Religious Law – 1

Here are some ideas for our future Natural Law based Governance system. It represents a philosophical departure from the reigning orthodoxy in that: there will be no more elections, instead individuals will be allowed to join our collective on the basis of merit. There will be no fiat banking, since we will oversee the Central Banks returning to a tangible standard. Generally there will be restrictions on behaviour, so that superior people can properly fulfil their duties as the Priest Class: teaching and guiding those less evolved.

Ban on the Promotion of False Ideology

All popular ideologies will be expounded in debate. Those ideologies found to be inconsistent with or antagonistic towards Natural Law will be banned from public discourse. This ban will be punishable by increasing measures, beginning with public humiliation.

Screen Shot 2017-06-08 at 5.46.32 PM
It’s “satire”, bro.

Active Promotion of Truth Ideology

Time-honoured, scientifically validated traditions will be promoted. Public debate (by accepted persons) as to what constitutes false ideology will take place. I personally wish we could make all natural drugs legal, but also realise that we are facing an epidemic of legal drugs which is far more severe than all but the most extreme illegal drugs. Thus my current compromise is a ban on non-natural drugs, starting with anti-depressants and other psychotropics with no proven benefit.

Not Capitalism. Certainly NOT Communism.

Capitalism is problematic because not all markets can be managed via the profit motive. Communism has been disproven so many times, it doesn’t even warrant an explanation. Shut up about communism.

luxury communism
I cannot explain this joke to you. But I can confirm that communism won’t recover from it.

We must remember 2 things: wanting to make money / acquire property is a human desire, it cannot be successfully enforced by law. Any attempts to enshrine “capitalism” into law are bound to fail (and likely be used to extortive ends). Communism is the same: people gather into groups by their preferences and live as communities. You cannot enforce this through central government.

What can be the role of central government?

Voluntary contracts enforcement, education propaganda, military protection. I regret to say that additionally I recommend nationalising the Monsanto Corporation to prevent any major threat to the food supply as well as decelerate the use of poisonous chemicals (RoundUp) in food production.

Generally, we acknowledge the problems of incentivising the profit motive in the domains of

  • Health & Medicine (treating problems rather than finding cures)
  • Education (lying about reality for over 100 years in order to turn people into slavelike pinheads)
  • Defence (wars for profit)
  • Food production (corporate food producers lobbying to increase the amount of toxins legally allowed in food rather than growing food organically)

This cannot be allowed to continue. That said, I am not interested in policing false laws, so expect that to be drastically reduced in favour of creating a society that doesn’t make me want to remain in the basement at all times.

Think of it like a rival gang takeover

Sure, we aren’t perfect, but our competitor is pure evil! I am the decider as to who makes decisions in my cult/religion/gang/government. Ideologically, we all want to protect innocents from harm.

hillary sex cult
The rival cult aren’t nice people.

My main concerns are: removing the shadow government, dealing with the nuclear disaster at Fukushima, installing Natural Law Government, never EVER having to have an argument with someone in the rival cult again, since no one will care about false religions after they stop being funded by Central Banks. Moreover, I have provided a replacement science religion to help with adjusting to our legal / social / economic system.

Or, you can have Islamic Sharia, I guess. Choose wisely.

Thank you.

Below are the properties we can realistically acquire in terms of influence. Note that I am from the Quebec region and love it dearly and so would like to preserve the French heritage there, and have a strong basis of Truth Religion Education in the region, since the Periodic Table looks like a Quantum Mechanical Vagina. I didn’t put a name for Africa since I knew no matter what I put, it would likely cause offence, and this is not what I want to do (asides from the requisite offence Truth bears; this cannot be avoided). Pic inspired by this. It’s meant to be fun. 

earthicefreemask2 jp

People who tell you to avoid people are probably shills.

I am very happy when anyone calls attention to double standards / bigotry and other violations of Natural Law. Sadly, we have the problem of people believing they have reached an objective assessment of reality subsequently feeling they are qualified to be Theocratic Supremacist Dictators (in other words: impartial judges of reality). Specifically, I am referring to the people at this website, who have made the sizeable error of slandering me personally. Like most controlled opposition websites, it contains 95% good material and 5% utter horseshit. I will now expound my position.

Caveat lector!

Why is this site controlled opposition?

