This is a continuation of this.

#### Disclaimer

These are my opinions.

#### Definitions

Zeroth waveform configuration space: atomic nucleus = {proton, neutron}

First waveform configuration space: atomic radius = {proton, electron}

#### Introduction

Many people are having a hard time understanding the Periodic Table. It took me several months as well, and I only connected the shape to microcanonical “space” & “time” after much contemplation: there was simply nothing else they could be.

There are only so many unknown variables.

The challenge is in perceiving the totality of the nested structure and also the particular reactions taking place within it. The trick is to recall that no matter how much we “zoom in” on reality, there are 3 space and 1 time dimensions. It’s true on the scale of the universe right down to the scale of a single atom. Thus we can conclude that: Spacetime cardinality (number of independent dimensions (=4)) is preserved under [the] fractal [operator] (zooming in arbitrarily).

A single atom thus represents a particular quantum number within the microcanonical set or: “Periodic Table” (below). A particular atom’s reactions are consequent wholly to its positioning relative this greater fractal shape: the set of all sets of possible waveform stable states (this will be explored in my book).

This is the geometric shape of the Periodic Table: consequent to the {electron, proton} duality. The stable states are the Noble Gases, equal to a full electron complement for a particular heptant (above). (heptant = any of the seven rows of the Periodic Table).

#### Fractal Spiral Geometry

On the finest scale, each micro-canonical “dimension” is nested within subsequent dimensions. As micro-space and micro-time are *entangled*, the Periodic Table has a structure which is *not independent of itself*.

#### Chemical and Nuclear Reactivity

We will see in my book that the microcanonical spacetime cardinality (4) also explains nuclear reactivity. The microcanonical harmonics (heptants delineated by the black oscillating wave) are illlustrated below. The vertical axis represents the number of neutrons and horizontal is protons.

An isotope’s proximity to the (zeroth configuration space) stable states predicts its (nuclear) reactivity (a.k.a.: radioactivity). Specifically, the further a species is from the central (darker) line, the more radioactive it is. By contrast, an element’s proximity to a (first configuration space) stable state (“Noble Gases”) predicts its (chemical) reactivity. The closer a species is to a Noble Gas, the more reactive it is.

We postulate that this inverse relationship stems from the canonical conjugation (CC) of the attributes of the {proton, electron} and {proton, neutron} waveform pairs. Namely, the waveforms possess the qualities of

Ψ Neutron: {dense, uncharged, heavy}

Ψ Proton: {dense, charged, heavy}

Ψ Electron: {diffuse, charged, light}

We can explicitly see that while individual waveform pairs share certain attributes, several are polar opposites. These connections will be further explored in my book.

Since both contain the proton, the pair sets of the zeroth ({Ψn, Ψp}) and first ({Ψe, Ψp}) waveform configuration spaces cannot be 100% independent. But they are also maximally independent. For an example of independence: trends in reactivity are perpendicular and complementary. For an example of dependence, nuclear properties of elements are predicted *both* by their zeroth and first configuration space waveform numbers. This will also be explored in my book: I present a model of universal energetic exchange free of any singularity.

#### What is Energy? (Pet Peeve #1)

<rant> Pretty much anytime someone says the word “Energy”, I get annoyed. This is because energy is the universal “currency”: all the universe can be imagined as different manifestations of such. Obviously, there aren’t many similarities between the mass-energy of a black hole (unobservable) and the energetic potential contained in light (wholly unmanifest). In fact, these phenomena are so different that they are *only* connected via Energy.

Thus to say “all is Energy” is meaningless: it makes no predictions because it discerns no hypotheses. It reminds me of people who use words like “Tantric” and “Physics” to bolster their pathetic attempts at cultural contribution. Don’t make the mistake of thinking you can bullshit your way through rigorous disciplines, it only angers those of us who have spent our whole lives pursuing knowledge and truth! </rant>

When dealing specifically with massive waveforms, Energy is the potential function [of mass]. This is true inside the manifest realm, and also *between* the unmanifest and manifest realms. In the latter case, as Energy penetrates the barrier between the unmanifest and manifest (as an atom is “created”), [unmanifest] energy is literally *manifesting* the qualities of length and momentum. Thus once an atom exists, it possesses qualities both unmanifest (position & momentum are in potential) and manifest (existing within a particular geometric radius).

#### The Microcanonical Spacetime Event (if you’ve made it this far, you’re math-core)

Consider a single atom as a spacetime event. The event (Δs^{2}) is defined by the relation:

Δs^{2}=−(cΔt)^{2}+Δx^{2}+Δy^{2}+Δz^{2}

Special Relativity indicates that on the macrocanonical scale (our scale), a single event makes the link between the size of the displacement vector (Δx^{2}+Δy^{2}+Δz^{2}) and the corresponding time interval (Δt) (vis-à-vis the speed of light). When we shrink to the level of an atom (fractal operator), we are additionally bound by the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, which states that such (Δx^{2}+Δy^{2}+Δz^{2}) are not independent of their time varying measurements. However, Special Relativity also imposes that these observables are not independent of the time variable (since measurements of state variables *must* take place over a nonzero interval) over which they are measured!

It’s enough to make your head spin.

#### What Next?

I have already challenged the world to see if anyone can demonstrate how this formalism predicts the allotropic distribution of Sulphur (easiest example since allotropes are numerous). No one has gotten back to me. I don’t know why it didn’t work out yet, but I feel people are thinking about it…

Good Luck 😉

#### Epilogue: How Many Measurements are Possible?

Inclusive of their antimatter equivalents, the set of fundamental massive waveforms: {electron, proton, neutron} has 6 elements. This cardinality is also noted in the Trasarenu of the Bhagavata Purana (III.11.5, Lingham, 2016): 6.

It is not clear exactly what this means exactly but I wonder: Is six somehow connected to measurement limits of massive systems? Can the objective limits of subjective conscious converge with objective mathematical calculations? Should they? Can we give a reasonable treatise to “occult” or “mystic” phenomena? If so, which ones? Which systems are demonstrably based on false precepts?

As a warm-up, I have given a proof of Master’s Perfected Pariksha. I use concepts from modern physics (Entropy, Statistics) to demonstrate that his system is both of lower Entropy (less energy “wasted” on diagnosis) and higher discernment (13 basic archetypes instead of 10) than a rival system. So fun!

As another warm-up, I demonstrated reincarnation. I used the Quantum Mind Hypothesis as well as posits of the Copenhagen Interpretation. Now I’m really getting excited!

These steps are hopefully just the start of geeking out at a whole new level. Reality should be made as simple as possible of course, but no simpler… (giggles)

Jai Ganesha ❤