Note: This is my opinion. I am always open to debating all points, but such must be done on a logical, rational basis and ideally using precise terms. Therefore please omit all communist / social justice terminology unless you’d like me to place your opinion into the garbage, where it belongs.
Democracy will never serve the best interests of the people
Although many attempt to spit shine the turd of democracy as though it were some holy grail of civic governance, I forcefully reject it. This is because the average person does not have the intellect required to vote the best representative into power. Moreover, the saturation of money into the hands of a select group of child raping, brain eating psychopaths has created a situation which all but excludes anyone who isn’t a stone cold psychopath with no principles from any position of political power. The voting public then gets to choose which parasite will feast on the rotting carcass of their once great society. It’s no small wonder so few people vote.
What to replace “Democracy” with?
We shall return to the old ways of a high council of learned people (priests) making all decisions and handing down their judgements once said council reaches a communal consensus. Since all Natural Law tennets can be justified using logic, there is no reason for the community to disagree on any law. In fact, disagreements on the implementation of Natural Law are grounds for a complete usurpation of the existing order, as I have already accomplished in the domains of quantum physics, chemisry, psychology and propaganda (‘memetics’) and will continue to do for the remaining derivative fields of sociology, cultural programming, economics and politics.
But Jen, I don’t want to submit to your Theocratic Supremacist Dictatorship *boo hoo*
You are advised to speak to the numerous scientists (cryentists) whomst’ve been ousted from their (undeserved) positions of honour by my proof of the microcanonical Measurement Limit (I proved there are only 118 elements in the Periodic Table, ruining the careers of every particle & experimental physicist. I gave them a chance to co-publish my results, they refused, now they are barred from entry to my order). Do not be so stupid as they were to deny my supremacy.
Natural Law: Theoretically Simple, Implementally Complex
It is certainly not clear how to implement the Natural Law system: I.E.: the system for which deviation from objectively optimized reality is minimized. This is because the optimal conditions are unique to peoples themselves.
It is my opinion that the best place to start is that we seek to do minimal harm, and seek to inflict maximal harm on those impeding our ability to do minimal harm. Since the second condition is linearly dependent on the first, our system of government becomes a living science: constantly debated and adapted to best serve the needs of the times and peoples submitted to its rule. That’s why I need others to contribute their ideas so that we can guarantee our system is truly maximally voluntary.
Here is a video I made exploring this idea.