Well, first of all, they promote flat earth theory, a paid shilling campaign SO OBVIOUS, it ought to be laughed out of any respectable society (were our society not already so degenerate, it never would have gained any traction). I can disprove FE in two ways without even really trying:

  1. If Earth were flat, so too would all the other Planets be (since we all occupy the same physical space, we are subject to the same physical laws) and thus we would expect oblong obscurations of the planets along their phases, consistent with flat planets, which of course, we do not:
    If it was a disk, it would not likely create a circular shadow, but rather an oblong one. source.

    anyone promoting FE is a complete idiot. source.
  2. The greatest (unfettered, created) Entropy shape in R3 is a sphere (see: bubbles, balloons, moeraki boulders, rolled-up cookie dough, unfettered electrons…). I even took the time to prove it here. There is NO evidence to support flat earth. All evidence supports that it’s a paid shill campaign to discredit the Truther movement (not going to happen. bc reasons).

Like seriously, give me a break. You can’t even spell and you want to comment on astrophysics? Please stick to your domain of expertise (cookie recipes maybe?).

Screen Shot 2017-05-29 at 7.24.43 PM
It’s “an”. Also, maybe take a course on grammar. You have 300% too many commas.

The FE article is heavy on emotional appeals and light on scientific evidence. It begs the question: was this website started with the unique goal of de-legitimising the so-called “white nationalist” movement? If this is the case, these people ought to be ashamed of themselves. If they are just stupid idiots (as I believe to be the case since I prefer to give people the benefit of the doubt), I strongly suggest they IMMEDIATELY SUBMIT TO MY DIVINE LAW, which can be called “White Sharia” but also has many other names (names are not as important as actions, a lesson many people seem reticent to accept).

Censorship is not the answer

I would never recommend to “stay away from these freaks” to ANY of my followers, as it is an insult to their intelligence. People should consider all sources and make the best decision, given the evidence.

Nonstop, baseless hatred => shill

I didn’t even have to scroll past the last 24 hours to find a series of hateful tweets.

Screen Shot 2017-05-29 at 6.56.05 PM
…uh…k?

One thing I’ve noticed is that shills are very eager to equate left-wing extremism (i.e.: feminism, marxism, communism) to other forms of extremism. This is a logical fallacy known as a ‘false equivalence’. It’s akin to saying that shit and chocolate ice cream are the same since they are both brown. Well, not really. While all forms of extremism share some attributes, only a fool (or double agent) would equate the Alt-Right to feminism (in any manner).

I laugh when I see people commenting on “White Sharia” while it’s progenitor deliberately left the details vague. At this point, this meme is less about it’s particular information content (which we should be so lucky as to have the divine guidance of a true master of) and more of a projection of the mental state of the advocate. In other words, if you are only promoting rape gangs through this meme, you should probably take a step back and consider whether you are truly qualified for the role of theocratic dictator.

She has a deranged obsession with Andrew Anglin

How is this not slander, exactly? I also have it on good authority that she is currently sexually harassing him (i.e.: offering to be his “mommy” – what a disgusting person). Might I suggest: getting a life?

Who is our enemy exactly?

It appears as though the “establishment” has existed for as long as Central Banks. This is close to 400 years. Thus the most reasonable conclusion I can draw is that the existing power structure funds both sides of all conflicts (because they are not real, but rather imagined conflicts). This is what is meant by “controlled opposition”: entities who purport as being unbiased truth-tellers, but in actuality are reading from a pre-determined script.

In order to be effective, disinformation propaganda must be mostly true (to lure people in; since people love the Truth) but ultimately false in that it prevents any real change from happening. And by real change I mean: myself and my cult installed as Theocratic Dictators of the World and appointed as sole controllers of the Central Banks. On this there can be NO DEBATE. The root of modern day problems are Central Banks. The remainder are derivative problems. I posit such would all but disappear without constant funding from Central Banks. That which they fund would not exist without fiat money and this is certainly worthy of contemplation.

central banks.jpeg
I’m not stuck here with you. You’re stuck here with ME!

It is my opinion that this blog exists to discourage advocates of self-governance, because the person representing it is aggressive and divisive: she is not holding herself to the highest standards of Truth. While I would like nothing more than to welcome women into the highest ranks of my Church, I will NEVER have affirmative action hires in my meritocracy. That is not the way of Natural Law.

A comment on Sinead’s accusations that I am a Jew

I am very proud of my heritage which includes German communalists from Romania, who sadly had their modest farming community stolen from them by communist gypsy degenerates in the 1950s (the reason my father’s family immigrated to Montreal) and Irish peasants (as well as some Bishops, my grandmother assured me). I do not have any Jewish blood.

That said, I implore you to focus primarily on the ACTIONS of people and secondarily on their RACIAL/RELIGIOUS background. This is the only way to gain a truthful assessment of the present-day circumstances and (perhaps more importantly): a realistic solution.

