular archetype or system, but rather to study all archetype systems. This is how we can know ourself, independent of archetype systems.

Thank you




Popular Myths Debunked

Reincarnation isn’t real if I don’t believe in it

Nature is manifold cyclic. Every entity undergoes rebirth. Your desire to not be reborn is insufficient to prevent you being reborn and no amount of wishful thinking, praying, fanaticism, denial is going to change that fact. You’re stuck here to face the consequences of all your actions until you reach liberation (not too likely at this point, especially if we lose the info-war).

reincarnation pepe
Don’t wait until you die to accept the Truth

The Central Banks will always be there

In the 400 years or so that these institutions have existed, we have seen countless wars, deaths, famine and genocide. There is no reason to continue on with these institutions and we’ll be removing them as quickly as humanly possible. Given that humans have been bartering using money for a very long time, we don’t see that institution going away anytime soon, but we can easily do away with fiat/usury based money.

fractal wrongness.png
saying something is true doesn’t make it true

Marijuana/Hemp ought to be Illegal

It’s not realistic to make a plant illegal. Historically it has been used as medicine and has already been shown to help with several conditions. The only reason it is illegal now is so that the pharmaceutical industry can operate without competition. There is no reason for this plant to be illegal. Anyone telling you otherwise is either ignorant or benefitting from the illegitimate health care psychotropic industry.

It’s a fucking plant dipshit. What are you going to make illegal next? Oxygen? Carbon dioxide?

Traveling to and colonising other planets is likely

It really isn’t. I don’t even think the Moon landing was real at this point. Anyone dreaming about colonising other planets would do well to focus on improving circumstances here on Earth through wisdom and introspection, not lying to cover up a legacy of failed conquests and violence against native people.

Worry about Planet Earth first, morons.

Thank you

State Enforced Morality

“The mark of a leader is adherence to their own standards”

~Jen Scharf

Is Morality Objective?

It is clear to me that IF morality exists, THEN it is objective. If it is subjective, then it does not exist (in a meaningful/scientific way). Morality is the individual imparting minimal harm. If we are to prevent people from being able to harm others, we have to understand the origin (cause) of that which causes harm.

Finding these causes is a nontrivial task. I think it’s pretty clear that high moral standards are to the greatest benefit of the society. It’s also obvious that society is way off the path of how it ought to be going.

cow with hole in stomach
Barbaric Animal Treatment

Not everyone is able to sense the agony of animals, but suffering exists whether or not we acknowledge it. Over time, this has consequences for all sentient beings because we are all part of the same cosmic whole. It is clear to us now that along with fiat currency, positive human rights are one of the primary causes of corruption. The only legitimate state-enforced human rights are negative.

This is why Government should only exist to enforce the prevention of harm.

What constitutes “harm” is a nontrivial matter. This is why society must have 2 critical strata: a Priest class (to decide what constitutes harm) and a Warrior class (to enforce the will of the Priest class). Right now, the Merchant class decides the direction of society, so it is unsurprising that we have wars for profit, government-sponsored child sex trafficking rings, people being treated like cattle and widespread genital mutilation.

Screen Shot 2017-07-27 at 11.13.42 PM

It’s time to stop impostors. The only people that can do that are those that have inborn morality and judgement. Because I am able to recognise this trait in people, I can lead the transition from the false theocratic dictatorship using my real theocratic dictatorship to take over the duties formerly performed by this impostor class. My following consists of highly competent, creative, independent and intelligent people from across all walks of life and levels of education.

I won’t be stopping until I get satisfaction and upon my instatement, I will be getting justice against those who attempted to impede me. I am the rightful heir to the Theocratic Dictatorship and am more than happy to share that honour with any other rightful heirs. Therefore, there exists no logical argument against this proposition.

It’s time for society to be steered by objective morality again, not greed-based degeneracy.

Things will only get worse if you fail to comply with the Theocratic Dictatorship. 

Thank you.

central banks
400 years, countless loss of life, ruin and misery