Popular Science Hoaxes

True Knowledge

I was born with what I consider to be True Knowledge. (*This is not to say that it is Complete Knowledge). Therefore, whenever I was shown teachings that were inconsistent with this true knowledge, I had a “bad feeling”. It probably seems odd to do science on the basis of emotion, but we all have our faith systems, and that is part of mine.

no brakes on the feel train

I, like everyone else, have my own opinions: based on faith & evidence. I am willing to change my position on them, but not without conclusive evidence. Moreover, in the domain of science, multiple answers can solve a problem and they can all be correct. We can also have debate as to which system best parametrizes a phenomenon. For instance, my Fourfold Action Model parametrizes spacetime with a cardinality of 4 (there are only 4 actions in my model: Gravity, Uncertainty, Electricity, Entropy) over 4 orders of magnitude. Thus, someone could conceivably reparametrize causality using different actions and still* have a correct system.

There are infinitely many solutions for a unified field model and I have attempted to find the one of lowest cardinality (with the least number of actions). This is because it’s easier to understand 4 concepts than 5 (or more). This potential for subtle debate does not however extend to demonstrably false ideologies/models. These should be abandoned, for they create cognitive dissonance, which severely hampers one’s ability to assimilate new concepts (this is why I am having an easier time teaching teenagers and people who’ve never studied science than actual “scientists”).

There are no singularities

From Wikipedia:

Screen Shot 2017-04-12 at 11.35.48 AM

This is another way of saying “suspend your disbelief” while mapping concepts. This is known by another name in psychology: cognitive dissonance. Such cultists must use a large amount of mental energy to maintain the set of fundamental incompatible beliefs, so you can understand why I never accepted any theories featuring singularities! (most of them).

“Soft” sciences use sociological cognitive dissonance (i.e.: feminism, communism, hate speech laws etc.) to condition the mind. Hard sciences use logical cognitive dissonance singularities. Such create a stubbornness which renders the cultist unable to think outside of the parameters of his own training. We must emphasize: this is a difficult concept to address. It goes to the heart of conditioning giving the logical conclusion that the body is the minimal “restrictive” parameter. Mental concepts are all restrictions: serving to delineate one concept from another. This cannot be avoided. The question reduces to: which is the optimized parametrization system. I cannot transcend this question, I can only show you my result (proven to be optimized for the configuration space of physical science). This does not mean I transcend religions either, simply that religion can now be summarized as a sociocultural ideology and examined within that ontology. Nothing more. Nothing less.

Do not promote singularities

Like, give me a break. Never talk to me: Kurzweil, unless it’s to apologize.

My model parametrizes spacetime with no need for singularities. It makes all predictions and is great.

How to Scientifically Validate My Claim

Social Sciences

People are taught not to be able to distinguish between a tautology (something that is always true, such as “there is an invisible pony here”) and a predictive hypothesis (such as: my model). While tautologies are useless, predictive hypotheses are how we live. Even words are

Tell someone that reincarnation is unfalsifiable. They will tell you that an unfalsifiable hypothesis isn’t science. (You can thank the piece of garbage Karl Popper for that). Then ask them if Gravity is falsifiable & whether it’s science! Then watch them have cognitive dissonance and forget the whole thing tomorrow!


Physical Sciences

Ask literally anyone about physics. The current unified field theory has 2 false forces (weak and strong nuclear forces). They are false in that they make no predictions, only give descriptions. Science is supposed to make thinking easier by making predictions. It’s not supposed to be used to not confuse people with singularities, like the Big Bang! The entire cosmology du jour rests upon a singularity, proven to cause cognitive dissonance. They are making the hardest subject even impossible! It’s not even worth

Screen Shot 2017-04-12 at 12.22.59 PM

It’s like feminism infected the base node of physics: ick!

That show is really garbage. And I’m not just saying that because everyone likens me to Sheldon. It’s because it paints smart and sensitive people as being uncool, and that’s not cool.

Thank you.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s