Thank you.

Q & A (Clarifications)

Q: I don’t really get it. So you’re an anarchist?

A: Philosophically, I accept the some ideologies as not entirely inconsistent with reality. Anarchy is one of those ideologies but I am a Theocratic Supremacist and I submit to the Divine Law of the Universe.

Q: What do you do if you overthrow the current rulers but don’t replace them, leaving a power vacuum?

A: I will institute a Theocratic Supremacist Dictatorship which will dictate the realm of possible action of subversive forces based on time-honoured traditions, technological progress and particular ethnicities/cultures/peoples.

Q: What is wrong with a party that is democratic in decision-making but firm in decisions so long as there are not alien class influences?

A: Generally, the popular view is not always accurate and thus Democracy is not scientifically validated, although it’s been around for some time. Specifically, the money cult funds campaigns based on results and enables people to be dishonest. Only a communal consensus, led by nothing short of the Divine Will itself, can rightly guide the masses forward.

Q: How do you objectively make the world better and get through all the capitalist propaganda to reach people?

A: Generally, I institute a Theocratic Dictatorship which teaches the Truth that the lower classes must be subjugated to the higher classes. Specifically, I ban all non Priests from the duties of the Priest class, which removes the profit motive for pursuits that ought not have a profit motive (psychology, teaching and many more).

True propaganda will always drown out false propaganda so long as it is not suppressed.

Radical ideas caught fire in a short time during the American Revolution. We need to consider all ideas. I don’t quite fathom the full extent of what you write about West ideas. We need ideas that work, wherever they come from.

Thank you for your consideration and I hope you will join my Priest Order.

What is Natural Law?

Note: This is my opinion. I am always open to debating all points, but such must be done on a logical, rational basis and ideally using precise terms. Therefore please omit all communist / social justice terminology unless you’d like me to place your opinion into the garbage, where it belongs.

Democracy will never serve the best interests of the people

Although many attempt to spit shine the turd of democracy as though it were some holy grail of civic governance, I forcefully reject it. This is because the average person does not have the intellect required to vote the best representative into power. Moreover, the saturation of money into the hands of a select group of child raping, brain eating psychopaths has created a situation which all but excludes anyone who isn’t a stone cold psychopath with no principles from any position of political power. The voting public then gets to choose which parasite will feast on the rotting carcass of their once great society. It’s no small wonder so few people vote.

What to replace “Democracy” with?

We shall return to the old ways of a high council of learned people (priests) making all decisions and handing down their judgements once said council reaches a communal consensus. Since all Natural Law tennets can be justified using logic, there is no reason for the community to disagree on any law. In fact, disagreements on the implementation of Natural Law are grounds for a complete usurpation of the existing order, as I have already accomplished in the domains of quantum physics, chemisry, psychology and propaganda (‘memetics’) and will continue to do for the remaining derivative fields of sociology, cultural programming, economics and politics.

But Jen, I don’t want to submit to your Theocratic Supremacist Dictatorship *boo hoo*

You are advised to speak to the numerous scientists (cryentists) whomst’ve been ousted from their (undeserved) positions of honour by my proof of the microcanonical Measurement Limit (I proved there are only 118 elements in the Periodic Table, ruining the careers of every particle & experimental physicist. I gave them a chance to co-publish my results, they refused, now they are barred from entry to my order). Do not be so stupid as they were to deny my supremacy.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
You sound dumb to deny me TBH

Natural Law: Theoretically Simple, Implementally Complex

It is certainly not clear how to implement the Natural Law system: I.E.: the system for which deviation from objectively optimized reality is minimized. This is because the optimal conditions are unique to peoples themselves.

It is my opinion that the best place to start is that we seek to do minimal harm, and seek to inflict maximal harm on those impeding our ability to do minimal harm. Since the second condition is linearly dependent on the first, our system of government becomes a living science: constantly debated and adapted to best serve the needs of the times and peoples submitted to its rule. That’s why I need others to contribute their ideas so that we can guarantee our system is truly maximally voluntary.

Here is a video I made exploring this idea.

Thank you

Economic & Legal Engineering I

Introduction

The subjects of law and economics have always fascinated me. However, due to my promise to find the root of knowledge, I have been largely confined to the subjects of Cause and Effect (together: causality) specifically how they apply to Quantum Fields (so as to provide evidence for my hypothesis of Vedic Supremacy, divined to me at age 4) up until this point. Now that I have solved all problems of causality, giving the maximally precise solution to the Measurement Problem of Quantum Mechanics, I have decided to pursue derivative subjects, my opinions on which I shall expound below.

