People who tell you to avoid people are probably shills.

I am very happy when anyone calls attention to double standards / bigotry and other violations of Natural Law. Sadly, we have the problem of people believing they have reached an objective assessment of reality subsequently feeling they are qualified to be Theocratic Supremacist Dictators (in other words: impartial judges of reality). Specifically, I am referring to the people at this website, who have made the sizeable error of slandering me personally. Like most controlled opposition websites, it contains 95% good material and 5% utter horseshit. I will now expound my position.

Caveat lector!

Why is this site controlled opposition?

Well, first of all, they promote flat earth theory, a paid shilling campaign SO OBVIOUS, it ought to be laughed out of any respectable society (were our society not already so degenerate, it never would have gained any traction). I can disprove FE in two ways without even really trying:

  1. If Earth were flat, so too would all the other Planets be (since we all occupy the same physical space, we are subject to the same physical laws) and thus we would expect oblong obscurations of the planets along their phases, consistent with flat planets, which of course, we do not:
    If it was a disk, it would not likely create a circular shadow, but rather an oblong one. source.

    anyone promoting FE is a complete idiot. source.
  2. The greatest (unfettered, created) Entropy shape in R3 is a sphere (see: bubbles, balloons, moeraki boulders, rolled-up cookie dough, unfettered electrons…). I even took the time to prove it here. There is NO evidence to support flat earth. All evidence supports that it’s a paid shill campaign to discredit the Truther movement (not going to happen. bc reasons).

Like seriously, give me a break. You can’t even spell and you want to comment on astrophysics? Please stick to your domain of expertise (cookie recipes maybe?).

Screen Shot 2017-05-29 at 7.24.43 PM
It’s “an”. Also, maybe take a course on grammar. You have 300% too many commas.

The FE article is heavy on emotional appeals and light on scientific evidence. It begs the question: was this website started with the unique goal of de-legitimising the so-called “white nationalist” movement? If this is the case, these people ought to be ashamed of themselves. If they are just stupid idiots (as I believe to be the case since I prefer to give people the benefit of the doubt), I strongly suggest they IMMEDIATELY SUBMIT TO MY DIVINE LAW, which can be called “White Sharia” but also has many other names (names are not as important as actions, a lesson many people seem reticent to accept).

Censorship is not the answer

I would never recommend to “stay away from these freaks” to ANY of my followers, as it is an insult to their intelligence. People should consider all sources and make the best decision, given the evidence.

Nonstop, baseless hatred => shill

I didn’t even have to scroll past the last 24 hours to find a series of hateful tweets.

Screen Shot 2017-05-29 at 6.56.05 PM

One thing I’ve noticed is that shills are very eager to equate left-wing extremism (i.e.: feminism, marxism, communism) to other forms of extremism. This is a logical fallacy known as a ‘false equivalence’. It’s akin to saying that shit and chocolate ice cream are the same since they are both brown. Well, not really. While all forms of extremism share some attributes, only a fool (or double agent) would equate the Alt-Right to feminism (in any manner).

I laugh when I see people commenting on “White Sharia” while it’s progenitor deliberately left the details vague. At this point, this meme is less about it’s particular information content (which we should be so lucky as to have the divine guidance of a true master of) and more of a projection of the mental state of the advocate. In other words, if you are only promoting rape gangs through this meme, you should probably take a step back and consider whether you are truly qualified for the role of theocratic dictator.

She has a deranged obsession with Andrew Anglin

How is this not slander, exactly? I also have it on good authority that she is currently sexually harassing him (i.e.: offering to be his “mommy” – what a disgusting person). Might I suggest: getting a life?

Who is our enemy exactly?

It appears as though the “establishment” has existed for as long as Central Banks. This is close to 400 years. Thus the most reasonable conclusion I can draw is that the existing power structure funds both sides of all conflicts (because they are not real, but rather imagined conflicts). This is what is meant by “controlled opposition”: entities who purport as being unbiased truth-tellers, but in actuality are reading from a pre-determined script.

In order to be effective, disinformation propaganda must be mostly true (to lure people in; since people love the Truth) but ultimately false in that it prevents any real change from happening. And by real change I mean: myself and my cult installed as Theocratic Dictators of the World and appointed as sole controllers of the Central Banks. On this there can be NO DEBATE. The root of modern day problems are Central Banks. The remainder are derivative problems. I posit such would all but disappear without constant funding from Central Banks. That which they fund would not exist without fiat money and this is certainly worthy of contemplation.

central banks.jpeg
I’m not stuck here with you. You’re stuck here with ME!

It is my opinion that this blog exists to discourage advocates of self-governance, because the person representing it is aggressive and divisive: she is not holding herself to the highest standards of Truth. While I would like nothing more than to welcome women into the highest ranks of my Church, I will NEVER have affirmative action hires in my meritocracy. That is not the way of Natural Law.

A comment on Sinead’s accusations that I am a Jew

I am very proud of my heritage which includes German communalists from Romania, who sadly had their modest farming community stolen from them by communist gypsy degenerates in the 1950s (the reason my father’s family immigrated to Montreal) and Irish peasants (as well as some Bishops, my grandmother assured me). I do not have any Jewish blood.

That said, I implore you to focus primarily on the ACTIONS of people and secondarily on their RACIAL/RELIGIOUS background. This is the only way to gain a truthful assessment of the present-day circumstances and (perhaps more importantly): a realistic solution.

Thank you.