Law

Having worked in law enforcement as a scientist for seven years, I can safely say that the majority of people serving the role of warrior (police, military infantry, field agents) are good people. I can also say that most laws are evil in that they violate Natural Law. This mismatch creates a ‘slow drip’ of incremental corruption. Unsavoury characters rise to power becasue they are willing to enforce immoral laws while the esteem of good people is slowly corroded until they are fully demoralized.

Although I cannot prove this all to be intentional subversion, it is clear to me (and should be to you too) that the primary goal of most laws is NOT the protection of the weak nor the support of the righteous, but rather the continued supremacy of the ruling orthodoxy (that which emanates from the Central Banks and has existed intact and expanding for over two hundred years). These views ought to be obvious to the discerning observer, so we might be inclined to wonder why this opinion is not more widespread.

Why are all the good fields chock full of subversive shit munchers?

The evidence supports that the ruling orthodoxy dispatches its agents to desecrate the reputation of viable ideologies/philosophies/religions. For instance, why is ‘Yoga’ taught predominantly by superficial simpleton females? Why are ‘autists’ denigrated? Why are there SO many imbeciles online trying to derail conversations that might actually resolve longstanding societal issues?

The answer is simple: the current orthodoxy has no authority to govern. It is very likely that they already know this, which explains their constant attempts at subterfuge. They use their infinite money (made available through fiat banking) to cover up their misdeeds and persecute anyone who tells the truth about them. Based on my observations, negotiation is largely impossible and they will need to be removed by force.

bird-in-helicopter
Non-violently, of course.

Trust me, a Theocratic Supremacist Dictatorship was not my original plan, rather my last ditch effort

Given that the goal of subversives is to protect the child rape demon worshipping cult (whether they are consciously supporting them or merely ‘useful idiots’ is of no consquence to me, since the outcome is the same), I have no interest in engaging with them. My approach is to vet everyone personally and only to accord authority to my own Proxies, to the exclusion of all others. With that, I joyously invite you to apply to join my Priest Order if you are an inquisitive, sensitive and caring person. Otherwise, I strongly caution you to cease emulating the Priest Class, for you stand in violation of Natural Law, and I simply will not tolerate this.

Among others, the duties of the Priest class include teaching, healing, psychology, social and economic engineering and selection of political delegates (that’s right, in the future all politicians will be ‘shills’ of the Church of Entropy). Who decides who is qualified for such? Myself and my Priests.

I endorse Christopher Cantwell for Fascist Dictator

If you’d like to see the sort of person I endorse for the delegated authority of political leader, please see Christopher Cantwell of The Radical Agenda. I endorse him because he has a good heart, wishes to protect the innocent, cares about Natural Law and civic governance, is ideologically aligned with libertarianism (the good kind, not the subversive goof kind) and (as far as I can tell) is able to be persuaded by logic (even though he did one time say women shouldn’t be involved in politics, I am willing to overlook that, since I plan to exclude anyone not vetted by my organization from politics. That’s pretty much every woman. And every man for that matter).

Like all endorsements emanating from the Church of Entropy, it is subject to continued adherence to the principles of Natural Law governance and submission to the Knowledge as expounded in the unfalsifiable tenets of my Fourfold Action Model, that is {Gravity, Uncertainty, Electricity, Entropy}.

Looking forward to ruling the planet with you,

Jen

Anarcho-Go-F**k-Yourself-ism

You can’t fight Natural Law. You just can’t. Well, you can, but it’s really hard and ultimately, unnatural systems will thus be relatively: unstable. This is a fact of life. I am not going to deviate from my postulates which I have stated many times but which can be reduced to:

  • Subjugation of the National Governments to my Theocratic Dictatorship
  • Subjugation of regional Warrior classes to the National Governments
  • Subjugation of the Mercantile and Servant classes to same
  • Removal of usury banking
  • Retribution for war profiteering
  • Self Governance for all special interest groups (where possible)
  • Compassionate Governance (where impossible)

Do not attempt to change the course of my path, you will fail. All you can aspire to is to ascend to the ruling class of your special interest group. Only then can you know the true honour of what it means to be capable of self governance. If you fear it too much, you are unprepared for the task. If you do not fear it enough, it will engulf you as a whole. That is why we always rely on the guidance of spiritual masters: learned in the domains we have outlined.

All knowledge in the West derives from my system. It is now clear that we need people to specialize in each domain as we de-escalate the orthodoxy of the false Priest class: offering a viable alternative to the current unsustainable system.

church-priest-hierarchy